<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Daily Caller &#187; Wayne Crews</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dailycaller.com/author/wcrews/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dailycaller.com</link>
	<description>The Daily Caller features breaking news, opinion, research, and entertainment 24 hours a day.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 04:07:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Who&#8217;s the bigger regulator, Bush or Obama?</title>
		<link>http://dailycaller.com/2012/01/25/whos-the-bigger-regulator-bush-or-obama/</link>
		<comments>http://dailycaller.com/2012/01/25/whos-the-bigger-regulator-bush-or-obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 20:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Crews</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sub4:Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycaller.com/?p=3029154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why Obama's claim that he's less of a regulator than Bush is misleading.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://dailycaller.com/2012/01/25/whos-the-bigger-regulator-bush-or-obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Not neutrality, courtesy of the FCC</title>
		<link>http://dailycaller.com/2010/10/12/not-neutrality-courtesy-of-the-fcc/</link>
		<comments>http://dailycaller.com/2010/10/12/not-neutrality-courtesy-of-the-fcc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 00:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Crews</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broadband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Competitive Enterprise Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computer law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Communications Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network Neutrality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network neutrality in the United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telecommunications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycaller.com/?p=1600907</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FCC regulators want to impose net neutrality on the Internet. Here's why doing so would be a mistake.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://dailycaller.com/2010/10/12/not-neutrality-courtesy-of-the-fcc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Before net neutrality eats the world</title>
		<link>http://dailycaller.com/2010/08/06/before-net-neutrality-eats-the-world/</link>
		<comments>http://dailycaller.com/2010/08/06/before-net-neutrality-eats-the-world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 13:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Crews</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sub1:Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Competitive Enterprise Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computer law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Communications Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network Neutrality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verizon Communications Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycaller.com/?p=1382574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Net doesn’t need forced neutrality; nor does it even need the two tiers of Verizon and Google; it needs as many tiers as the market wants to sustain]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://dailycaller.com/2010/08/06/before-net-neutrality-eats-the-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Lady Gaga economy</title>
		<link>http://dailycaller.com/2010/07/09/the-lady-gaga-economy/</link>
		<comments>http://dailycaller.com/2010/07/09/the-lady-gaga-economy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 15:43:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Crews</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sub3:Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Competitive Enterprise Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inflation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macroeconomics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax cut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington, United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycaller.com/?p=1293267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the convoluted way things occur to me, I thought of the contrast between our limping general economy, and her thriving fame-monster micro-economy]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://dailycaller.com/2010/07/09/the-lady-gaga-economy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>16</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Splinternets and cyberspaces vs. net neutrality</title>
		<link>http://dailycaller.com/2010/02/03/splinternets-and-cyberspaces-vs-net-neutrality/</link>
		<comments>http://dailycaller.com/2010/02/03/splinternets-and-cyberspaces-vs-net-neutrality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 05:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Crews</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Competitive Enterprise Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computer law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Communications Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mass media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network Neutrality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycaller.com/?p=349647</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Washington, D.C., fight over “net neutrality” in some ways only scratches the surface of what’s really at stake in the question of government regulation of Internet service providers’ treatment of online content. The downside of permitting FCC and Congressional authority over cyberspace “neutrality” is hard to overstate.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://dailycaller.com/2010/02/03/splinternets-and-cyberspaces-vs-net-neutrality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The state of our union: paralysis</title>
		<link>http://dailycaller.com/2010/01/27/the-state-of-our-union-paralysis/</link>
		<comments>http://dailycaller.com/2010/01/27/the-state-of-our-union-paralysis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 13:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Crews</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business and Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carbon finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emissions trading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycaller.com/?p=324141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since, as they say, the world belongs to those who aren't cursed with self awareness, last night a politician informed you that all the big government you thought you didn't want, you actually do want.  ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://dailycaller.com/2010/01/27/the-state-of-our-union-paralysis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Year One report card: Treasury gets a &#8216;D&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://dailycaller.com/2010/01/20/year-one-report-card-treasury-gets-a-d/</link>
		<comments>http://dailycaller.com/2010/01/20/year-one-report-card-treasury-gets-a-d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Crews</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business and Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Competitive Enterprise Institute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of the Treasury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George W. Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Subprime mortgage crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[US Federal Reserve]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dailycaller.com/?p=272886</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a libertarian world of civil rather than political society, the Treasury Department would pay the modest bills of a constitutionally limited government. It’s true that Congress holds the purse strings; but during an economic and financial crisis rooted in already-gargantuan government that—despite the news reports—has regulated money, credit and interest rates for a century, a sane Treasury’s vision for leadership and recovery would rule out seducing Congress with yet more elaborate and larger purses. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://dailycaller.com/2010/01/20/year-one-report-card-treasury-gets-a-d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

