<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Daily Caller &#187; Nandan Kenkeremath</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dailycaller.com/author/nkenkeremath/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dailycaller.com</link>
	<description>The Daily Caller features breaking news, opinion, research, and entertainment 24 hours a day.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 23:56:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Government dependency for many, financial servitude for others</title>
		<link>http://dailycaller.com/2010/03/22/government-dependency-for-many-financial-servitude-for-others/</link>
		<comments>http://dailycaller.com/2010/03/22/government-dependency-for-many-financial-servitude-for-others/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nandan Kenkeremath</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CBO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycaller.com/?p=665899</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The purported Democrat moderates who voted for Obama Care are really, really gullible.  I have previously raised the issue of many misleading statements in the health care debate.  With respect to the budget issues, these have been aired out by many, including Congressman Paul Ryan.  However, in statement after statement avowed moderate Democrats appear oblivious to these points]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://dailycaller.com/2010/03/22/government-dependency-for-many-financial-servitude-for-others/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ashamed of their vote, ashamed of their process</title>
		<link>http://dailycaller.com/2010/03/18/ashamed-of-their-vote-ashamed-of-their-process/</link>
		<comments>http://dailycaller.com/2010/03/18/ashamed-of-their-vote-ashamed-of-their-process/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 04:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nandan Kenkeremath</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Filibuster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Rules Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear option]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parliamentary procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Representative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vote]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycaller.com/?p=635392</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Article 1, Section 7 of the Constitution says that in order for a “Bill” to “become a Law,” it “shall have passed the House of Representatives and the Senate.” There should be a “bill” that is the subject of a vote in each body. The core problem under the Slaughter approach, as I see it, is not so much the name given to the vote. I think the House can vote to deem a bill approved, if it is just a matter of using a different word]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://dailycaller.com/2010/03/18/ashamed-of-their-vote-ashamed-of-their-process/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Beer summits may be safer for our fiscal future</title>
		<link>http://dailycaller.com/2010/03/01/beer-summits-may-be-safer-for-our-fiscal-future/</link>
		<comments>http://dailycaller.com/2010/03/01/beer-summits-may-be-safer-for-our-fiscal-future/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 05:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nandan Kenkeremath</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business and Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health care reform in the United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House of Representatives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicaid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Ryan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycaller.com/?p=511502</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After the 40-minute “beer summit” last year, our president said, “I have always believed that what brings us together is stronger than what pulls us apart.” It was that kind of “Harvard-student-become president-has-a-beer-with-Harvard-professor-and-a-police-officer” kind of moment. For a wonk like me, the bipartisan health care summit was even more interesting than the improbable beer summit—if you believe anything could be.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://dailycaller.com/2010/03/01/beer-summits-may-be-safer-for-our-fiscal-future/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>We&#8217;ve seen but a glimpse of ugly in health care reform</title>
		<link>http://dailycaller.com/2010/01/31/weve-seen-but-a-glimpse-of-ugly-in-health-care-reform/</link>
		<comments>http://dailycaller.com/2010/01/31/weve-seen-but-a-glimpse-of-ugly-in-health-care-reform/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 21:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nandan Kenkeremath</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congressional Budget Office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democratic Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health care in the United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health care reform in the United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Massachusetts, United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycaller.com/?p=339034</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our president attributes the recent string of election losses for the Democrats and public opposition to his legislative agenda to a generalized sense of anger—the kind that swept him into office. Is this (A) failure to comprehend, (B) spin, (C) arrogance or (D) all of the above?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://dailycaller.com/2010/01/31/weve-seen-but-a-glimpse-of-ugly-in-health-care-reform/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The seven lies of health care</title>
		<link>http://dailycaller.com/2010/01/13/the-seven-lies-of-health-care/</link>
		<comments>http://dailycaller.com/2010/01/13/the-seven-lies-of-health-care/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 05:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nandan Kenkeremath</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health care reform in the United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicaid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycaller.com/?p=236110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The practice of national politics in America is a mixture of lies and truth—an ebullient broth of misinformation, misdirection, and hype coupled with some real issues and honest beliefs.  With the help of others, I would like to catalogue the many flavors of lies in the Washington political scene. The health care reform initiative is a rich example.  So, let’s start with one basic type of lie and see how that lie associates with seven other types.
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://dailycaller.com/2010/01/13/the-seven-lies-of-health-care/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

