- EPA rebutted a recent CNN report claiming the agency was allowing “more pollution.”
- CNN’s article centers on a technical memo EPA says the news outlet misconstrued.
- “[W]e have fact-checked seven errors found in the report,” EPA said in a statement.
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is pushing back on a CNN article claiming the agency was “quietly telling states they can pollute more.”
“Despite spending nearly two hours with EPA Clean Air Act experts on the phone and receiving numerous pages of email responses, CNN failed to report virtually any of the facts provided in detail,” EPA said in an emailed statement.
“This is a great disservice to the public who now believe EPA is ordering states to ‘pollute more,'” the agency said.
CNN published its article Wednesday, citing an EPA technical guidance memo published online on potential ways states could comply with federal regulations regarding air pollution crossing over state borders.
EPA said CNN’s story inaccurately represented what the memo was all about. EPA emailed a list of “fact-checked” claims to reporters on Thursday. (RELATED: California Continues Its Fall From The Top Ranks Of Oil-Producing States, New Data Shows)
“Due to the numerous errors in the article, we have fact-checked seven errors found in the report so that the public may better understand the nature of the memo and EPA’s collaboration with state environmental regulators in addressing cross-border pollution,” EPA said in its email.
The central claim of CNN’s story was the memo “introduces the idea of increasing the threshold for how much smog a state can dump on its neighbors — known as cross-state pollution — before taking action to reduce emissions.”
EPA’s memo is meant to help states work on plans for how they will meet so-called “good neighbor” obligations as part of ozone, or smog, regulations imposed during the Obama administration in 2015.
Under former Administrator Scott Pruitt, EPA tried to delay implementation of the 2015 ozone regulations, but were beaten back after legal challenges from environmental groups. Opponents of the 2015 rule said it would be one of the most expensive air quality rules ever created.
Pruitt resigned in July amid a flurry of ethics scandals. Andrew Wheeler took over the agency as acting administrator on Pruitt’s departure, though President Donald Trump hinted he could nominate Wheeler as administrator.
EPA would raise that threshold from 0.7 parts per billion to one part per billion, meaning “a state can emit 43% more pollution across state lines than before,” CNN reported. The article also quotes environmentalists critical of Trump administration policies.
EPA took particular issue with that claim, saying its memo “does not establish a ‘new one part per billion standard,’ but identifies potential technical approaches that a state may wish to choose when drafting their implementation plans.”
The memo “lets states know how EPA expects to review state plans and what state analysis EPA thinks may be appropriate to include in those plans,” the agency said. EPA has final approval over the implementation of state pollution plans, the agency said
“CNN’s math is absolutely incorrect, as multiple rounds of EPA analytical work suggest that virtually the entire U.S. will meet the health-protective ozone standards established by the Obama Administration at level requisite to protect public health with an adequate margin of safety for sensitive population,” EPA said.
“CNN also ignores that the provision it’s reporting on addresses only one potential technical approach for only one of the four steps states will analyze in addressing their ‘good neighbor’ obligations,” EPA added.
Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact email@example.com.