Big Tent Ideas

WILLIAMS: There’s An Ideological Grooming Problem On America’s Military Bases

Mark Wilson/Getty Images

Daily Caller News Foundation logo
Ryan P. Williams President, Claremont Institute
Font Size:

Educators and administrators running K-12 education on America’s military bases are indoctrinating the children of military personnel in radical gender ideology, critical race theory and left-wing activism. In a new Claremont Institute investigative report, my colleague Scott Yenor and I document this latest evolution in America’s culture war.

This development at military-run schools tracks broader trends in American education. In recent months, Chris Rufo has exposed the rampant woke indoctrination occurring in our nation’s K-12 schools, with striking examples from Los AngelesPortland and San Diego. In 2020, Rod Dreher wrote about the creeping woke rot at America’s oldest military academy.

In 2021, America witnessed the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Mark Milley, express to Congress a desire to know more about “white rage.” Until controversy led the Navy to change its reading list, it recommended that officers and sailors read the latest racialized pseudo-science from left-wing academics. (RELATED: SHEFFIELD: Americans Should Be Asking Themselves One Key Question Ahead Of November)

Through a whistleblower, the Claremont Institute obtained over 50 videos from a recent “Equity and Access” educational summit hosted under the U.S. Department of Defense Education Activity (“DoDEA”). The DoDEA runs 160 schools on military bases and educates 69,000 students across the globe.

We learned that educators at military bases are pushing radical gender ideology that seeks to unsettle and disrupt gender identity starting in kindergarten. A seventh-grade humanities teacher from a military base in Spain said that “Kids as young as 4 years old are already starting to develop a stable understanding of their gender identity. So elementary school is the perfect time because you can really show students the diversity of gender expression and gender activity.”

Later in the presentation it’s made explicit that educational activities about gender expression and identity are particularly important precisely because parents often disapprove of such instruction. This is the new core of pedagogical indoctrination in America: what happens at school, stays at school.

In previous generations, parents were informed frequently by teachers about lesson plans and classroom happenings; these days, parents are kept in the dark as possible enemies, as the teachers are the only “experts” competent to guide children on such sensitive matters as gender and sexuality.

Educators are also pushing the themes of Critical Race Theory and “antiracism” popularized by academic activists like Ibram X. Kendi. The main assumption of such education is that all differences in group outcomes — e.g., in social welfare, economic success, educational attainment, health outcomes, etc.— must be due to racism. As Kendi has put it: “racial inequity is evidence of racist policy.”

One of the presenters, an educator at an army base in Italy, used the example of one of his students complaining about the history of great inventors in America — because the inventors were overwhelmingly white. If inventors are disproportionately white this must be evidence of racism, even if there is no evidence of any racist policy driving the unequal results.

The educators featured in our report would no doubt defend their recommendations on gender expression and identity as benign and even beneficial attempts to promote “inclusion.” Similarly, they would defend discussions of “white privilege” and “systemic racism” as merely discussions of the history of race and racism in America.

But as scholar James Lindsay has documented tirelessly, sowing confusion about gender, dividing children from parents, teaching that racism is pervasive and color-blindness impossible, and dividing children by race into classes of oppressors and oppressed — these are all neo-Marxist techniques meant to undermine the traditional American regard for constitutionalism and replace it with race-centered redistributionism.

This is not education, it’s ideological grooming. Rather than learning objective facts about the world or how to be civic-minded Americans, students are encouraged to transform themselves and their environment in the service of revolutionary ideologies about gender and race. Whether they know it or not, these teachers and the DoDEA that employs them are useful idiots in a revolutionary and anti-American project with deep left-wing intellectual roots.

As the U.S. Senate takes up the National Defense Authorization Act in the coming weeks and months, legislators ought to take a very close look at what we’re teaching the children of our military personnel overseas.

Ryan P. Williams is President of the Claremont Institute and publisher of the Claremont Review of Books and The American Mind.

The views and opinions expressed in this commentary are those of the author and do not reflect the official position of the Daily Caller News Foundation.

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.