Court Backs Move To Cancel Net Neutrality, Calling Critics’ Arguments Opposing FCC’s Repeal ‘Unconvincing’

(Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)

Daily Caller News Foundation logo
Chris White Tech Reporter
Font Size:

The Federal Communications Commission acted lawfully when it nixed the net neutrality rules two years ago, dealing a blow to activists who argued the repeal was a giveaway to the telecommunications industry, a federal appeals court ruled Tuesday.

The court sided with the FCC and its chair Ajit Pai, finding that net neutrality supporters had made “unconvincing” arguments in their efforts to override the FCC’s move to remove the regulation.

While the ruling was a boon for the FCC, it also overruled the agency’s effort to prohibit states from creating their own net neutrality rules, a move that could spur states such as California to act. (RELATED: Justice Department Sues California Over Its Net Neutrality Law)

“We are very pleased by today’s decision,” an FCC senior official said in a phone conference Tuesday after the court made its ruling. The official noted the FCC is not yet able to determine whether it will appeal the decision to prevent the agency from blocking state-created net neutrality rules.

Net neutrality advocates rally in front of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) ahead of Thursday’s expected FCC vote repealing so-called net neutrality rules in Washington, U.S., December 13, 2017. REUTERS/Yuri Gripas/File Photo

Pai moved to repeal of the government’s net neutrality rules in 2017. Federal open internet protections had prevented internet service providers from slowing down access to web content, or charging for faster delivery of certain services.

Activists often characterize ISPs as a driveway connecting a home to the vast network of portals on the internet, while net neutrality, they say, is the principle preventing providers from charging a high fee for some traffic. Many people who oppose providing the government more authority over bandwidth say that’s not an apt description.

Former FCC Chairman Michael Powell, for instance, frequently pushed back against that characterization. “Americans have never known anything but an open Internet,” Powell said during a press conference in 2017, noting an open internet was a concept woven into how the internet was designed.

More than 22 states’ attorneys general, along with cities and various internet companies, sued the FCC. Big tech companies like Facebook and Google also filed supportive briefs through their Washington lobbying group, the Internet Association (IA).

“The internet industry shares the view of an overwhelming majority of Americans that net neutrality protections are critical to the future of a free and open internet,” IA President Michael Beckerman said in a statement to the media following the decision.

He added: “IA and our member companies will continue to fight for nationwide, strong, enforceable net neutrality protections that ban blocking, throttling, and paid prioritization through Congress and at the FCC.”

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact