Feature:Opinion

Presidents and our ‘Common’ culture

Tevi Troy Senior Fellow, Hudson Institute
Font Size:

President Obama’s recent troubles with the visit of the controversial rapper Common to the White House may demonstrate bad judgment on the part of the White House, but Obama is hardly the first president to have to navigate the difficult waters of dealing with notorious and mercurial entertainers.

President Eisenhower, for example, forbid White House projectionist Paul Fisher from showing films with the actor Robert Mitchum because of Mitchum’s conviction for marijuana possession. Eisenhower took this ban quite seriously. When Fisher tried to sneak a Mitchum film by Ike, the president stood up and walked out.

Pop culture was in its infancy during the Eisenhower administration, and it soon became clear that Eisenhower was trying to live up to an impossible standard. If presidents refused to deal with cultural figures who had histories of drug use, few entertainers would ever enter the White House. But over time, standards evolved to where White Houses would try to avoid individuals whose behavior or comments were outrageous, or where they had been critical of the sitting president. Even this revised standard, however, is hard to maintain, especially when dealing with artists, who like to shock and are representatives of what Lionel Trilling called the “adversary culture.”

Lyndon Johnson ran into this problem when he tried to hold a White House Festival of the Arts in 1965. This event, organized by former Princeton professor Eric Goldman, was intended to boost Johnson’s reputation among the intelligentsia, but ended up being a disaster. At the time, protests against Johnson’s Vietnam policies were heating up in the arts world, and poet Robert Lowell noisily pulled out of the conference, which angered Johnson and his aides. New Yorker writer Dwight MacDonald did attend, but used the opportunity to circulate a petition supporting Lowell. Charlton Heston, when asked to sign, upbraided MacDonald, telling him that “having convictions doesn’t mean that you have to lack elementary manners. Are you really accustomed to signing petitions against your host in his home?”

Despite Heston’s efforts, the festival was a public relations failure for Johnson, especially after MacDonald wrote a devastating piece calling out Goldman as some kind of cultural traitor for serving in the Johnson White House: “Poor Dr. Goldman, caught like Polonius (‘wretched, rash, intruding fool’) between the fell and incensed points of mighty antagonists.” Lady Bird Johnson, who had signed off on the concept of the festival as “an excellent idea,” later referred to the day of the festival in her diary as “Black Tuesday.” Perhaps it is unsurprising that in 2003 the George W. Bush White House cancelled a poetry festival that Mrs. Bush had tried to organize for fear of an anti-war protest developing.

Despite increased divergences between the norms of the pop-culture world and the more conventional tastes of what Richard Nixon called the “silent majority” of Americans, no president can afford to ignore popular culture. It is one of the few unifying forces in a country as large and diverse as ours. Even someone as culturally unhip as Nixon saw fit to meet with the musical icon Elvis Presley in 1970. Presley wanted Nixon to dub him “Federal Agent-at-Large” in the Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs. According to Nixon aide Egil “Bud” Krogh, Presley told Nixon that “he thought the Beatles had been a real force for anti-American spirit.” Nixon’s cultural commentary included the observation that “those who use drugs are also those in the vanguard of anti-American protest.” Nixon also agreed to give Elvis a badge, which he received while at lunch in the White House Mess with Krogh.

Ironically, given Presley’s request, many observers feel that Elvis appears stoned in the picture of the two standing together. The picture became the most frequently requested document from the National Archives. At other times, the White House screening mechanism was more rigorous regarding drug users. Former Jefferson Airplane star Grace Slick recently told The Wall Street Journal of the time she was invited to the White House for a reunion of attendees of Finch College, the alma mater of both Slick and Nixon’s daughter Patricia. Slick was invited as an alumnus under her given name of Grace Wing, and decided to bring Abbie Hoffman as her date. The two planned to slip acid into the president’s tea, but an alert Secret Service guard barred them from entering, telling the pair that “We checked and you’re a security risk.”

In more recent years, the White House screening and vetting processes have become so rigorous that it is hard to get someone with a questionable background past the Secret Service, and aides use comprehensive database services to avoid honoring or inviting individuals who could create controversy. Still, as we have seen, sometimes those in the White House orbit will refer to pop-culture controversies in order to make a point. In May of 1992, Dan Quayle criticized the fictional character Murphy Brown for having a child out of wedlock, and calling it just another “life-style choice.” Not long after, his boss George H.W. Bush also had a foray into cultural criticism, denouncing Ice T’s “Cop Killer” — although not directly — by calling it “sick” and declaring it “wrong for any company to issue records that approve of killing law enforcement officers.”

Of the two, Quayle’s comments made a bigger splash. The vice president was pilloried at the time for being judgmental and for going after a fictional character, but he was later vindicated by Barbara Dafoe Whitehead’s Atlantic cover declaring that “Dan Quayle Was Right.” Quayle may have been right, but by the time of the Atlantic story, he was a private citizen, as he and Bush lost the 1992 election to Bill Clinton. Around the same time, in June of 1992, Clinton went out of his way to criticize Sister Souljah’s comment that “If black people kill black people every day, why not have a week and kill white people?” Clinton took a hit from Jesse Jackson for his comments, but the now-famous “Sister Souljah moment” indicated a degree of cultural moderation on Clinton’s part that helped him secure the White House that fall.

George W. Bush for the most part avoided commenting on pop-culture issues, recognizing how unpopular he was among the entertainment elites. There was no shortage of stars denouncing Bush during his presidency — including, among many others, the Dixie Chicks (who were “ashamed” Bush was president), Martin Sheen (who called Bush a moron), and Jessica Lange (who said, “I hate Bush”). Bush wisely avoided exchanging fire with these critics. Even the attack that he later called “the worst moment of my presidency” — Kanye West’s saying “George Bush doesn’t care about black people” — went unanswered by the president until well after Bush had left the White House.

Bush, as a Republican, was quite distant from our pop culture and more easily able to avoid these kinds of controversies entering the White House. He could not control what people in the entertainment world said about him, but his staff could and did keep hostile entertainers away from the president and the White House. Obama, in contrast, is much closer to the entertainment world and more of a product of our popular culture. While Bush once told David Axelrod “I don’t watch television,” Obama’s memoir indicates how important TV was in his grandparents’ Hawaii household. Obama also has a subversive streak, declaring at one point that the gay homicidal renegade Omar on “The Wire” was his favorite character on the show. (He did, however, clarify, that it was not an endorsement of the character.) But Obama’s closeness to the pop-culture world is what makes him more vulnerable to a Common-type controversy. Celebrating entertainers makes it more likely that one’s aides and screeners will overlook their flaws in order to bask in their celebrity glow. While it is unrealistic that any president can or should return to an Eisenhower-type standard for dealing with entertainers, Obama needs to heed the lessons of his predecessors and be aware that pop-culture proclivities can mean trouble for a president, trouble that is usually best avoided.

Tevi Troy is a Senior Fellow at the Hudson Institute and a former senior White House aide. He is the author of Intellectuals and the American Presidency.

PREMIUM ARTICLE: Subscribe To Keep Reading

Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!

Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!

Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!

Sign Up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
BENEFITS READERS PASS PATRIOTS FOUNDERS
Daily and Breaking Newsletters
Daily Caller Shows
Ad Free Experience
Exclusive Articles
Custom Newsletters
Editor Daily Rundown
Behind The Scenes Coverage
Award Winning Documentaries
Patriot War Room
Patriot Live Chat
Exclusive Events
Gold Membership Card
Tucker Mug

What does Founders Club include?

Tucker Mug and Membership Card
Founders

Readers,

Instead of sucking up to the political and corporate powers that dominate America, The Daily Caller is fighting for you — our readers. We humbly ask you to consider joining us in this fight.

Now that millions of readers are rejecting the increasingly biased and even corrupt corporate media and joining us daily, there are powerful forces lined up to stop us: the old guard of the news media hopes to marginalize us; the big corporate ad agencies want to deprive us of revenue and put us out of business; senators threaten to have our reporters arrested for asking simple questions; the big tech platforms want to limit our ability to communicate with you; and the political party establishments feel threatened by our independence.

We don't complain -- we can't stand complainers -- but we do call it how we see it. We have a fight on our hands, and it's intense. We need your help to smash through the big tech, big media and big government blockade.

We're the insurgent outsiders for a reason: our deep-dive investigations hold the powerful to account. Our original videos undermine their narratives on a daily basis. Even our insistence on having fun infuriates them -- because we won’t bend the knee to political correctness.

One reason we stand apart is because we are not afraid to say we love America. We love her with every fiber of our being, and we think she's worth saving from today’s craziness.

Help us save her.

A second reason we stand out is the sheer number of honest responsible reporters we have helped train. We have trained so many solid reporters that they now hold prominent positions at publications across the political spectrum. Hear a rare reasonable voice at a place like CNN? There’s a good chance they were trained at Daily Caller. Same goes for the numerous Daily Caller alumni dominating the news coverage at outlets such as Fox News, Newsmax, Daily Wire and many others.

Simply put, America needs solid reporters fighting to tell the truth or we will never have honest elections or a fair system. We are working tirelessly to make that happen and we are making a difference.

Since 2010, The Daily Caller has grown immensely. We're in the halls of Congress. We're in the Oval Office. And we're in up to 20 million homes every single month. That's 20 million Americans like you who are impossible to ignore.

We can overcome the forces lined up against all of us. This is an important mission but we can’t do it unless you — the everyday Americans forgotten by the establishment — have our back.

Please consider becoming a Daily Caller Patriot today, and help us keep doing work that holds politicians, corporations and other leaders accountable. Help us thumb our noses at political correctness. Help us train a new generation of news reporters who will actually tell the truth. And help us remind Americans everywhere that there are millions of us who remain clear-eyed about our country's greatness.

In return for membership, Daily Caller Patriots will be able to read The Daily Caller without any of the ads that we have long used to support our mission. We know the ads drive you crazy. They drive us crazy too. But we need revenue to keep the fight going. If you join us, we will cut out the ads for you and put every Lincoln-headed cent we earn into amplifying our voice, training even more solid reporters, and giving you the ad-free experience and lightning fast website you deserve.

Patriots will also be eligible for Patriots Only content, newsletters, chats and live events with our reporters and editors. It's simple: welcome us into your lives, and we'll welcome you into ours.

We can save America together.

Become a Daily Caller Patriot today.

Signature

Neil Patel