Should elected officials sign the Taxpayer Protection Pledge committing in writing to oppose and vote against any and all net tax increases?
Grover Norquist | All Articles
- Send Email
- Subscribe to RSS
- Follow on Twitter
Mr. Norquist, a native of Massachusetts, has been one of Washington's most effective issues management strategists for over two decades.
Mr. Norquist is president of <a href="http://www.atr.org/">Americans for Tax Reform (ATR)</a>, a coalition of taxpayer groups, individuals and businesses opposed to higher taxes at the federal, state and local levels. ATR organizes the TAXPAYER PROTECTION PLEDGE, which asks all candidates for federal and state office to commit themselves in writing to oppose all tax increases. To date, 172 House members, and 34 Senators have taken the pledge. On the state level, 7 governors and over 1100 state legislators have taken the pledge.
Mr. Norquist also:
* Serves on the board of directors of the National Rifle Association of America.
* Serves on the board of directors of the American Conservative Union.
* Serves as a Contributing Editor to the American Spectator Magazine.
* Serves as president of the American Society of Competitiveness.
* Authored the book Leave Us Alone: Getting the Government's Hands Off Our Money, Our Guns, Our Lives
In the past, Mr. Norquist served as:
* A commissioner on the Advisory Commission on Electronic Commerce.
* A commissioner on the National Commission on Restructuring the Internal Revenue Service.
* Economist and chief speech-writer, U.S. Chamber of Commerce (1983-1984).
* Campaign staff on the 1988, 1992, 1996 Republican Platform Committees.
* Executive director of the National Taxpayersâ€™ Union.
* Executive director of the College Republicans.
In the words of Newt Gingrich, Grover Norquist is "the person who I regard as the most innovative, creative, courageous and entrepreneurial leader of the anti-tax efforts and of conservative grassroots activism in America . . . He has truly made a difference and truly changed American history."
P.J. O'Rourke says, "Grover Norquist is Tom Paine crossed with Lee Atwater plus just a soupcon of Madame Defarge."
Arianna Huffington calls Norquist "The dark wizard of the Right's anti-tax cult"
Mr. Norquist holds a Masters of Business Administration and a Bachelor of Arts degree in Economics, both from Harvard University. He lives in Washington, DC with his wife, Samah and his daughters, Grace, and Giselle.
Second Amendment supporters often cite the Second Amendment as our “First Freedom,” and they’re right: the right to bear arms helped secure what might be called informally our “Second Freedom,” won in the Revolution, freedom from taxation without representation.
Today millions of Americans will file their taxes with the federal government. But can the IRS be trusted with your personal information?
The Fourth Amendment prohibits unreasonable search and seizure of our “persons, houses, papers and effects.” The government can’t open our postal mail without a warrant. It can’t search our office files. It can’t tap our telephones without going before a judge and showing probable cause to believe we are committing a crime.
The political world has changed dramatically in the past few years to the advantage of Reagan Republicans despite losing two presidential elections to Barack Obama.
America is the richest and most immigrant-friendly country in the world. The two are inextricably linked. It’s our history, and it’s what we’ve proved again and again. Those who choose to change our history and would make us less immigrant-friendly would also make us less successful, less prosperous, and certainly less American.
It’s official. President Obama is worse than Richard Nixon.
As Mitt Romney is fond of pointing out, the upcoming election is about choices. On very few issues is the choice more distinct than on Medicare. President Obama’s Medicare plan is little more than benefit cuts for current seniors and certain Medicare bankruptcy for future retirees. The Romney-Ryan plan envisions no Medicare changes for current or near-retirees, and a reformed system for younger workers based on choice and competition.
Democrats have long been the party that punishes success — Senate Democrats are advocating for the “Buffett Rule,” a millionaires’ tax, while a pillar of President Obama’s re-election campaign is that people making $250,000 should give the government more money. Conservatives correctly worry that prohibitive tax rates deter hard work by removing compensation incentives, effectively capping workers’ wages.
Today marks the second anniversary of the signing of the jobs-killing Obamacare law. That law contains 20 new or higher taxes on American families and small employers. At least seven of these tax increases fall directly on families making less than $250,000 per year. This is a direct violation of candidate Obama’s “firm pledge” against “any form of tax increase” on these families.
Out of the 20 new or higher taxes in Obamacare, there are four that most hurt small employers.
This is the third installment in a five-part series on the taxes embedded in Obamacare. The first installment, "The five tax hikes in Obamacare that most hurt seniors," can be found here. The second installment, "Obamacare's tax war on women," can be found here.
This is the second installment in a five-part series on the taxes embedded in Obamacare. The first installment, "The five tax hikes in Obamacare that most hurt seniors," can be found here.
The jobs-killing Obamacare law contains 20 new or higher taxes on American families and employers. Many of these tax increases fall on families making less than $250,000 --- a direct violation of candidate Obama's promise not to raise "any form" of taxes on these families. In less than a week, the second anniversary of Obamacare being signed into law will take place. The Supreme Court will be hearing oral arguments about the constitutionality of Obamacare next week.
All political activists must wear bifocals so they can keep an eye on the present battle and also focus on the long run.
To read Andy Stern’s letter to Grover Norquist, click here.
It has become clear that this Congress is not going to be one that passes fundamental tax reform. Anything that would pass the Democrat Senate or be acceptable to President Obama would be a net tax increase, and that is unacceptable to the House of Representatives and their 237 Taxpayer Protection Pledge signers. Attempts thus far at tax reform — the Simpson-Bowles commission and “Gang of Six” efforts come to mind — have been tax increases disguised as rate-cutting tax reform. Nevertheless, that does not mean that a significant opportunity isn’t there on an aspect of fundamental tax reform — namely, doing another round of low-tax repatriation of foreign corporate profits.
Between now and the November 2 election there are several dangers that stand between conservatives and the overwhelming victory that present polls predict.
This Thursday will mark the beginning of a series of tax increases on the American people in order to pay for Obamacare. Over the next several years, about twenty new or higher taxes will go into effect. Many of these tax increases are well-known. There are the “individual mandate” and “employer mandate” excise taxes. There is the infamous “Cadillac plan” tax. There’s a new surtax on capital gains and dividends. There’s new taxes on health savings accounts (HSAs) and flexible spending accounts (FSAs). The list goes on.