US

Michigan Governor Enacts Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform

(Photo: Scott Davidson/Creative CommonsFlickr)

Daily Caller News Foundation logo
Casey Harper Contributor
Font Size:

Michigan Governor Rick Snyder has signed into law new civil asset forfeiture legislation that some advocates hope will be the first step to fully reforming the practice in the state.

Civil asset forfeiture is a practice where police can seize your property and keep it even if they don’t convict or charge you with a crime. Then, you must go through the difficult and often unsuccessful process to recoup your property – whether it’s a vehicle, cash or your home – from the police.

The seven-bill package that Snyder signed Tuesday will require a higher standard of evidence for police to prove they should keep the property they seize. The burden of proof for keeping seized property will be raised from “preponderance” of the evidence to “clear and convincing.”

“Clear and convincing” means it must be substantially more likely than not that the suspect is guilty. A way of thinking about this is that the preponderance of the evidence standard requires you be 51 percent sure they are guilty whereas “clear and convincing” would be more like 60 to 75 percent.

The law also requires law enforcement to report their forfeiture programs to the state more thoroughly.

“We’ve heard stories across the nation of property unjustly seized and sold,” Rep. Klint Kesto, a sponsor of one of the bills in the package, said in a statement. “We want to make sure that doesn’t happen in our state. We’ve set a high floor for an individual’s personal and property rights. Law enforcement, on the other side, has a set of clear standards when it comes to utilizing asset forfeiture.”

Michigan law enforcement reported that they seized $20.4 million through civil asset forfeiture, but those numbers are likely low since nearly ten percent of agencies did not report.

The new reforms are relatively weak. Recent bills in other states, such as New Mexico, required a criminal conviction before property could be forfeited. Stronger reforms also required that the forfeited funds be sent directly to the state, not the law enforcement agency, so they are not incentived to seize unnecessarily.

Don’t understand civil asset forfeiture?

WATCH:

Follow Casey on Twitter and like him on Facebook

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.