Supreme Court Will Decide If The Government Can Tax Income You Haven’t Received Yet

(Photo by SAUL LOEB/AFP via Getty Images)

Daily Caller News Foundation logo
Font Size:

The Supreme Court announced Monday it would take up a case considering whether Congress can tax income before it is received.

The case, Charles G. Moore et ux. v. United States, stems from a Washington state couple’s 2019 lawsuit against the government for a nearly $15,000 tax bill imposed on their small investment in an overseas company, from which they never earned a profit. It considers whether taxes on unrealized gains are legal under the 16th Amendment, which enables Congress to tax incomes “without apportionment among the several States.”

Hank Adler, Burra Executive Professor of Accounting at Chapman University, previously told the Daily Caller News Foundation the Moores’ case is “the most important tax case in almost 100 years.”

Kathleen and Charles Moore are asking for a refund on the $14,729 tax bill they received after Congress passed the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which included a one-time tax on shareholders with a 10% stake in foreign companies that earned profits regardless of whether or not those profits were received. (RELATED: Here’s How The Supreme Court Could Shatter Democrats’ Plans For A Wealth Tax)

The US Supreme Court, Washington, DC, on June 16, 2023. (Photo by SAUL LOEB/AFP via Getty Images)

The US Supreme Court is seen in Washington, DC, on June 16, 2023. The court is expected to issue rulings on some of the cases that were argued this term. (Photo by SAUL LOEB/AFP via Getty Images)

The Ninth Circuit upheld the tax, which dissenting judges said made it “the first court in the country to state that an ‘income tax’ doesn’t require that a ‘taxpayer has realized income.’”

“The Supreme Court’s decision to hear Moore v. US is very good news for Americans,” Dan Greenberg, General Counsel at the Competitive Enterprise Institute, an organization representing the Moores, said in a statement provided to the DCNF.  “A century of precedent shows that – in order to be taxed – income requires realization: this means that income taxes can only be levied on realized income. We hope that, when the Supreme Court considers Moore, it insists that its own precedents on this issue must be followed.”

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact