DOJ Prosecutors Slam Trump’s Motion Asking Judge To Recuse From His Case: ‘No Improper Bias’

(Photo by Joe Raedle/Getty Images)

Daily Caller News Foundation logo
Font Size:

Special Counsel Jack Smith’s office defended on Thursday the federal judge overseeing former President Donald Trump’s 2020 election interference case after Trump motioned for her to recuse.

Prosecutors wrote in a 20-page court filing that there is “no valid basis” for U.S. District Court Judge Tanya Chutkan to recuse, arguing that Trump “cherry-picks” statements from two Jan. 6 case sentencing transcripts that demonstrate “no improper bias or prejudgment of the current case.” Trump’s Monday motion alleged that Chutkan’s comments in two prior cases involving Jan. 6 defendants are “disqualifying” because they “suggested Trump should be prosecuted and imprisoned.”

“The defendant has failed to identify anything approaching the clear and convincing evidence necessary to overcome the presumption of impartiality,” prosecutors wrote. “Instead, he has relied on suggestion and innuendo to insinuate something sinister in the Court simply doing its job by addressing sentencing arguments.” (RELATED: Trump Asks Judge To Recuse Herself From 2020 Election Case)

Special counsel Jack Smith arrives to speak to the press at the US Department of Justice building in Washington, DC, on August 1, 2023. Donald Trump was indicted on August 1, 2023 over his efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 election -- the most serious legal threat yet to the former president as he campaigns to return to the White House. (Photo by SAUL LOEB / AFP) (Photo by SAUL LOEB/AFP via Getty Images)

Special counsel Jack Smith arrives to speak to the press at the US Department of Justice building in Washington, DC, on August 1, 2023. (Photo by SAUL LOEB / AFP)

Trump’s filing pointed to a statement Chutkan made in an October 2022 case where she said those who rioted on Jan. 6 were showing “blind loyalty to one person who, by the way, remains free to this day.”

In December 2021, Chutkan told Jan. 6 defendant Robert Scott Palmer “you have made a very good point, one that has been made before — that the people who exhorted you and encouraged you and rallied you to go and take action and to fight have not been charged,” according to the transcript. Chutkan said afterwards the decision to charge was “not before” her and that her opinions “are not relevant.”

“In both instances, the Court was appropriately responding to and ultimately rejecting— a common argument raised by scores of January 6 offenders: that they deserved leniency because their actions were inspired by, or were not as serious as, those of others who contributed to the riot but had not been held responsible including former president Donald J. Trump, the defendant in this case,” prosecutors wrote.

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact