Opinion

Is Donald Trump ‘Qualified’ To Be Commander-in-Chief? Ronald Reagan Was.

Stewart Lawrence Stewart J. Lawrence is a Washington, D.C.-based public policy analyst who writes frequently on immigration and Latino affairs. He is also founder and managing director of Puentes & Associates, Inc., a bilingual survey research and communications firm.
Font Size:

Leave it to the mainstream media to predict the end of Donald Trump’s candidacy just when he’s surging in the polls again. The latest member of the “Trump’s-a-Goner” club is Politico, the upstart news magazine that seems intent on morphing into another stodgy fixture of the Washington political and media establishment. In a recent issue, the magazine published a lengthy article suggesting that the ISIS Paris attacks and the rising concern over global insecurity would place a premium on Republican presidential candidates that had a “command” of foreign policy issues rather than “neophytes” like Trump and co-front-runner Ben Carson who are presumably “out of their element.”   

These are familiar views. We heard them when Ronald Reagan’s insurgent campaign was steaming toward the nomination in 1979, much to the consternation of the GOP party establishment which feared that he was “too extreme” for the general electorate. It’s probably no surprise, then, that all of the quotes from unnamed sources in the Politico article are attributed to “Republican party elders.” These are the same people who have erroneously predicted Trump’s demise from the beginning – and they are increasingly desperate to derail the real estate magnate from getting the nomination, just as their forbears were so anxious to stop Reagan.

We remember – and laud — Reagan today as the hero of the American Cold War but like Trump, he was no foreign policy expert, and he was prone to blunt, off-the-cuff remarks that, as with Trump, raised serious eyebrows. His conservative instincts told him that the Soviet Union was a threat to world peace, and that America needed a far more robust military to force the Soviets into retreat — which is exactly what happened after he took office.

In fact, most of what the former California governor knew in detail about foreign and defense policy he learned from the neoconservative movement – which was largely comprised of ex-Democrats disgruntled with the establishment in both parties, including most Republicans. Reagan had a brain trust, which Trump still lacks, but it’s entirely conceivable that he will hire one, especially as his candidacy continues to consolidate, which seems increasingly likely now.

How many other current GOP candidates are conversant in the details of foreign and defense policy? Only Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz but their “depth” comes largely from serving less than a single term in the U.S. Senate. Five years ago, Rubio was Speaker of the Florida Senate, and his only claim to foreign policy experience was living 90 miles away from Castro’s Cuba. Once Rubio got to the Senate, a number of senior Republicans took him under their wing to try to promote his visibility. Rubio joined the Foreign Relations Committee and began touring the world to meet influential leaders and to inspect important hotspots.

Cruz is even more of neophyte. He’s been in the Senate a scant three years, and has insinuated himself into many important policy debates. However, prior to his election in 2012, he was Texas’ Solicitor General, undoubtedly an important job, but not one that exposed him to foreign and defense policy. It did expose him to the GOP establishment, however, and like Rubio, he has used some his time in the Senate to school himself of national security questions. Does it make him qualified to be Commander-in-Chief? It’s hard to know. Like Trump, he’s never actually made any executive-level national security decisions.

The rest of the field may well be worse off. Neither Jeb Bush nor Chris Christie has previous foreign and defense policy experience. That leaves only two-term Ohio governor John Kasich, who once chaired the House armed services committee where he pushed a host of military funding bills through the Congress. However, he did this two decades ago in a vastly different global environment. And right now, because of his views on immigration and social issues, he’s about as popular in the GOP as Jon Huntsman was in 2012.

What makes someone “qualified” to be Commander-in-Chief? John McCain and John Kerry were two of the nation’s most experienced foreign policy presidential candidates – both were decorated war veterans, in fact — and yet both lost, in part, because of basic questions about their judgment. Throughout our history, successful Commanders-in-Chief have displayed strong instincts about the nature of the threats facing our country and have exhibited an uncanny intuitive ability to make difficult and courageous decisions under fire. Trump may or may not have these qualities. Clearly, a strong part of the GOP electorate thinks he does. And as long as they do, it probably won’t matter what GOP “elders” – with their own checkered record of national security stewardship – seem to think about it.

PREMIUM ARTICLE: Subscribe To Keep Reading

Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!

Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!

Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!

Sign Up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
BENEFITS READERS PASS PATRIOTS FOUNDERS
Daily and Breaking Newsletters
Daily Caller Shows
Ad Free Experience
Exclusive Articles
Custom Newsletters
Editor Daily Rundown
Behind The Scenes Coverage
Award Winning Documentaries
Patriot War Room
Patriot Live Chat
Exclusive Events
Gold Membership Card
Tucker Mug

What does Founders Club include?

Tucker Mug and Membership Card
Founders

Readers,

Instead of sucking up to the political and corporate powers that dominate America, The Daily Caller is fighting for you — our readers. We humbly ask you to consider joining us in this fight.

Now that millions of readers are rejecting the increasingly biased and even corrupt corporate media and joining us daily, there are powerful forces lined up to stop us: the old guard of the news media hopes to marginalize us; the big corporate ad agencies want to deprive us of revenue and put us out of business; senators threaten to have our reporters arrested for asking simple questions; the big tech platforms want to limit our ability to communicate with you; and the political party establishments feel threatened by our independence.

We don't complain -- we can't stand complainers -- but we do call it how we see it. We have a fight on our hands, and it's intense. We need your help to smash through the big tech, big media and big government blockade.

We're the insurgent outsiders for a reason: our deep-dive investigations hold the powerful to account. Our original videos undermine their narratives on a daily basis. Even our insistence on having fun infuriates them -- because we won’t bend the knee to political correctness.

One reason we stand apart is because we are not afraid to say we love America. We love her with every fiber of our being, and we think she's worth saving from today’s craziness.

Help us save her.

A second reason we stand out is the sheer number of honest responsible reporters we have helped train. We have trained so many solid reporters that they now hold prominent positions at publications across the political spectrum. Hear a rare reasonable voice at a place like CNN? There’s a good chance they were trained at Daily Caller. Same goes for the numerous Daily Caller alumni dominating the news coverage at outlets such as Fox News, Newsmax, Daily Wire and many others.

Simply put, America needs solid reporters fighting to tell the truth or we will never have honest elections or a fair system. We are working tirelessly to make that happen and we are making a difference.

Since 2010, The Daily Caller has grown immensely. We're in the halls of Congress. We're in the Oval Office. And we're in up to 20 million homes every single month. That's 20 million Americans like you who are impossible to ignore.

We can overcome the forces lined up against all of us. This is an important mission but we can’t do it unless you — the everyday Americans forgotten by the establishment — have our back.

Please consider becoming a Daily Caller Patriot today, and help us keep doing work that holds politicians, corporations and other leaders accountable. Help us thumb our noses at political correctness. Help us train a new generation of news reporters who will actually tell the truth. And help us remind Americans everywhere that there are millions of us who remain clear-eyed about our country's greatness.

In return for membership, Daily Caller Patriots will be able to read The Daily Caller without any of the ads that we have long used to support our mission. We know the ads drive you crazy. They drive us crazy too. But we need revenue to keep the fight going. If you join us, we will cut out the ads for you and put every Lincoln-headed cent we earn into amplifying our voice, training even more solid reporters, and giving you the ad-free experience and lightning fast website you deserve.

Patriots will also be eligible for Patriots Only content, newsletters, chats and live events with our reporters and editors. It's simple: welcome us into your lives, and we'll welcome you into ours.

We can save America together.

Become a Daily Caller Patriot today.

Signature

Neil Patel