Clarence Thomas Is Conspicuously Absent In The New Black History Smithsonian

YouTube screen grab/University of Virginia

Daily Caller News Foundation logo
Kevin Daley Supreme Court correspondent
Font Size:

Justice Clarence Thomas, the second black man to serve on the U.S. Supreme Court, is practically absent from the new National Museum of African American History and Culture.

Anita Hill, the woman who accused Thomas of sexual harassment, however, is given prominent billing in the museum.

“I am not surprised that Justice Thomas’ inspiring life story is not a part of the new museum,” Mark Paoletta, an assistant White House Counsel in the George H. W. Bush administration who worked on the Thomas confirmation, told The Daily Caller News Foundation. “Civil rights leaders have tried for decades to malign Justice Thomas because he actually dares to have his own views on race issues.”

“One prominent liberal Supreme Court practitioner has called Justice Thomas ‘our greatest Justice,’ but you would never know that listening to the civil rights leadership,” he added.

The new Smithsonian, which opened in September, gives Hill pride of place in an exhibit on blacks in the 1990s. The exhibit features testimonies trumpeting her courage and the surge of women’s activism that ensued, while making only peripheral reference to the nation’s second black Supreme Court justice.

There is no showcase of Thomas’s own life and career, which ran its own harsh gauntlet of racial discrimination. The exclusion is especially odd given Thomas’ intimate experience with racial discrimination.

Thomas was born in Georgia’s coastal lowlands among impoverished Gullah-speakers. By his own account, he did not master the Queen’s English until his early 20s. He came of age in Jim Crow Savannah, where he was in turn ridiculed by white neighbors and classmates for his unpolished style, one of many indignities typical of his adolescence in the racist south. Despite those challenges, he matriculated at the College of the Holy Cross in Worcester, Mass. and went on to Yale Law School.

Prior to his appointment to the federal bench, Thomas served as chairman of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the federal agency tasked with policing discrimination in the private sector.

A Government Accountability Office (GAO) report issued two months into Thomas’s tenure criticized years of fiscal malfeasance. The report found the absence of internal accounting controls left bills unpaid and receivables uncollected, while federally-mandated records were largely unreliable. (RELATED: Supreme Court Will Hear Ban On Offensive Trademarks)

By all accounts, Thomas was a diligent administrator who reformed an inert agency for a new era. He oversaw the opening of a new headquarters, introduced new technologies like personal computers, and won one of the largest workplace discrimination settlements in the history of the agency, securing a $42.5 million award from an automaker in 1983.

His litigation methods, however, were deeply unpopular with the civil rights establishment. He abandoned class action lawsuits and findings of discrimination based on statistics. He saw both mechanisms as tools for bludgeoning the private sector into compliance with a clientelistic agenda, in which corporate entities would agree to timetables and quotas devised by white liberals for hiring minorities, while making sizable donations to black social organizations.

Thomas thought such practices would decay into a form of racial patronage over time. He instead favored bringing actions on behalf of individuals, which he saw as corresponding to the dignity of the person in the way class action suits do not.

“What happened to the people actually discriminated against?” Paoletta told TheDCNF, in reference to Thomas’s view. “Where was their remedy?”

The was a presence in the Reagan White House on other matters of controversy. He criticized the administration’s decision to support tax-exempt status for Bob Jones University, a segregationist institution, and openly admonished the U.S. Department of Justice for setting a “negative agenda.”

Another black pioneer of the judiciary has been excluded from the museum. Judge Janice Rogers Brown, the first black woman to serve on the California Supreme Court and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit (generally regarded as the second-highest court in the land) is also not featured. Brown is a George W. Bush-appointee to the federal bench and is a committed libertarian jurist.

The National Museum of African American History and Culture did not respond to multiple inquiries by press time.

Editor’s note: Clarence Thomas’ wife Ginni is an employee of The Daily Caller News Foundation.

Follow Kevin on Twitter

Send tips to

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact