Editorial

Reid’s partisanship, not GOP obstructionism, killed the DREAM Act

Stewart Lawrence Stewart J. Lawrence is a Washington, D.C.-based public policy analyst who writes frequently on immigration and Latino affairs. He is also founder and managing director of Puentes & Associates, Inc., a bilingual survey research and communications firm.
Font Size:

Harry Reid’s gambit to attach the DREAM Act as an amendment to this year’s Defense Authorization Bill failed miserably last week.  Republicans, who strongly oppose DREAM as a stand-alone measure — but might one day consider it as part of broader immigration reform legislation — weren’t biting.  Reid, however, never expected them to.  He wanted Republicans to vote DREAM down so that that he could continue to paint the GOP as “anti-immigrant” with Latino voters back in Nevada.  Reid’s been in a dead-heat with Tea Party favorite Sharron Angle for months, and may well lose his seat.  Latinos comprise 22% of the Nevada electorate, and voted 3-1 for Obama in 2008.  Reid desperately needs to get them to the polls.

But unfortunately for Reid, Nevada Latinos, who stand to benefit from DREAM, aren’t much interested in his re-election bid.  They have a lot of other things on their mind this November, like double-digit unemployment, for which Reid and his Democratic colleagues have no solution.  And offering DREAM as an alternative to comprehensive immigration reform, which would include a legalization program as well as expanded border and workplace enforcement, is an insult to all voters, Latinos included.  To Reid, DREAM must have seemed like the perfect straddle — a smaller, more manageable legalization that would appeal to Latinos but one small enough, perhaps, not to alienate most Nevadans, who say they favor an Arizona-style crackdown law before any “amnesty” is considered.

What’s sad, and disturbing, is that the majority leader, like so many other Democrats, insists on putting partisan politics ahead of the broader national interest in achieving a bipartisan consensus on immigration.  Had Reid really wanted to garner GOP support, he could have allowed Republicans to offer their own amendments to the Authorization Bill, including amendments specifically relating to DREAM and more broadly to immigration.  Senator Susan Collins (R-ME), who has supported comprehensive reform in the past but is reluctant to do so now, publicly challenged Reid to open up the amendment process.  But Reid refused.  After all, this was not about making real progress on the issue.

What could Republicans offer?  Well, stepped-up border enforcement for one.  John McCain and John Kyl have been pushing for a major expansion of border enforcement, as well as a measure that would criminalize repeat border-crossers.  They tried to pass the same bill last summer, and managed to convince California Democrats Barbara Boxer and Diane Feinstein to join them.   But the measure gained only 54 votes, 6 short of the magic 60 needed.  Feinstein, in particular, is to be commended for stepping across party lines.  Boxer’s in a tough re-election race with the GOP’s Carly Fiorina, who opposes amnesty and supports expanded enforcement.  Apparently, Feinstein deliberated long and hard before siding with Boxer.  With California Democrats opposed to an Arizona-style enforcement law, supporting the McCain-Kyl bill provided a golden opportunity to demonstrate the party’s toughness on illegal immigration.  And Feinstein must have known the bill would be defeated, so her vote was largely symbolic.  But loudly so.

It turns out that McCain and Kyl were fully prepared to offer the border enforcement legislation as an amendment to the defense authorization bill, alongside of DREAM, but thanks to Reid’s intransigence, they never got the chance.  Which means we’ll never know what might have happened if Democrats and Republicans had been allowed to combine the two measures — DREAM and expanded border enforcement — as a kind of bipartisan “down payment” on immigration reform.  DREAM would give legal status to illegal aliens who migrated to the US with their parents when they were children.  Even many amnesty opponents recognize that these individuals are something of a special case.  And the numbers are small — either 800,000 or 2 million, depending on which source you consult.  If we split the difference, that’s still less than 15% of the total illegal alien population.

Despite its crushing defeat, we probably haven’t heard the last of DREAM — or of Reid’s polarizing efforts on immigration.  Reid has confided to pro-immigration activists that he may try to win on DREAM by convening a “lame duck” session of Congress in mid-November, immediately after the midterms.  The idea would be to convince Democratic and Republican senators no longer facing the threat of voter reprisals to swing their support to DREAM.  That might work with one or two of the senators who lose in November, but it’s unlikely to sway the winners let alone the 21 incumbent Democrats facing re-election in 2012.  Subverting the will of the incoming Congress by ramming through DREAM during the lame duck session could well cost them their seats.

Stewart J. Lawrence is a Washington, D.C.-based public policy analyst who writes frequently on immigration and Latino affairs. He is also founder and managing director of Puentes & Associates, Inc., a bilingual survey research and communications firm.

PREMIUM ARTICLE: Subscribe To Keep Reading

Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!

Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!

Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!

Sign Up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
BENEFITS READERS PASS PATRIOTS FOUNDERS
Daily and Breaking Newsletters
Daily Caller Shows
Ad Free Experience
Exclusive Articles
Custom Newsletters
Editor Daily Rundown
Behind The Scenes Coverage
Award Winning Documentaries
Patriot War Room
Patriot Live Chat
Exclusive Events
Gold Membership Card
Tucker Mug

What does Founders Club include?

Tucker Mug and Membership Card
Founders

Readers,

Instead of sucking up to the political and corporate powers that dominate America, The Daily Caller is fighting for you — our readers. We humbly ask you to consider joining us in this fight.

Now that millions of readers are rejecting the increasingly biased and even corrupt corporate media and joining us daily, there are powerful forces lined up to stop us: the old guard of the news media hopes to marginalize us; the big corporate ad agencies want to deprive us of revenue and put us out of business; senators threaten to have our reporters arrested for asking simple questions; the big tech platforms want to limit our ability to communicate with you; and the political party establishments feel threatened by our independence.

We don't complain -- we can't stand complainers -- but we do call it how we see it. We have a fight on our hands, and it's intense. We need your help to smash through the big tech, big media and big government blockade.

We're the insurgent outsiders for a reason: our deep-dive investigations hold the powerful to account. Our original videos undermine their narratives on a daily basis. Even our insistence on having fun infuriates them -- because we won’t bend the knee to political correctness.

One reason we stand apart is because we are not afraid to say we love America. We love her with every fiber of our being, and we think she's worth saving from today’s craziness.

Help us save her.

A second reason we stand out is the sheer number of honest responsible reporters we have helped train. We have trained so many solid reporters that they now hold prominent positions at publications across the political spectrum. Hear a rare reasonable voice at a place like CNN? There’s a good chance they were trained at Daily Caller. Same goes for the numerous Daily Caller alumni dominating the news coverage at outlets such as Fox News, Newsmax, Daily Wire and many others.

Simply put, America needs solid reporters fighting to tell the truth or we will never have honest elections or a fair system. We are working tirelessly to make that happen and we are making a difference.

Since 2010, The Daily Caller has grown immensely. We're in the halls of Congress. We're in the Oval Office. And we're in up to 20 million homes every single month. That's 20 million Americans like you who are impossible to ignore.

We can overcome the forces lined up against all of us. This is an important mission but we can’t do it unless you — the everyday Americans forgotten by the establishment — have our back.

Please consider becoming a Daily Caller Patriot today, and help us keep doing work that holds politicians, corporations and other leaders accountable. Help us thumb our noses at political correctness. Help us train a new generation of news reporters who will actually tell the truth. And help us remind Americans everywhere that there are millions of us who remain clear-eyed about our country's greatness.

In return for membership, Daily Caller Patriots will be able to read The Daily Caller without any of the ads that we have long used to support our mission. We know the ads drive you crazy. They drive us crazy too. But we need revenue to keep the fight going. If you join us, we will cut out the ads for you and put every Lincoln-headed cent we earn into amplifying our voice, training even more solid reporters, and giving you the ad-free experience and lightning fast website you deserve.

Patriots will also be eligible for Patriots Only content, newsletters, chats and live events with our reporters and editors. It's simple: welcome us into your lives, and we'll welcome you into ours.

We can save America together.

Become a Daily Caller Patriot today.

Signature

Neil Patel