California’s new universal health care passed the Senate in a Thursday vote, and drew criticism from the unlikeliest of places: Democrats.
One in particular dropped this bomb, “We are not debating single payer today because we are not debating a funding source.” Democratic Sen. Ben Hueso told the Sacramento Bee. “We are not debating delivery of service. We are not debating where the health savings will come from. None of that is in the bill. This is the Senate kicking the can down the road to the Assembly and asking the Assembly to fill in all the rest of the blanks.”
Hueso’s fellow Democratic Sen. Steve Glazer called the Senate’s approval “premature.” He argued that the best course was to hold off on the vote, “finish the policy work” and put the proposal on the ballot in 2018, according to the Mercury News.
Democratic Sen. Richard Pan joined Hueso and Glazer in withholding his support saying he wasn’t comfortable voting for the bill in its current form.
While the majority of California’s Democratic senators approved the bill, senators on both sides of the aisle wanted to know how the financially strapped state will pay for the new system.
The bill, which would eliminate California’s private health care market, passed the senate on a 23-14 vote, it will now move to the Assembly.
Under the proposed plan, the government would act as the “single payer” negotiating prices with doctors, drug companies and other providers. The legislation also extends coverage to all Californians regardless of immigration status or income.
While the bill lays out how the universal system would operate, it does nothing to explain how the state will cover the cost, which, according to a recent cost assessment, will exceed $400 billion.
The bill’s sponsor, the California Nurses Association, commissioned a study which projected the universal health care system would cost California tax payers an additional $106 billion, which the study suggests could be covered through a sales tax hike and an additional tax on corporate revenue.
Critics of the study pointed out that it assumes the state will continue to receive $225 billion in existing state and federal health care funding, a dubious assumption considering the Trump administration’s budget proposal, which cuts Obamacare payouts by $1.25 trillion over the next 10 years.
The study also factors in a savings of $75 billion that the study’s authors, University of Massachusetts-Amherst economists, claim the state will save through increased efficiency and negotiating lower drug prices. (RELATED: Can A New Tax Pay For Universal Health Care In California?)
Republican Sen. Ted Gaines joined his democratic colleague Ben Hueso in pointing out the obvious flaw in the proposed legislation.
“I can’t think of a more effective way to cripple the state financially than to charge ahead with what appears to be a reckless plan,” Gaines told the Sacramento Bee.
Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact email@example.com.