Politics

Budget deal turns to PR duel

Neil Munro White House Correspondent
Font Size:

White House debt-ceiling negotiations have collapsed into a public relations duel, as each political coalition tries to harness the public’s simultaneous fears of defaults and runaway budgets.

Obama administration officials want swing voters to pressure Republicans to agree to a tax increase in advance of the 2012 elections. Republicans want the same voters to pressure Democrats to accept budget cuts.

White House officials believe they have a winning hand. Republicans, meanwhile, view themselves as better positioned in the current debt-ceiling fight than they were in mid-1990s budget showdowns with President Bill Clinton.

“That’s really the nub of it — each side thinks they’re making progress, otherwise they would not be holding out,“ said Tevi Troy, a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute and a former senior official in the George W. Bush administration.

“The Democrats continually look back to the 1995, 1996, Clinton playbook, but we are in a different era with a much greater sense of reality [among the public] about the financial crisis we’re facing,” Troy said.

“The difference [now] is that you can turn on the TV and see riots in Europe, Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s threatening to downgrade our credit rating,” said Michael Franc, the Heritage Foundation’s vice president for political outreach. (Optimism for good deal on debt limit at all-time low)

On Monday, President Barack Obama announced that he would accept nothing less than a major tax increase, and that federal job-creation spending should increase once the deal is signed.

On Tuesday afternoon, the president increased the political pressure on Republicans when he refused to shield federal check-writing operations from an Aug. 2 budget shutdown. Each month those automated operations distribute more than 70 million Social Security, disability and veterans’ checks.

“Democrats see gaining a tax increase from the Republicans would be a huge political win for them,” said Troy. “They would pound Republicans just as they did with President George H. Bush” after he signed a tax deal in 1990.

On Monday, Sen. Charles Schumer, a New York Democrat, predicted that Republicans would cave.

“When we get close, when the bond markets start to get a little jittery, God forbid, the pressure is going to fall much greater on them than us, and I think that will bring us to the table for a larger deal,” Schumer said in an interview on MSNBC.

There’s some evidence that poll numbers are moving in the administration’s favor.

A July poll released Monday, conducted by the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press and The Washington Post, showed that 45 percent of swing-voting independents were more concerned about an economic default than they were about greater spending and debt. That’s up from 34 percent in mid-May.

Democrats have won these crisis showdowns many times before. (House members propose bill to ensure military checks if debt ceiling not raised)

In April, for example, Obama used the threat of a government shutdown to pressure Republicans for a deal which did not significantly reduce the federal budget.

Democrats also were victorious over House Speaker Newt Gingrich in 1995 and 1996, when the speaker wanted to cut spending and reform many discretionary and entitlement programs.

If there’s a default, “Republicans can lose the House,” former Democratic Rep. Marvin Frost predicted on Wednesday. Frost was elected to Congress in 1979. He represented his Texas district for 25 years.

Government shutdowns get blamed on Republicans even when Democrats force the issue, said Franc. A primary reason for this, he believes, is that “the American people associate the Republicans with people who don’t like government … the finger-pointing goes to Republicans.”

The Democrats’ confidence was boosted Tuesday when Sen. Mitch McConnell introduced a measure that has divided GOP legislators. McConnell’s measure would prevent a default, and force the president to repeatedly ask for more money and identify projects for cutting between now and the November elections.

That’s a clever way to get the public behind the GOP in November 2012 because it shows that Obama is pushing the nation deeper into the red, Republicans said Wednesday.

The deficit “is a disaster in the making because we have a President who won’t tackle the problem,” Republican National Committee chairman Reince Priebus said today.

On Tuesday and Wednesday, White House spokesman Jay Carney, repeatedly refused to detail the president’s much-touted proposals to cut spending.

McConnell’s plan reflects the fear of many Republicans that the swing-voting public will support their budget-cutting plans only until they see an imminent government shutdown or default.

McConnell and other Republicans “sense the President holds more cards than congressional Republicans do,” said Franc. As president, Obama “gets to choose which political bombs to set off … the Republicans apparently think he is choosing to set of the Social Security bomb and that Republicans will suffer,” Franc said.

In the 1990s, said Franc, “The Republicans got absolutely torched … because in large part, Clinton had a very compliant media.” Today, he said, “it is a much more balanced playing field.”

Boehner today illustrated both sides of the GOP coalition. “Nobody wants to go [to a default], because nobody knows what’s going to happen — it’s a crapshoot,” he said in a short interview after meeting with Obama at the White House. But he also pushed the GOP’s call for budget cuts, saying “the American people want us to hang tough,” and that White House officials “know they’re not winning.”

Democrats’ claims of public support are also unjustified, said Franc. For example, their calls for higher tax rates are misplaced because they don’t realize that the public’s estimate of fair tax rates is already below what middle class people now pay, he said. The fact that Obama and other Democrats won’t detail their economic packages shows they recognize the unpopularity of their preferences, he said.

Obama’s ability to push his policy is also weakened by his poor economic record, said Troy.

Polls show support for Obama’s economic record is in the 30s, a growing percentage of swing-voters see the economy in a depression and getting worse, and the Bureau of Labor Statistics has announced that only 18,000 new jobs were created in June and 25,000 in May.

The public increasingly recognizes, Franc said, that “the credit card has run out, and we have to do something about it.”