In the realm of ridiculous liberal propaganda, New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman plans to sue the Trump administration if the Obamacare replacement bill becomes law. His complaint? That it defunds Planned Parenthood and therefore it is “an unconstitutional attack on women’s rights to reproductive health services, including abortion.”
Scott Weiser | All Articles
- Subscribe to RSS
Scott Weiser is editor-in-chief of http://Altnews.US.
In order for the border wall to ever get built a couple of things must happen: First, the federal government must exercise eminent domain and take a strip of land perhaps a mile wide along the length of the border, paying the private property owners "just compensation" as constitutionally required. Second, the strip of land so acquired must be declared to be a national security border control zone and placed under the control of the U.S. Army.
With the words “I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic” and “I will administer justice without respect to persons, and do equal right to the poor and to the rich, and that I will faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all the duties incumbent upon me,” Judge Neil Gorsuch was sworn in as the 113th Justice of the Supreme Court, which won’t end the political posturing and hyperbole from the left.
The Aurora Sentinel in Aurora, CO published an editorial opining that Judge Neil Gorsuch is an “affable, smart, diligent but fatally flawed” nominee for the Supreme Court. The backhanded compliment doesn’t ameliorate the leftist progressive argument the newspaper trots out as justification for opposing his appointment.
The teapot tempests are raging in DC over Judge Neil Gorsuch’s qualifications to become a Supreme Court Justice. Senate Democrats vied with Republican Senators for ideological supremacy yesterday, but the most ridiculous attack on the eminently qualified candidate appeared from an unanticipated source on Sunday.
It’s budget-whiner season again and progressive big-government gadflies are swarming around President Trump’s proposed budget cuts like the buzzing blood sucking pests that drive arctic caribou herds and humans to literal madness in the Great White North.
Have you ever wondered why Uber mostly airs commercials touting the advantages of being an Uber driver but rarely airs one encouraging people to order an Uber? Well, Uber CEO Travis Kalanick’s temper tantrum in driver Fawzi Kamel’s car is the perfect example of why this is so. Kamel accused Kalanick of manipulating the fare structure to benefit Uber’s advantage over competitors like Lyft without much concern for how those fare manipulations affect Uber drivers. And Kamel is absolutely correct, that’s exactly what Uber does -- but then again so does Lyft and every other ridesharing company.
Is a threat to eliminate the tax exemption of churches that endorse candidates or political parties posed by a 1954 law called the “Johnson Amendment” a constitutional infringement on the rights of church leaders to freely express themselves from the pulpit?
The world has become economically dependent on the Internet. The ability to connect and share information is essential to the functioning not just of economic markets but also of government itself. As computer technology advances we as a society become ever more dependent on an Internet of things that extend far beyond our home computers and laptops. Everything from automobiles to zoos are web-connected today and those connections multiply exponentially as new connected devices are invented and marketed.
What is “religion” and what aspects of religion does the First Amendment protect? This is a question that our leaders and our society are reluctant to ask. We see frequent recourse to the text of the Constitution itself where it says “Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof” but there is precious little debate about what the word religion actually means in that context.
President Trump was correct in excoriating liberal activist federal judge James Robart for his grossly legally defective temporary restraining order against President Trump’s temporary travel ban. Beyond excoriation Robart needs to be impeached and removed from the bench for judicial incompetence.