Guns and Gear

It’s Been A Decade, But This Justice Is Still Hopping Mad About Historic Second Amendment Ruling

Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Daily Caller News Foundation logo
Kevin Daley Supreme Court correspondent
Font Size:

Retired Justice John Paul Stevens called the 2008 District of Columbia v. Heller decision the worst ruling of his tenure on the Supreme Court in a Tuesday essay in The Atlantic.

Stevens, 99, wrote the main dissent in Heller, which affirmed the right to possess firearms in the home for self defense, and has harshly criticized the decision since he left the Supreme Court in 2010.

“Their twin failure — first, the misreading of the intended meaning of the Second Amendment, and second, the failure to respect settled precedent — represents the worst self-inflicted wound in the Court’s history,” Stevens wrote in Tuesday’s essay.

The essay accompanies the release of a Stevens memoir called “The Making of a Justice: Reflections on My First 94 Years.” The book, published Tuesday, reveals new details about the court’s deliberations during the Heller case, a rare inside account of internal business that is sometimes inscrutable even to the closest observers.

In an unusual move, Stevens circulated a draft dissent among his fellow justices long before the late Justice Antonin Scalia finished his majority opinion. Stevens said he hoped to persuade Justices Anthony Kennedy or Clarence Thomas to change their votes — Kennedy being especially attentive to the human dimensions of a case and Thomas a careful student of history. (RELATED: Democratic Efforts To Pack The Supreme Court Just Hit A Big Wall: Public Opinion)

Retired Justice John Paul Stevens speaks about gun laws at a luncheon hosted by the Brady Campaign Center to Prevent Gun Violence on October 15, 2012 in Washington, D.C (Mark Wilson/Getty Images)

Retired Justice John Paul Stevens speaks about gun laws at a luncheon hosted by the Brady Campaign Center to Prevent Gun Violence on Oct. 15, 2012 in Washington, D.C (Mark Wilson/Getty Images)

Though his efforts were unsuccessful, Stevens said he managed to extract some concessions from the majority to ensure the decision would not eviscerate gun control measures. Indeed, lower courts have cited Heller while upholding gun control laws in the years after Heller.

Stevens has urged aggressive action to overturn Heller since leaving the court, going so far as counseling a full repeal of the Second Amendment in a March 2018 New York Times op-ed.

“I have written in other contexts that an amendment to the Constitution to overrule Heller is desperately needed to prevent tragedies such as the massacre of 20 grammar-school children at Sandy Hook Elementary School on December 14, 2012, from ever happening again,” Stevens wrote Tuesday.

Follow Kevin on Twitter

Send tips to

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact