The Daily Caller

The Daily Caller
BERLIN, GERMANY - NOVEMBER 12:  A bartender at Hops & Barley brewpub pours a pint of beer on November 12, 2013 in Berlin, Germany. In a country known for centuries for its beer, several microbreweries have opened within the past year that are not only bending traditional rules on the types of ingredients used, opting for American-style hops such as Amarillo and Cascade instead of German ones, but also moving beyond the official legal doctrine, known as the Reinheitsgebot, or  BERLIN, GERMANY - NOVEMBER 12: A bartender at Hops & Barley brewpub pours a pint of beer on November 12, 2013 in Berlin, Germany. In a country known for centuries for its beer, several microbreweries have opened within the past year that are not only bending traditional rules on the types of ingredients used, opting for American-style hops such as Amarillo and Cascade instead of German ones, but also moving beyond the official legal doctrine, known as the Reinheitsgebot, or 'German Beer Purity Law,' which stated that water, barley and hops were the only ingredients allowed in the production of the beverage. While the law has since been expanded, it continues to be referenced on beer bottles for marketing purposes. (Photo by Adam Berry/Getty Images)  

Craft Beer Conundrum: Study Says Breweries Face Barriers

Craft breweries are facing a far more difficult time than they need to, according to a new study from the Mercatus Center at George Mason University.

“‘Build a better mousetrap,’ the old saying goes, ‘and the world will beat a path to your door,’” the study says. “Brew a better beer, however, and regulators will tie your door shut with red tape.”

The study highlights particularly difficult barriers to entry in the state of Virginia, where it is nearly as hard to start a brewery as it is to start a small business in Venezuela and China.

Laws held over from Prohibition make it very difficult for smaller craft breweries to enter the market, while simultaneously giving larger breweries such as Anheuser-Busch and Coors a market advantage.

“Limiting the ability of producers to both sell and promote alcohol directly to consumers was the historical social justification for the current regulations, but now there are also incumbents and more established firms that gain financially from the maintenance of these regulations,” the report reads.

In Virginia, it can take up to 177 days just for the approval of a brewer’s license, label and recipe. Once the brewer actually starts, the study says he or she must pay $2,150 if brewing fewer than 10,000 barrels — and $4,300, if more.

And this is just the cost. A brewer may also lose a license for seemingly draconian reasons, such as if the state believes he or she is “physically unable to carry on the business,” is not a person of “good moral character and repute,” fails to demonstrate the “financial responsibility sufficient to meet the requirements of the business,” or cannot “speak, understand, read and write the English language in a reasonably satisfactory manner.”

Bear in mind all of these regulations are subjective to the state. If at any time they feel a brewer lacks moral character, the brewer may be forced to cease operations.

But the restrictions aren’t exclusive to Virginia. Take Florida, which recently passed a law stating any brewery making more than 2,000 kegs of beer a year must sell to distributors before selling back to craft breweries for their own tasting rooms. Or that until recently, it was only legal to sell beer in containers less than 32-ounces or more than 128-ounces, which excludes the 64-ounce growlers popular at many craft breweries.

It’s because of these regulations that Matthew Mitchell and Christopher Koopman, the authors of the Mercatus study, say the craft brewing industry is in what is called a “tragedy of the anticommons.” This arises when “multiple parties have the ability to exclude access to a resource through taxation, regulation, or other means,” leading to a stagnated market.

The authors provide a historical example to put the problem into context: During the Middle Ages, the Holy Roman Empire controlled the Rhine River, including trade along the region. When the Holy Roman Empire fell, separate barons took over and started charging separately, not taking into account the actions of the others. Eventually, trade along the Rhine slowed to a crawl and greatly hurt everyone, including the barons themselves.

Like these robber barons, several overlapping entities at the local, state, and federal level have the ability to exclude access to the craft brewing market through taxation and regulation,” the report says. “Further, the political interests motivating the actions of each regulator are distinct from one another, diminishing the likelihood that any one regulator will account for the actions of the others.”

Virginia officials, however, say they haven’t seen any economic stifling. In an email to The Daily Caller, Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control public relations specialist Carol Mawyer said the business is growing.

“We’ve seen a rise in the number of craft breweries across Virginia,” she said. “The Virginia Craft Brewers Guild’s website notes that since [a law permitting breweries the right to sell beer for on-premise consumption], the craft beer industry in Virginia has seen 75 percent growth in the number of breweries, supporting 8,123 full time employment jobs and granting the commonwealth an economic impact of $623 million.”

But this growth still occurs amid a lot of regulations. Mitchell and Koopman argue for a more libertarian approach to the craft brewery industry.