The Daily Caller

The Daily Caller
Florida Sen. Marco Rubio speaks at CPAC. (Kelsi Thorud / The Daily Caller) Florida Sen. Marco Rubio speaks at CPAC. (Kelsi Thorud / The Daily Caller)  

Rubio: Avoiding Immigration Bill Was ‘Smarter Thing’

Photo of Neil Munro
Neil Munro
White House Correspondent

Sen. Marco Rubio acknowledged May 13 that his support for an immigration-boosting bill has damaged him — but also promised he would try again to pass the controversial legislation.

“I get that, politically, that would have been a smarter thing” to let other legislators draft the bill, Rubio told reporters at a D.C. event in the National Press Club.

But “for this country to move forward in the 21st century, it needs to solve this,” Rubio stated.

“I made a decision a long time ago when I got involved in public service that I would do so to make a difference, not simply to score points,” he said.

“Sometimes that makes you well liked, sometimes that make you controversial, but that’s the only thing that makes it worth it,” Rubio said, after saying public opposition is cause by fear that the bill would not stop future illegal immigration.

Polls show the public strongly oppose illegal immigration and Rubio’s call for a greater inflow of skilled foreign workers.

Rubio’s statements came the day before progressives and business leaders renewed their well-funded campaign to persuade top GOP leaders that their party would gain from passage of the Senate’e 2013 immigration bill.

The offensive included speeches from Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and Sen. Chuck Schumer, and a May 14 op-ed from a political consultant active in the Tea Party movement, Sal Russo. The campaign includes a media-outreach campaign by Grover Norquist, plus a small-scale business-funded poll that claims to show support for an immigration bill among Tea Party activists.

Advocates for reduced immigration immediately fought back. Sen. Jeff Sessions, for example, used a floor speech to argue that Americans’ wages would shrink if the immigration increase becomes law.

“If you bring in 30 million people in the next ten years, as this [Rubio-drafted] bill would do — tripling the number that would normally be given legal status in America — it would bring down the per-person wealth and it would bring down wages,” Sessions said in a Senate speech.

“There is no disputing that, yet we have Senators who repeatedly speak on the floor and say this is going to increase wages,” he said. “Give me a break… It’s the opposite of reality,” said Sessions, who is pushing the GOP to adopt a lower labor-supply, higher-wage policy.

Last June, the Congressional Budget Office reported that Senate bill’s planned inflow of new workers would freeze or cut Americans’ wages for at least a decade, and also shift more of the nation’s income away from wage earners and towards investors for 20 years. In April, the New York Times reported that employees’ share of the nation’s annual income fell in 2012 to the lowest level in 63 years, and companies’ profits reached an after-tax, 85-year record share.

Erick Erickson, the top editor at, jumped in with an editorial slamming legislators’ failure to reverse President Barack Obama’s reduced enforcement of immigration law. “It is sickening to hear one Republican or phony conservative after another not only ignore the 10-alarm fire at our border and actually refer to Obama’s pyromania as ‘immigration reform,’” he wrote.

In his May 13 event at the press club, Rubio said some of the public’s opposition to the Senate bill was reasonable. “Quite frankly, much of the opposition that we faced to the bill was legitimate objections that people had and real concerns that need to be addressed,” he said.

But he also said that the “main impediment” to the bill’s progress is the public’s worry about more illegal immigration.

“What they fear, is that a decade from now, we’ll have another 12 million people here, that we’ll have a repeat of this problem as happened after the 1986 reform,” he said.