Court Strikes Down Texas Voter ID Law, Claims It’s ‘Racially Discriminatory’

REUTERS/Charles Mostoller

Daily Caller News Foundation logo
Kevin Daley Supreme Court correspondent
Font Size:

The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that Texas’ voter ID law violates the federal Voting Rights Act (VRA) Wednesday, because of its discriminatory effect on minority communities.

In a 9-6 vote, the full court affirmed an earlier ruling that found the Texas law violates the VRA because of its disparate impact on minority voters. The law requires Texans to present a state-issued identification card before casting ballots. The 5th Circuit heard the case en banc, meaning every judge in the circuit voted, instead of the typical panel of three judges.

The finding was something of a surprise, as the 5th Circuit is perhaps the most conservative appellate court in the country.

The court relied on a bevy of expert testimony in reaching its conclusion. One such study cited by the court, a regression analysis conducted by Dr. Stephen Ansolabehere, found “Hispanic registered voters and Black registered voters were respectively 195% and 305% more likely than their Anglo peers to lack” the necessary ID.  (RELATED: Federal Court Puts Hold On Wisconsin Voter ID Law)

The state hoped the court would apply a less rigorous test used by another federal court to evaluate the law. The court harshly rejected the argument.

“As the State would have it, so long as the State can articulate a legitimate justification for its election law and some voters are able to meet the requirements, there is no Section 2 violation,” the ruling says. “This argument effectively nullifies the protections of the Voting Rights Act by giving states a free pass to enact needlessly burdensome laws with impermissible racially discriminatory impacts. The Voting Rights Act was enacted to prevent just such invidious, subtle forms of discrimination.”

The court also vacated a previous ruling that found Texas acted with discriminatory intent in passing the law, remanding the case back to a lower court to rehear the question, drawing vigorous protests from dissenting judges.

“By keeping this latter claim alive, the majority fans the flames of perniciously irresponsible racial name-calling,” the judges wrote.

Texas voting practices could be subjected to federal supervision if the courts determine the Texas legislature targeted minority voters in passing the law.

The court also declined to identify a remedy to the Section 2 violation, saying only it “must be tailored to rectify only the discriminatory effect on those voters who do not have SB 14 ID or are unable to reasonably obtain such identification.”

Rick Hasen, a professor and election law expert at UC Irvine School of Law, wrote on Election Law Blog that Texas is unlikely to appeal the ruling to the Supreme Court.

Follow Kevin on Twitter

Send tips to kevin@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.