WASHINGTON (AP) — One potential juror was questioned for 68 minutes. Another for 64 — and he didn’t even make the cut. Along the way, Roger Clemens’ lawyer offered some clues as to his strategy once testimony gets under way, including a challenge to whether Congress had a legitimate purpose in holding the hearing at which the seven-time Cy Young Award winner testified — and whether Clemens’ testimony was voluntary.
The laborious task of selecting a jury for the Clemens retrial resumed Tuesday and might not be done by the end of the week, with the judge and lawyers for both sides parsing prospects’ thoughts on topics as disparate as Barry Bonds and Lance Armstrong, Twitter and the reputation of the Justice Department.
“To be completely honest, I dislike Barry Bonds. … Truthfully, I believe he actually did it. I believe he used drugs,” said one man, a graphic designer who nevertheless was asked to return after he expressed neutral feelings about Clemens.
The court is narrowing the initial jury pool of 90 down to 36, from which to select the final 12 jurors and four alternates who will decide whether Clemens lied when he denied using steroids and human growth hormone before a U.S. House committee in February 2008. The extra 20 are needed because Clemens’ lawyers are allowed to strike 12 and prosecutors, eight — without giving any reason.
By the end of the second day, only 32 Washingtonians had been questioned, with 15 — 11 women and four men — meeting the initial approval of U.S. District Judge Reggie Walton.
Jury selection will continue at least through Thursday, and no session is scheduled for Friday. Even the judge’s “10-minute break” in the morning ended up lasting 25 minutes.
“Things aren’t going as fast as I thought,” Walton said early in the afternoon.
Finding potential jurors without some preconceived opinion about the case — or whether it’s worth the time and expense for the government to pursue it — has been challenging. Among those who were excused was the woman who told the judge: “I feel like I know too much.” She said she had discussed the case with friends and added: “I frankly question the legitimacy of bringing this to this court.”
It was during questioning of one potential juror that Clemens’ attorney Rusty Hardin raised the issue of whether Clemens truly “voluntarily appeared” before Congress. Clemens was not subpoenaed to testify at the 2008 hearing, and the government has always maintained that he testified on his own will.
Clemens’ lawyers also filed a memo with the court that argued the government must show that the hearing was a “competent tribunal.” The memo listed a dozen “examples of Congressional conduct that exceeds the power to investigate,” including “asking a witness to appear before a committee to give him an opportunity to tell his side of the story.”
“There’s going to be a challenge by the defense as to the propriety of the hearing … and the way it was conducted,” Hardin told one juror.
Clemens, wearing a dark pinstriped suit and red tie, remained silent during the proceedings, listening to the questioning and often looking at notes.
Among the potential jurors asked to return was lawyer who is a distant relative of Hall of Fame pitcher Bob Feller. Among those excused was a woman who realized serving on the case might lead to domestic disharmony.
“You’re in that Clemens case, aren’t you?” she said her husband asked as they rode in the car after Monday’s session.
“Judge said for me not to talk about this,” she said she answered.
“We did not talk the whole night,” the woman said. “I said, ‘This ain’t going to work in my house.'”
Associated Press writer Frederic J. Frommer contributed to this report.
Follow Fred Frommer at http://twitter.com/ffrommer
Follow Joseph White at http://twitter.com/JGWhiteAP