US

Trump Makes Case For Why Court’s Gag Order Is ‘Unconstitutional’

Curtis Means-Pool/Getty Images

Daily Caller News Foundation logo
Font Size:

Former President Donald Trump told a federal appeals court Wednesday that District Court Judge Tanya Chutkan “lacks the authority to muzzle” his speech by issuing a gag order.

Trump’s lawyers filed the first brief in his appeal of Chutkan’s gag order Wednesday, arguing that that court “cannot silence President Trump based solely on the anticipated reaction of his audiences.” The United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia temporarily paused the gag order last week to consider Trump’s request for a longer freeze pending his appeal.

“The district court lacks the authority to muzzle the core political speech of the leading candidate for President at the height of his re-election campaign,” Trump’s lawyers wrote. “President Trump is entitled to proclaim, and the American public is entitled to hear, his core political messages.”

His lawyers allege that the order not only suppresses Trump’s First Amendment rights but also the rights of “tens of millions of Americans to engage in and hear core political speech in the middle of an ongoing Presidential campaign.” Further, they argue that it is “unconstitutionally vague” in its use of the word “target” and inclusion of any “reasonably foreseeable witness.” (RELATED: ‘Uncharted Territory’: Obama-Appointed Judge’s Gag Order On Trump Is The First Of Its Kind, Legal Experts Say)

CLEVELAND, OH – JULY 21: Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump gives two thumbs up to the crowd during the evening session on the fourth day of the Republican National Convention on July 21, 2016 at the Quicken Loans Arena in Cleveland, Ohio. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

“The discovery in this case comprises nearly 13 million pages and references hundreds of individuals,” the brief states. “It is anyone’s guess which witnesses may be ‘reasonably foreseeable’ at this stage, and this future-looking standard invites impermissible enforcement-by-hindsight.”

If the appeals court decides to affirm any portion of the lower court’s order, Trump requested it extend its pause for seven days to allow time for him to file an emergency application with the Supreme Court.

The court has scheduled oral arguments to hear his appeal for Nov. 20.

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.