You might think conservative Christian family-values types are the only ones who say stupid things about video games. Nnnnnnnnope.

From the International Red Cross, here’s part of a recent FAQ titled “Is there a place for the laws of armed conflict in video games?”

Why is the ICRC interested in video games that simulate real warfare?

The ICRC is interested in issues relating to video games of this type, i.e. games simulating warfare where players face choices just like on a real battlefield.

In real life, armed forces are subject to the laws of armed conflict. Video games simulating the experience of armed forces therefore have the potential to raise awareness of the rules that those forces must comply with whenever they engage in armed conflict – this is one of the things that interests the ICRC. As a matter of fact, certain video games already take into account how real-life military personnel are trained to behave in conflict situations.

Part of the ICRC’s mandate, conferred on it by States, is to promote respect for international humanitarian law – also known as the law of armed conflict – and universal humanitarian principles. Given this mandate and the ICRC’s long history and expertise in matters relating to armed conflict, the development of these games is clearly of interest to the organization.

Next up, the ACLU will decry the inhumane living conditions and random brutality in Arkham City.

Those prisoners are human beings and they have rights. Why is this fascist allowed to roam free, beating and maiming them at will? Just because he wears a uniform?

(Hat tip: Hot Air Greenroom)