Chuck Hagel: the darling of Tehran

Kenneth Timmerman President, Foundation for Democracy in Iran
Font Size:

The Iranian regime loves Chuck Hagel.

Iran’s official English-language propaganda outlet, Press TV, has suggested that President Obama picked Hagel to be his secretary of defense because he wants Hagel to help craft a “grand bargain with Iran” — you know, the type of deal that would cement in place the clerical dictatorship, spell the end of any hope for U.S. support to the pro-freedom movement, and allow the regime to continue enriching uranium with no verifiable limits.

Another regime publication called Hagel’s selection “a message of peace from the Obama administration to the Islamic Republic of Iran,” and admiringly quoted Hagel as claiming sanctions on Iran “will only lead to U.S. isolation.”

Here in the United States, the pro-Tehran lobby was quick to champion Hagel’s cause. Trita Parsi, the president of the National Iranian American Council (NIAC), argued that Hagel deserved support because he would oppose the “extremist pro-Likud circles … who are seeking to establish a veto on U.S. national security policy.”

Such language, of course, is just a variation on Hagel’s own rant against the influence of the “Jewish lobby” on U.S. politics.

Over the years, Hagel developed a relationship with the American-Iranian Council, a precursor to NIAC. Both groups oppose U.S. sanctions on Iran, support Iranian trade with U.S. businesses, and promote unconditional U.S. negotiations with the Iranian regime over its nuclear program.

These are precisely the changes in U.S. policy that the Iranian regime is seeking. As a U.S. senator, Hagel actively supported all three.

In July 2001, Hagel was one of just two U.S. senators to oppose renewing the original Iran-Libya Sanctions Act (ILSA). This was the initial effort by Congress to put pressure on the Iranian regime by imposing sanctions on foreign energy companies investing in Iran’s oil and gas sector.

Hagel’s backers have claimed the senator only opposed unilateral U.S. sanctions. But Hagel’s statements and actions both in the Senate and beyond suggest otherwise.

In June 2001 and again in March 2002, he addressed conferences sponsored by the American-Iranian Council in Washington to emphasize the need for the U.S. to abandon sanctions and open trade with Iran.

From 2006 to 2008, he opposed numerous bills and resolutions that would have stepped up pressure on the Iranian regime, including an October 2006 measure calling on the European Union to join the U.S. in placing the Iranian-backed Hezbollah terrorist group on its terrorism list.

In October 2008, he used a Senate privilege to single-handedly kill broad bipartisan legislation, the Iran Counter-Proliferation Act, to extend U.S. sanctions and harmonize them with measures then in place worldwide as a result of United Nations Security Council resolutions — about as multilateral as you can get.

Rather than sanctions, Hagel has favored a policy of outreach, negotiation, and accommodation with the Iranian regime regardless of the regime’s actions against the United States, U.S. allies, or its own people.

In May 2007 — less than one year after Hezbollah provoked a war in Lebanon at the instigation of Tehran — Hagel joined Senators Joe Biden and Arlen Specter in addressing a formal invitation to the speaker of the Islamic Republic parliament to meet with U.S. officials.

Later that year, Hagel sent a private letter to President Bush, urging him to engage in “direct talks” with the Iranian regime. The goal of such talks was to dispel the notion “that the United States’ actual objective is regime change in Iran, not a change of Iran’s behavior,” Hagel wrote.

In September 2007, Hagel joined just 15 other senators in opposing a bill to add the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) to the State Department’s list of international terrorist organizations because of its involvement in murdering U.S. troops in Iraq.

Hagel’s supporters write, “In an interview on Nov. 9, 2007, Hagel told the Lincoln Journal Star that he feared the Bush administration might use the Senate resolution on Iran as cover for a military attack.” But as a member of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, Hagel knew full well that the soon-to-be released National Intelligence Estimate on Iran would impose an insurmountable roadblock to any such plans, if they did indeed exist.

Congress has been instrumental in helping steer the Obama administration toward policies to increase pressure on the Islamic regime in Tehran, while expanding on work done by the two previous administrations to build an international coalition to slow down the emergence of a nuclear-armed Iranian regime.

Chuck Hagel opposed these polices when he was in the U.S. Senate, and has continued to do so since then.

As Tehran’s best friend in Washington, he is exactly the wrong person to be President Obama’s man at the Pentagon.

Kenneth R. Timmerman is the founder and President of the Foundation for Democracy in Iran (iran.org), and the author of “Countdown to Crisis: the Coming Nuclear Showdown with Iran.”