Conservative Leaders Coalesce To Cry Foul Over Social Media Censorship

[Shutterstock - Veselin Borishev]

Daily Caller News Foundation logo
Eric Lieberman Managing Editor
Font Size:

More than 60 conservative leaders, some more prominent than others, published a joint statement Tuesday arguing big tech companies need to do more to ensure people aren’t being unduly silenced for their ideological viewpoints.

“Social media censorship and online restriction of conservatives and their organizations have reached a crisis level,” the message reads. “Conservative leaders now have banded together to call for equal treatment on tech and social media.”

Signees of the missive include: Texas Republican Rep. Lamar Smith, who is also chair of the Media Fairness Caucus; Young America’s Foundation President Ron Robinson; Retired Army Lt. Col. and former Republican congressman Allen West; president of the Heartland Institute and former House representative Tim Huelskamp; Penny Young Nance of Concerned Women for America, and several past higher-ups in former President Ronald Reagan’s administration.

The coalition enumerates four key areas of improvement:

First, social media companies should “provide transparency,” they argue.

“We need detailed information so everyone can see if liberal groups and users are being treated the same as those on the right,” the statement reads. “Social media companies operate in a black-box environment, only releasing anecdotes about reports on content and users when they think it necessary.”

Second, relevant firms should “provide clarity on ‘Hate Speech,'” the conservative factions wrote, arguing such an ill-defined term, and enforcement of such, is liable to subjectivity and thus is often unequally applied.

“Today, hate speech means anything liberals don’t like.”

Third and fourth, it wants Facebook, Twitter, Google, Google-owned YouTube and the like “to provide equal footing for conservatives” and “mirror the First Amendment.”

As mentioned within the text, the statement comes after Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg testified on Capitol Hill to answer a number of questions pertaining to the company’s conduct and how its platform is internally operated and externally manipulated. Multiple Republican lawmakers grilled the tech executive for a bevy of censorship accusations.

Republican Sen. Ted Cruz in particular took some serious shots at Facebook, rattling off a number of apparent examples. One of the referenced instances, the allegations surrounding Trump-supporting Diamond and Silk, even sparked a follow-up hearing — specifically about potential political bias at social media firms. But while that hearing did address a few important points, like a private company’s legal liability in this respect, it was an overall mess, veering off course of its original goal. Diamond and Silk may even have committed perjury in the process — although the enforcement of that possible violation is dubious. (RELATED: Are Faulty Algorithms, Not Liberal Bias, To Blame For Google’s Fact-Check Mess?)

Facebook prematurely launched a new feature Tuesday that aims to combat hate speech. The rollout was due to a bug, a spokeswoman at the company told The Daily Caller News Foundation. Yet it showed an increased appetite, perhaps due to intensified public pressure, to do something about vitriolic and potentially racist content found on the platform. But as evident from the statement, there is also an insistence to stop moderating content as much as it has been because large portions of the public — mainly conservatives and libertarians — feel as if they are being unfairly singled out.

Follow Eric on Twitter

Send tips to

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact