Mark Steyn: Obama, Neville Chamberlain Comparison Is ‘Unfair To Chamberlain’ [VIDEO]

Al Weaver Reporter
Font Size:

Mark Steyn blasted President Obama for agreeing to the Iran nuclear deal, telling Sean Hannity Tuesday a comparison between Obama and former British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain is “unfair” to Chamberlain.

According to the conservative commentator, while Chamberlain was wrong to sign the Munich Agreement and hand over chunks of the Sudetenland to Czechoslovakia to appease Adolf Hitler, he was an “honorable man.” On the other hand, Steyn says Obama’s agreement with Iran is “significantly worse” than Chamberlain’s decision, saying he is facilitating Iran’s “re-entry into the global community.”

Steyn added further that the “horrors of Germany” were unknown to Chamberlain, unlike Obama while considering this deal with the Iranians.

“I think actually that’s rather unfair to Neville Chamberlain,” Steyn told Hannity. “He got the central question of the 1930s wrong, but he was an honorable man who believed he was acting in the interests of his country and the British Empire which he loved.”

“When Churchill became prime minister he kept Chamberlain on and had him chair the War Cabinet in his absence,” Steyn said. “And Churchill wept over Chamberlain’s funeral casket, and claimed he was an honorable man who just happened to be wrong.”

“I don’t think you can say that about Obama. I think what Obama did is significantly worse than what Neville Chamberlain did,” Steyn continued. “I don’t think, in effect, Obama was negotiating on behalf of the United States. I think what happened at these talks is that he and the Iranians were, in a sense, negotiating together to anoint Iran as the regional power in the Middle East and to facilitate Iran’s re-entry — the biggest planetary sponsor of terrorism, to facilitate its re-entry into the global community. That’s what Obama was there doing.”

“I think that’s the other difference between Obama and Chamberlain. The horrors of the — of what Germany did were not known to Neville Chamberlain,” Steyn said. “And in a sense, the appeasers of the 1930s did so because of the horrors of the first World War and the lost generation, and they didn’t want that to happen again. And it’s because we know they got it wrong, that history won’t give us the same opt out card. Because we should have known better because it had happened before.”

Steyn, who guests hosts regularly for Rush Limbaugh, added that Obama’s issue is that “he sees America as the problem” in the global arena.

“And I think what Obama gets here, I think it does come back to a — to his classic Marxist worldview in which he sees America as the problem on the world’s stage,” Steyn said. “And if you look at everything he did — he’s done…what he did with Iran fits into that context.”

“I mean, whether you look at missile defense in Eastern Europe, where he takes the side of Russia over US allies like Poland and the Czech Republic. If you look at little things, like the Falklands Islands, where he takes the side of Argentina over a U.S. allies like United Kingdom,” he argued. “And in the Middle East, he’s taken the side of Iran over U.S. allies like the Sunni monarchies and Israel because his central view is that America and American power is the problem in the world. And, therefore, American allies are part of that problem. And, therefore, what he does is, in a sense, withdraw from the world, and enhance the position of the enemies of American allies. That’s what he’s done in the Middle East. And it won’t be confined to the Middle East, it’ll spread beyond that.”


[h/t: Breitbart]