Opinion

Why Is The West Blatantly Ignoring Iran’s Sanctions Violations In Sending Troops To Iraq?

In early December UN monitors pointed out that there was substantial evidence of sanctions violations by Iran in Iraq, where the leader of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps’ Quds Force was apparently operating with impunity in spite of a Security Council blacklist barring him from travelling to UN member states.

By the time of the report of the presence in Iraq of General Qasem Suleimani the Iranian regime had stopped even trying to conceal this violation. By the end of 2014 his contribution to Iran’s supposed fight against the Islamic State (IS) in Iraq had become a sort of PR windfall for the Islamic Republic of Iran. Photographs and videos of him on the Iraqi battlefield among Kurdish Peshmerga and Shiite militants were released in Iranian state media and Suleimani was almost exclusively given credit for military victories while the U.S.-led coalition’s air support was derided as ineffectual.

It is easy to imagine the reason for Suleimani’s sudden publicity was because the Iranian regime had concluded that the UN and its Western member states were unlikely to do anything to enforce the sanctions against the Quds Force commander, especially at a time when the U.S. president was sending secret letters to Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei urging cooperation between the two countries against the IS threat in Iraq and Syria. Whatever the earlier gamble it appears to have been justified by the lack of a serious response once the UN became aware of the visual record of Suleimani’s operations in Iraq.

But the reality is that the Quds Force, which Suleimani controls, is the foreign arm of the elite and politically powerful paramilitary force, the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). The Quds Force has been listed as a supporter of global terrorism by the European Union since 2011 and by the United States since 2007. By effectively ignoring last month’s report by the UN sanctions monitors, the UN member states have given the green light to military and political influence by a recognized terrorist leader. Where he goes, it can only be assumed that his fighting force will follow.

Indeed, the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI) revealed, also in December, that a significant number of Quds Force operatives are present on the battlefield in Iraq, among them high ranking commanders, as evidenced by the recent combat death of IRGC Brigadier General Hamid Taqavi.

Denial is no longer relevant. Suleimani has been photographed in Iraq and Syria, as have Iranian bombers that conducted bombing raids against IS targets in Iraq. Not only is the West aware of this involvement but many experts have concluded that for such bombings to have taken place, there had to have been a significant measure of coordination and cooperation between Iran and the U.S.-led coalition operating in the skies over Iraq.

But then, it is quite clear that the West knew about Suleimani’s presence in Iraq at least as early as last June when an Iraqi official confirmed that the Iranian commander had taken control of the Iraqi army, and when a former CIA operative identified Suleimani as the most powerful operative in Iraq at the time.

Not only have the U.S., the EU, and the UN been ignoring the presence of a recognized terrorist group inside a supposedly allied country for the past month; they have been systematically ignoring it for much longer. This is at once a disturbing precedent for the current conflict and a disturbing reminder of past conflicts in which we’ve trusted dubious paramilitary forces, only to see them develop into the major threat sometime down the line.

Given the volume of anti-American rhetoric coming out of the Iranian regime even at a time when it is presumably coordinating militarily with Western powers, and its unabated nuclear ambition, it is very easy to imagine that we face a similar danger in this case.