Opinion

No tears and sweetheart deals for JP Morgan

Joseph R. Mason Senior Fellow, Wharton School
Font Size:

The potential settlement announced between the Department of Justice and J.P. Morgan Chase over the weekend was received initially with great fanfare and relief. This wasn’t surprising considering that the settlement was the largest of its kind ever orchestrated – $13 billion – combined with the prospect that it would resolve a number of pending legal claims that have weighed down financial institutions and slowed economic growth. However, once the details of the settlement began to emerge, both the news-reading public and market participants turned sour on the deal.

Initially, most people assumed the settlement was structured to address mortgage-backed securities and loan sale lawsuits initiated by the government against banks. For example, in 2011, the Federal Housing Finance Administration (FHFA), which regulates government-sponsored enterprises like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, filed suit against JP Morgan claiming two of its subsidiaries – Washington Mutual (WaMu) and Bear Stearns – misled Fannie and Freddie about the quality of some $33 billion in investments it sold them. These investments, which were comprised of thousands of mortgages pooled together, contained hidden delinquencies, defaults, and foreclosures. They were assets that were sold to Fannie and Freddie as AAA-rated, but were ultimately downgraded to CCC or worse.

Had the settlement been directed to Fannie, Freddie and other government institutions, there wouldn’t have been much concern outside a relatively small cadre of current investors. But there was more.

In the midst of the financial meltdown in 2008, as the value of WaMu and Bear Stearns was imploding, the FDIC orchestrated JP Morgan’s acquisition of both banks for pennies on the dollar. This was universally acknowledged as a “fire sale,” in recognition of the liabilities (legal and otherwise) that would be assumed by JPM in order to continue the banks’ business.

After the sale, WaMu’s holding company, which was never purchased by JP Morgan, filed for bankruptcy and was liquidated. Immediately JP Morgan tried to lay claim to the holding company’s assets, which were valued at $20 billion; FDIC disagreed and lawsuits ensued.

Most of the dispute was resolved in a February 2012 settlement that produced a head-turning, one-time gain of $1 billion for JP Morgan. Roughly $2.7 billion still remains to be distributed by the FDIC from the bank receivership. Now JP Morgan is arguing that its liabilities stemming from its purchase of Washington Mutual should be paid from the receivership as well. If it succeeds, it would effectively be giving JP Morgan Washington Mutual for free!

Worse, the $2.7 billion is specifically for private claims of bank creditors who lent money to Washington Mutual before it failed. So JP Morgan is essentially attempting to use the DOJ settlement to grab the value of assets it did not purchase from Washington Mutual after the FDIC has worked to liquidate them, and it is doing so at great cost to taxpayers and other bank creditors who invested in good faith.

But it doesn’t end there. JP Morgan is also negotiating for relief from criminal prosecution for a variety of claims unrelated to the DOJ settlement such as LIBOR, the energy market, and potentially Foreign Exchange market rigging. These aspects reflect ongoing difficulties at the financial institution as it continues to struggle to digest its acquisitions and tighten operational controls in a post-bubble world.

Despite popular thinking, JP Morgan’s acquisition of Washington Mutual was a “favor” to no one. It was a shrewd opportune business decision resulting in hundreds of billions of dollars in assets and potential earnings that enriched shareholders, provided extended retail reach, built a nationwide portfolio, and fueled profit margins that now run into multiple billions of dollars. On this, JP Morgan CEO Jamie Dimon has served his constituents well. However, the DOJ also has an obligation to consider the impact any settlement would have on its constituents, namely the FDIC and taxpayers.

The government must ensure that any final settlement with JP Morgan does not create the liquidation environment that led directly to the sweetheart deals JP Morgan took advantage of in the first place. Another sweetheart deal would establish a dangerous precedent that would undermine the FDIC’s reliability as a receiver. It would spook not only bank investors, who would envision value drained away from them during future bailouts, but also bank purchasers, who would fear exposure to whimsical interpretation of their purchase agreements after the fact.

Crisis-era litigation is a drag on economic growth, so it’s important that the government and JP Morgan reach a speedy and equitable settlement that more accurately compensates investors and taxpayers for the damage done by reckless lending. But JP Morgan cannot be allowed to raid the FDIC through Washington Mutual’s receivership, while receiving a full pardon for all of their potential criminal misdeeds, just for the sake of a speedy resolution.

Dr. Mason is Endowed Chair of Banking at Louisiana State University. He has served as an expert witness for the government in the Department of Justice’s suit against Bank of America.

Tags : j p morgan
Joseph R. Mason

PREMIUM ARTICLE: Subscribe To Keep Reading

Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!

Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!

Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!

Sign Up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
BENEFITS READERS PASS PATRIOTS FOUNDERS
Daily and Breaking Newsletters
Daily Caller Shows
Ad Free Experience
Exclusive Articles
Custom Newsletters
Editor Daily Rundown
Behind The Scenes Coverage
Award Winning Documentaries
Patriot War Room
Patriot Live Chat
Exclusive Events
Gold Membership Card
Tucker Mug

What does Founders Club include?

Tucker Mug and Membership Card
Founders

Readers,

Instead of sucking up to the political and corporate powers that dominate America, The Daily Caller is fighting for you — our readers. We humbly ask you to consider joining us in this fight.

Now that millions of readers are rejecting the increasingly biased and even corrupt corporate media and joining us daily, there are powerful forces lined up to stop us: the old guard of the news media hopes to marginalize us; the big corporate ad agencies want to deprive us of revenue and put us out of business; senators threaten to have our reporters arrested for asking simple questions; the big tech platforms want to limit our ability to communicate with you; and the political party establishments feel threatened by our independence.

We don't complain -- we can't stand complainers -- but we do call it how we see it. We have a fight on our hands, and it's intense. We need your help to smash through the big tech, big media and big government blockade.

We're the insurgent outsiders for a reason: our deep-dive investigations hold the powerful to account. Our original videos undermine their narratives on a daily basis. Even our insistence on having fun infuriates them -- because we won’t bend the knee to political correctness.

One reason we stand apart is because we are not afraid to say we love America. We love her with every fiber of our being, and we think she's worth saving from today’s craziness.

Help us save her.

A second reason we stand out is the sheer number of honest responsible reporters we have helped train. We have trained so many solid reporters that they now hold prominent positions at publications across the political spectrum. Hear a rare reasonable voice at a place like CNN? There’s a good chance they were trained at Daily Caller. Same goes for the numerous Daily Caller alumni dominating the news coverage at outlets such as Fox News, Newsmax, Daily Wire and many others.

Simply put, America needs solid reporters fighting to tell the truth or we will never have honest elections or a fair system. We are working tirelessly to make that happen and we are making a difference.

Since 2010, The Daily Caller has grown immensely. We're in the halls of Congress. We're in the Oval Office. And we're in up to 20 million homes every single month. That's 20 million Americans like you who are impossible to ignore.

We can overcome the forces lined up against all of us. This is an important mission but we can’t do it unless you — the everyday Americans forgotten by the establishment — have our back.

Please consider becoming a Daily Caller Patriot today, and help us keep doing work that holds politicians, corporations and other leaders accountable. Help us thumb our noses at political correctness. Help us train a new generation of news reporters who will actually tell the truth. And help us remind Americans everywhere that there are millions of us who remain clear-eyed about our country's greatness.

In return for membership, Daily Caller Patriots will be able to read The Daily Caller without any of the ads that we have long used to support our mission. We know the ads drive you crazy. They drive us crazy too. But we need revenue to keep the fight going. If you join us, we will cut out the ads for you and put every Lincoln-headed cent we earn into amplifying our voice, training even more solid reporters, and giving you the ad-free experience and lightning fast website you deserve.

Patriots will also be eligible for Patriots Only content, newsletters, chats and live events with our reporters and editors. It's simple: welcome us into your lives, and we'll welcome you into ours.

We can save America together.

Become a Daily Caller Patriot today.

Signature

Neil Patel