Juror In Whitmer Kidnapping Trial Wanted Defendants To ‘Hang’, Was ‘Far-Left’, Defense Says

Bill Pugliano/Getty Images

Daily Caller News Foundation logo
Trevor Schakohl Legal Reporter
Font Size:

A juror who helped convict two men last month of plotting to kidnap Democratic Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer was allegedly “far-left leaning” and had said they would seek to “hang” the defendants, the defendants’ legal team alleged a witness said in a court filing this week.

A retrial jury found Adam Fox guilty Aug. 23 of conspiracy to kidnap and possession of a weapon of mass destruction, while Barry Croft Jr. was convicted of the same crimes in addition to unregistered destructive device possession. Fox and Croft’s lawyers asked Tuesday for a hearing on whether the juror committed misconduct, and a new trial because of the juror’s purported misconduct and an alleged appearance of judicial bias affecting the retrial proceedings.

In evidence presented with the filing, former Fox defense team investigator Gary Gaudard declared that one of the juror’s coworkers had said he personally knew the juror to be “far-left leaning.” According to Gaudard, the coworker claimed to have heard that the juror said Fox and Croft were “guilty, no matter what” and would “hang” if the juror was chosen for the jury. (RELATED: Gretchen Whitmer Raked In Over $1 Million From Billionaires, Celebrity Donors While Attacking Her GOP Opponent’s ‘Special Interests’ Ties)

Croft and Fox’s lawyers also said a second co-worker claimed to have heard second-hand that the juror had expressed intentions to join the jury and convict them, according to the filing. Investigators identified the second coworker Aug. 23, the day Croft and Fox were convicted, according to the filing.

The second coworker claimed that same day that the juror had reportedly contacted a family member from jury deliberations, saying the jury had reached a verdict but was yet to deliver it in court, the filing stated. The filing argued this alleged communication with a family member violated the court’s instruction.

The lawyers contended the court had unconstitutionally imposed time limits on defendants’ cross examination of witness Kaleb Franks, who had previously pleaded guilty in the case, according to Fox 17, and gave an appearance of bias impacting the jury. They said these factors and the juror’s alleged misconduct warranted a new trial.

The seal of the Federal Bureau of Investigation is seen outside of its headquarters in Washington, DC on August 15, 2022. - Threats against the FBI and law enforcement agencies have increased following the search and seizure of top secret documents from former US president Donald Trump's Mar-a-Lago estate where he resides. (Photo by MANDEL NGAN / AFP) (Photo by MANDEL NGAN/AFP via Getty Images)

The seal of the Federal Bureau of Investigation is seen outside of its headquarters in Washington, DC on August 15, 2022. MANDEL NGAN/AFP via Getty Images

During the trial, U.S. District Judge Robert Jonker had heard an allegation of a juror stating their intended verdict prior to selection, the Free Press reported. Jonker was subsequently persuaded in a seven-minute interview with the juror that they never made the alleged pre-selection comment, court records revealed.

Croft and Fox’s initial April trial did not result in a verdict against them, with two other men being acquitted, according to The Associated Press. Their defense argued the FBI entrapped them.

Croft and Fox’s lawyers did not immediately respond to the Daily Caller News Foundation’s request for comment.

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact