Opinion

3 Foreign Policy Questions For The GOP Contenders

Jamie Weinstein Senior Writer
Font Size:

Foreign policy may help determine the next president — but how do we figure out the foreign policy differences between the different Republican contenders?

To many, most of the potential and declared GOP contenders seem very similar on foreign policy, with nearly all promising a more engaged America that will more meaningfully stand up to the world’s bad guys, from the Islamic State to the Islamic Republic. But what does that exactly mean in practice and exactly how do the GOP contenders differ from each another?

Despite what many in the media predicted in 2013, the Republican foreign policy debate is not between Rand Paul-style non-interventionists and John McCain-style hawks, largely because there are very few Republican non-interventionists in elected office. And even Paul seems to be trying to transform himself into much more of a hawk these days, at least in rhetoric. (RELATED: Forget Syria, The GOP Is Not Becoming A Non-Interventionist Party)

Instead, the Republican foreign policy debate is between various degrees of hawkishness. Most of the GOP contenders believe the U.S. should act tougher with Iran (with perhaps the exception of Paul) and most believe the U.S. should more robustly stand up for freedom and liberal democracy abroad.

But how far will a candidate be willing to go to support a democracy movement in a foreign land? Will they be willing to throw a pro-American dictator under the bus in support of a “democracy” revolution? Would they intervene militarily to stop the bloodshed of a civil war where there is little obvious strategic American interest?

Here are three questions that, if answered by the candidates, could begin to help delineate the foreign policy differences of the 2016 GOP primary field:

1.) What would you have done in during the 2011 Egyptian revolution? Was it right for the United States to help push longtime Egyptian strongman Hosni Mubarak aside? Or should the U.S. have stood behind America’s longtime, if often unsavory, ally? 

2.) It’s March 2011. Forces loyal to Muammar Gaddafi are moving on Benghazi, where the revolution against the longtime Libyan dictator began. Some are warning that a massacre of tens, if not hundreds, of thousands will take place if the international community, led by the United States, does not act militarily to prevent it. President Obama, prodded by Hillary Clinton, reluctantly authorized the use of military force, which ultimately aided in Gaddafi’s overthrow. Gaddafi was of course a sadistic and brutal dictator, but at the time of his overthrow, he posed little threat to the United States and was in fact helping the U.S. in its fight against al-Qaida. Since his fall, Libya has become a failed state, where Islamist terrorists are able to freely roam. But let’s go back to March 2011 when many in the international community were calling on the American president to act to save Benghazi. How would you have responded as president — or not have responded?

3.) How should America have responded in the Syrian civil war? Should the U.S. be backing the rebels in Syria more robustly against the Iranian-backed dictatorship of Bashar al-Assad? If it’s too late to do so now because you believe the rebels have been overtaken by Islamists, is there a point where you would have supported getting fully behind the rebels? And if you believe the U.S. should not support either side, is there any role the U.S. should be playing in the conflict? 

These are not simple questions and will likely elicit a range of answers from the GOP contenders. On Egypt, a candidate might say that there was no choice but to support the Egyptian revolution because there was no way the U.S. could have saved Mubarak — and besides, America should stand on the side of democracy, not dictators. Or, a candidate might argue the U.S. needed to stand by Mubarak because Egypt was not ready for liberal democracy, was helpful to American interests and, what’s more, by abandoning a longtime ally, it sent a message to other allies in the region that the U.S. could at any moment abandon them too.

On Libya, some candidates will probably say that there was no compelling American interest in aiding in Gaddafi’s overthrow, even if he was a despicable leader. Others will argue that whether he was still a threat to America or not, Gaddafi had American blood on his hands and that the U.S. correctly stood on the right side of history by aiding with his overthrow, even if they would have acted differently than the Obama administration to prevent the chaos that came afterward.

Of course, these are not the only answers to the questions and these are obviously not the only questions that could help distinguish various Republican candidates from each other. But they’re not a bad place to start to find some differentiation.

Follow Jamie on Twitter

PREMIUM ARTICLE: Subscribe To Keep Reading

Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!

Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!

Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!

Sign Up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
BENEFITS READERS PASS PATRIOTS FOUNDERS
Daily and Breaking Newsletters
Daily Caller Shows
Ad Free Experience
Exclusive Articles
Custom Newsletters
Editor Daily Rundown
Behind The Scenes Coverage
Award Winning Documentaries
Patriot War Room
Patriot Live Chat
Exclusive Events
Gold Membership Card
Tucker Mug

What does Founders Club include?

Tucker Mug and Membership Card
Founders

Readers,

Instead of sucking up to the political and corporate powers that dominate America, The Daily Caller is fighting for you — our readers. We humbly ask you to consider joining us in this fight.

Now that millions of readers are rejecting the increasingly biased and even corrupt corporate media and joining us daily, there are powerful forces lined up to stop us: the old guard of the news media hopes to marginalize us; the big corporate ad agencies want to deprive us of revenue and put us out of business; senators threaten to have our reporters arrested for asking simple questions; the big tech platforms want to limit our ability to communicate with you; and the political party establishments feel threatened by our independence.

We don't complain -- we can't stand complainers -- but we do call it how we see it. We have a fight on our hands, and it's intense. We need your help to smash through the big tech, big media and big government blockade.

We're the insurgent outsiders for a reason: our deep-dive investigations hold the powerful to account. Our original videos undermine their narratives on a daily basis. Even our insistence on having fun infuriates them -- because we won’t bend the knee to political correctness.

One reason we stand apart is because we are not afraid to say we love America. We love her with every fiber of our being, and we think she's worth saving from today’s craziness.

Help us save her.

A second reason we stand out is the sheer number of honest responsible reporters we have helped train. We have trained so many solid reporters that they now hold prominent positions at publications across the political spectrum. Hear a rare reasonable voice at a place like CNN? There’s a good chance they were trained at Daily Caller. Same goes for the numerous Daily Caller alumni dominating the news coverage at outlets such as Fox News, Newsmax, Daily Wire and many others.

Simply put, America needs solid reporters fighting to tell the truth or we will never have honest elections or a fair system. We are working tirelessly to make that happen and we are making a difference.

Since 2010, The Daily Caller has grown immensely. We're in the halls of Congress. We're in the Oval Office. And we're in up to 20 million homes every single month. That's 20 million Americans like you who are impossible to ignore.

We can overcome the forces lined up against all of us. This is an important mission but we can’t do it unless you — the everyday Americans forgotten by the establishment — have our back.

Please consider becoming a Daily Caller Patriot today, and help us keep doing work that holds politicians, corporations and other leaders accountable. Help us thumb our noses at political correctness. Help us train a new generation of news reporters who will actually tell the truth. And help us remind Americans everywhere that there are millions of us who remain clear-eyed about our country's greatness.

In return for membership, Daily Caller Patriots will be able to read The Daily Caller without any of the ads that we have long used to support our mission. We know the ads drive you crazy. They drive us crazy too. But we need revenue to keep the fight going. If you join us, we will cut out the ads for you and put every Lincoln-headed cent we earn into amplifying our voice, training even more solid reporters, and giving you the ad-free experience and lightning fast website you deserve.

Patriots will also be eligible for Patriots Only content, newsletters, chats and live events with our reporters and editors. It's simple: welcome us into your lives, and we'll welcome you into ours.

We can save America together.

Become a Daily Caller Patriot today.

Signature

Neil Patel