Opinion

Civil Rights Are Too Important To Leave To Special-Interest Advocates

Jonathan Bean Research Fellow, Independent Institute
Font Size:

“War is too important to be left to the generals,” the saying goes. Similarly, civil rights are too important to be left to professional advocates who champion only their own particular racial, ethnic, or religious causes. Unfortunately, in the “official” civil rights community of today a spirit of inclusiveness may be the exception, not the rule.

The exclusive, in-group nature of this community is manifest in civil rights investigations. For example, community organizers and activist law professors are the prime movers for the “fact finding” of state advisory panels to the U.S. Civil Rights Commission, and their dominance crowds out other perspectives on civil rights issues. Nowhere is this more evident than in Chicago — the place where Barack Obama cut his teeth as a community organizer and law professor.

First, some context. Established in 1957, the U.S. Civil Rights Commission created State Advisory Committees. These committees report on issues ranging from “hate crimes” to immigration reform. One would expect the committees to seek out opposing viewpoints and to feature lively disagreements among members and witnesses who appear before their hearings. The final reports ought to reflect the range of views Americans hold on these issues, but raised to a higher level of research, fact finding, and deliberation.

Sadly, this has not been my experience.

Since my appointment in 2012 to the State Advisory Committee in Illinois, where I am one of 18 federally selected members, I have discovered that the focus of committee hearings — the basis of our reports — is nearly always on Chicago, as if civil rights stopped at the boundaries of a state’s largest city. In addition, witnesses consist almost exclusively of civil rights “careerists” — for example, community organizers of undocumented workers and allied law professors who hold clinics for the same constituents.

Furthermore, nearly all Committee members are likeminded to a degree that should alarm anyone who values diversity of opinion. Indeed, when I filed my first dissent two years ago — criticizing a report for failing to cite union opposition to Walmart as a reason for “food deserts” in poor areas of Chicago — the chair could not recall anyone ever filing a dissent and didn’t know how to proceed. Fortunately, after the dust cleared, my dissent was filed along with the final report sent to the national Commission.

Imagine the controversial issues a civil rights committee must deal with — and yet decades go by without any dissent! Such unanimity reveals a deep isolation from the lively policy debates occurring in the rest of America.

My committee’s latest report on immigration reform, published in December, illustrates the problem of listening to only one corner of America’s living room. As the sole dissenter, I noted how little our witnesses appreciated the legitimate concerns that shaped the bipartisan immigration reform bill the U.S. Senate passed in 2013. The report reflected the lopsided composition of our witness list.

First, the report criticized what it did not explain. Senate Bill 744 would have eliminated some family-based immigration visas and authorized more merit-based visas, a provision that reflects a longstanding criticism of U.S. immigration law: that it overemphasizes family and underemphasizes meritorious applications critical to American economic competitiveness. In 2012, both Barack Obama and Mitt Romney voiced this concern, but the Illinois Committee didn’t even consider it.

Second, the report stretched itself to find fault with hypothetical “disparate impacts” on LGBQT, women, and others. At one point, the report faulted the Senate’s merit-based visa provision because women have limited educational opportunities in the developing world. The report thus burdened any immigration reform with the impossible task of overcoming the world’s civil rights problems. Given such impossible standards, the logic of disparate impact would nix any immigration reform.

On Martin Luther King Day, it is worth noting that King understood the value of hearing opposing viewpoints. He contrasted his views not only with the virulence of the hardcore racists of his day, but also with the views of thoughtful civil rights advocates who disagreed with his confrontational street tactics. His vision was a major step forward that yielded a greater understanding of the potential benefits — and moral necessity — of a more inclusive society. In short, we became a better country for embracing differences of opinion.

King’s dream of a more just society is poorly served by ignoring viewpoints that disagree with our own. “A mind is a terrible thing to waste” — and now is the time to let differing minds engage on the contentious issues of our day.

Jonathan Bean is a research fellow at The Independent Institute and Professor of History, Southern Illinois University. He is the editor of Race and Liberty in America: The Essential Reader(University Press of Kentucky, with The Independent Institute, 2009).

PREMIUM ARTICLE: Subscribe To Keep Reading

Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!

Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!

Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!

Sign Up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
BENEFITS READERS PASS PATRIOTS FOUNDERS
Daily and Breaking Newsletters
Daily Caller Shows
Ad Free Experience
Exclusive Articles
Custom Newsletters
Editor Daily Rundown
Behind The Scenes Coverage
Award Winning Documentaries
Patriot War Room
Patriot Live Chat
Exclusive Events
Gold Membership Card
Tucker Mug

What does Founders Club include?

Tucker Mug and Membership Card
Founders

Readers,

Instead of sucking up to the political and corporate powers that dominate America, The Daily Caller is fighting for you — our readers. We humbly ask you to consider joining us in this fight.

Now that millions of readers are rejecting the increasingly biased and even corrupt corporate media and joining us daily, there are powerful forces lined up to stop us: the old guard of the news media hopes to marginalize us; the big corporate ad agencies want to deprive us of revenue and put us out of business; senators threaten to have our reporters arrested for asking simple questions; the big tech platforms want to limit our ability to communicate with you; and the political party establishments feel threatened by our independence.

We don't complain -- we can't stand complainers -- but we do call it how we see it. We have a fight on our hands, and it's intense. We need your help to smash through the big tech, big media and big government blockade.

We're the insurgent outsiders for a reason: our deep-dive investigations hold the powerful to account. Our original videos undermine their narratives on a daily basis. Even our insistence on having fun infuriates them -- because we won’t bend the knee to political correctness.

One reason we stand apart is because we are not afraid to say we love America. We love her with every fiber of our being, and we think she's worth saving from today’s craziness.

Help us save her.

A second reason we stand out is the sheer number of honest responsible reporters we have helped train. We have trained so many solid reporters that they now hold prominent positions at publications across the political spectrum. Hear a rare reasonable voice at a place like CNN? There’s a good chance they were trained at Daily Caller. Same goes for the numerous Daily Caller alumni dominating the news coverage at outlets such as Fox News, Newsmax, Daily Wire and many others.

Simply put, America needs solid reporters fighting to tell the truth or we will never have honest elections or a fair system. We are working tirelessly to make that happen and we are making a difference.

Since 2010, The Daily Caller has grown immensely. We're in the halls of Congress. We're in the Oval Office. And we're in up to 20 million homes every single month. That's 20 million Americans like you who are impossible to ignore.

We can overcome the forces lined up against all of us. This is an important mission but we can’t do it unless you — the everyday Americans forgotten by the establishment — have our back.

Please consider becoming a Daily Caller Patriot today, and help us keep doing work that holds politicians, corporations and other leaders accountable. Help us thumb our noses at political correctness. Help us train a new generation of news reporters who will actually tell the truth. And help us remind Americans everywhere that there are millions of us who remain clear-eyed about our country's greatness.

In return for membership, Daily Caller Patriots will be able to read The Daily Caller without any of the ads that we have long used to support our mission. We know the ads drive you crazy. They drive us crazy too. But we need revenue to keep the fight going. If you join us, we will cut out the ads for you and put every Lincoln-headed cent we earn into amplifying our voice, training even more solid reporters, and giving you the ad-free experience and lightning fast website you deserve.

Patriots will also be eligible for Patriots Only content, newsletters, chats and live events with our reporters and editors. It's simple: welcome us into your lives, and we'll welcome you into ours.

We can save America together.

Become a Daily Caller Patriot today.

Signature

Neil Patel