Opinion

ObamaCare, megatrends and consumerism

Ron Bachman Contributor

Megatrends represent major movements so powerful that the direction of change cannot be stopped. Federal laws can speed up or slow down megatrend forces. But, like dammed rivers megatrends will redirect themselves to achieve the inevitable result. Health care consumerism is such a force.

Government and the quest for political power is a strong force in and of itself. Cynics will point to increasing demands for federal support and government dependency by large parts of our population. That may be a current political direction, but growing welfare and expanding entitlements is not a financially sustainable path and therefore cannot be a megatrend.

[intlink id=”691148″ type=”post”]ObamaCare is fighting health care consumerism[/intlink] and broad cultural movements to personal responsibility, individual ownership, self-reliance, convenience, choice, and transparency. The health mandates violate the growth of personal responsibility and self-reliance. Government required plan designs violate the cultural movement to choice. Added bureaucracies create barriers to responsive plan designs and convenient medical services. Federal subsidies violate the concept of individual ownership. [intlink id=”723871″ type=”post”]Backroom dealing between big government and lobbying interests[/intlink] violate transparency. For the political class the passage of ObamaCare is a pyrrhic victory. It assumes that Americans are sheep that can be led to slaughter for feeding the political class and its favored supporters. It will either fail in court as unconstitutional or defeated by the ballot box.

The future is not the opiate of government, but the empowerment of “Health care Consumerism.” Health care consumerism is about transforming health benefit plans by putting economic purchasing power and decision-making in the hands of participants. It’s about supplying the information and decision support tools needed, along with financial incentives, rewards, and other benefits that encourage personal involvement in altering health and health care purchasing behaviors.

Health care consumerism is independent of plan design. Health care consumerism includes opportunities to accumulate funds and/or receive grants through “shared-savings.” That is, individuals can be financially rewarded for doing the right activities that improve their health and lower costs. Rewards can include activities such as, participation in a wellness assessment, compliance with a condition management program (e.g. taking medications, diet, exercise, office visits), and maintenance of good health characteristics (e.g. blood pressure, cholesterol, nicotine use, body mass index).

Since 2004, a popular form of health care consumerism has been HSA eligible plans. Insurance with personal savings accounts (HSAs and FSAs), while not killed, are seriously limited in ObamaCare. But these are not the only forms of health care consumerism. In 2002, health reimbursement arrangements (HRAs) were established by the Treasury Department. HRAs can be used with any plan that the Secretary mandates. Congress either forgot about or ignored the many uses and flexibility of HRAs.

ObamaCare deals with limited plan choices, mandated benefits, and premium controls. The real world has moved to next generation health care consumerism with member engagement, rewarding healthy behaviors, and promoting personal responsibility. Plans are now focusing on rewards and incentives. Health Incentive Accounts (HIAs) are a special form of HRA that builds value only from rewards and incentives. There are many other special use HRAs that may become the channels for health care consumerism.

Health care consumerism is a compelling force because it embraces lowering costs, improving quality, enhancing choice, and expanding access by empowering individuals and reinforcing personal responsibility. It is the force operating throughout our economy and is just beginning to be structured into health care and insurance.

The 2009 American Academy of Actuaries multi-year study of health care consumerism concluded that first year claims could be lowered by 12-20 percent with future cost trends decreased by 3-5 percent. While HSA are disfavored, employers and insurers would be wise to consider health care consumerism as allowed. Under the legislation, financial rewards based on health status are increased from 20 percent to 30 percent. The Secretary of Health and Human Services has the authority to increase that limit to 50 percent. ObamaCare still allows unlimited rewards and incentives for participation and engagement.

ObamaCare was never about health or health care reform. At best it is health insurance reform legislation. At worst it is government intrusion into the insurance industry that creates a transfer of wealth from Medicare beneficiaries and pre-ObamaCare insureds to low income non-elderly and the previously uninsured. It is now a reality. It is the law of the land. It will produce changes and unintended consequences for individuals, employers, companies, and medical industry stakeholders. Everyone will now begin to reposition their personal and business interests to minimize the damage and maximize opportunities in this new world of ObamaCare.

As we await the ultimate demise of ObamaCare, the megatrend of health care consumerism continues. Americans who bank electronically at ATMs, purchase stocks over the internet, buy and sell goods through eBay, maintain their music with iTunes, keep personal videos on facebook, seek employment through LinkedIn, and control television programming with Tivo will not tolerate the government controlling their health, their most personal asset. The Dutch boy learned decades ago that one cannot hold back the waters in a dam. Prepare – a flood of freedom is ahead.

Ronald E. Bachman FSA, MAAA is President & CEO of Health care Visions, Inc. He is a Senior Fellow at the Center for Health Transformation, the Georgia Public Policy Foundation, the Wye River Group on Health and the National Center for Policy Analysis.