Earlier today, Al Gore responded to a question posed last week by Fox News host Bill O’Reilly: (more)
From the Independent, March 20th, 2000: (more)
Global warming alarmists claim vindication after last year’s data manipulation scandal. Don’t believe the ‘independent’ reviews. (more)
There are only three things you need to know about the Kerry-Lieberman cap-and-trade bill that was released Wednesday—it will accomplish nothing for the environment; it will cost a lot of money and it will financially enrich and politically empower a host of scoundrels. (more)
Hard on the heels of the report of the one-day British Parliamentary inquiry into the Climategate scandal comes the report of the grandly-named International Science Assessment Panel set up by the University of East Anglia (UEA). Surprise, surprise, it finds nothing wrong except a few lapses in concentration caused by all the hard work climate scientists are doing to save the planet. Unfortunately for the alarmist cheerleaders who will treat these reports as complete exoneration, they suffer from exactly the same problems as the scientific reports Climategate centered around. They are sloppy and incomplete while pretending to be the comprehensive answer. As such, they damage the authority of science just as much as Climategate itself. (more)
The Guardian interviewed environmental scientist James Lovelock about the politics of climate change post-East Anglia. The quotes are equal parts harrowing: (more)
Republican Sen. Jim Inhofe of Oklahoma will ask the Justice Department to investigate Pennsylvania State University climatologist and White House adviser Michael E. Mann for his involvement in Climategate, Inhofe told The Daily Caller Monday night. (more)
Three years after Boston Globe columnist Ellen Goodman wrote, “Let’s just say that global warming deniers are now on a par with Holocaust deniers,” the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), its seminal 2007 report and the University of East Anglia all have come under attack for mistakes ranging from erroneous projections of when the Himalayan glaciers will melt to hiding and destroying contradictory data. (more)
One day in, and already one of the five reviews into “climategate” has been hit by its own controversy. (more)
Dotty Harry shoots own foot, Obama’s favorite bill – With Kennedy Family gone, District bars anticipate having all this extra liquor around – Charlie Crist doubles efforts to prove Marco Rubio’s real identity – Thanks to sly pervert, detained missionaries stay detained – Climategate panelist resigns amid allegations of bias – New Jersey granola types freak over possible transit fare hike (more)
A member of an independent panel to investigate claims that climate scientists covered up flawed data on global warming has been forced to resign after sceptics questioned his impartiality. (more)
LONDON – The University of East Anglia says it will conduct a new review of the science published by its scandal-hit Climate Research Unit. (more)
Science is increasingly being manipulated by those who try to use it to justify political choices based on their ethical preferences and who are willing to suppress evidence of conflict between those preferences and the underlying reality. This problem is clearly seen in two policy domains, health care and climate policy. (more)
1.) White House pledges “discipline in the spending process” (more)
The university at the center of the climate change scandal over stolen e-mails broke the law by refusing to hand over its raw data for public scrutiny. (more)






















