Wendell Berry Sues The University Of Kentucky Over Removal Of Controversial Mural

Andy Lyons/Getty Images

Daily Caller News Foundation logo
Neil Shah Contributor
Font Size:

Renowned Kentucky author Wendell Berry and his wife sued the University of Kentucky Monday over its plan to remove a century-old mural containing controversial images of black and American Indian individuals.

The lawsuit seeks to prevent the university from “taking any action on [university president Eli Capilouto’s] vague public announcement to remove or take down” the mural and an associated piece of art near it.

The lawsuit cites several reasons why the artwork should stay up: the federal commission of the artwork in 1930, the difficulty of painting a Mexican-style fresco, the fact that the painting is plastered on the wall and removing it would do irreparable damage to the artwork, and the painting’s established “non-racist purpose.”

Wendell Berry’s wife, Tanya Berry, is the niece and oldest living heir of artist Ann Rice O’Hanlon who painted the mural.

O’Hanlon painted the mural, commissioned during the Great Depression through a federal program called the Public Works of Art Project (PWAP), in Memorial Hall of the University of Kentucky.

Her purpose was to depict a uniquely “American scene,” conveying the American way of life while paying homage to the history of Kentucky and acknowledging the social and racial inequities in society during that time, according to the university website.

The mural has caused controversy among many UK students of color for its depiction of black individuals working in a field and an American Indian holding a tomahawk. In response to these concerns from UK students, the university commissioned black artist Karyn Olivier in 2018 to paint another mural, across O’Hanlon’s existing piece, to start a conversation about the controversial depictions. (RELATED: Biden Supports Removing Confederate Statues, Wants To Keep Washington And Jefferson)

UK President Eli Capilouto wrote in an open letter in early June that “Our efforts and solutions with the mural, for many of our students, have been a roadblock to reconciliation, rather than a path toward healing. That’s not a criticism. It is a statement of fact and, I hope, understanding.”

“The mural once again was a symbol, not of a state’s evolution, but of our unwillingness to recognize [African-American] experiences as members of our community,” he wrote.

In response to the lawsuit by the Berrys, the University of Kentucky released a statement Monday acknowledging Berry’s contribution to art and literature and the state of Kentucky, but added that “moving art… is not erasing history…It is, rather, creating context to further dialogue as well as space for healing.”

The mural has another supporter in Karyn Olivier, a black artist who was commissioned to paint a “Witness” in 2018 as a response to the O’Hanlon mural, according to the university’s website.

In an open letter to UK students in April, Olivier said that “erasing and (in effect) defacing a work of art is a less powerful gesture than confronting what is there. We must dissect and critique our American histories, shed light on what’s hidden/buried, and expose this complicated landscape for all to investigate and interrogate.”

The University of Kentucky has not yet announced a timeline for removing the Memorial Hall mural.

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact