TheDC Legal Overview: The Supreme Court reviews free speech rights in light of the anti-gay military protests of the Westboro Baptist Church

The Daily Caller dailycaller.com
Font Size:

A skeptical, curious, and cautious Supreme Court took up a weighty free speech case Wednesday as they heard oral arguments in Snyder v. Phelps. The issue being debated was whether the First Amendment protects protesters at a funeral from liability for intentionally inflicting emotional harm on the deceased’s grieving family.

Albert Snyder, the father of a dead Marine, is asking the Supreme Court to uphold a nearly $11 million jury verdict (reduced to $5 million by the courts) for intentional infliction of emotional distress and invasion of privacy through protests surrounding his son’s funeral. Westboro Baptist Church, led by Pastor Fred Phelps, contended that their constitutionally protected protests and speech at the funeral were not directly targeted at Snyder’s son, nor was their speech outrageous enough to cause emotional harm. This small church in Kansas has a reputation for conducting similar protests around the country. The slogans on these signs included “God hates fags”; “Thank God for Dead Soldiers”; “Semper Fi fags”;  and “You’re going to hell.” Phelps also posted related internet content to the Church’s website directly naming and targeting Snyder’s son.

Protestors were plentiful on the Supreme Court steps beginning early Wednesday morning. Members of the Westboro Baptist Church could be seen holding many of the same war protest signs at issue in this case. The courtroom was at capacity, as this case has drawn attention from the public and scholars alike. The skeptical Justices struggled today with the notion of further restricting free speech on a public matter when targeted toward private individuals.

Newcomer to the Court, Justice Elena Kagen, had a lot to say during her third day of oral arguments. Her first question asked what qualifies as “outrageousness in the nature of political and social discourse.” In her questioning, Justice Kagen asked for a Federal Court case from Snyder’s counsel, Sean E. Summers, to illustrate why a simple law prohibiting such protest within a certain distance would not be sufficient. Although unable to cite a case, Summers fought back by stating that such a hypothetical law would not prevent all harm and that without damages available, there would be no real incentive to curb such harmful speech and disruptive behavior.

Justice Alito questioned Summers about the videos posted online by the Church which specifically named Snyder’s dead son. Alito asked how far the Church could go with these videos. This led Justice Breyer to give Summers a series of leading questions about whether we can put anything on television or the Internet. “Have I said enough to get you talking,” quipped Breyer to nervous laughter in the courtroom. Summers relied on the Hustler Magazine versus Jerry Falwell case to illustrate the boundary of outrageous speech.

The famous Hustler Magazine versus Jerry Falwell Supreme Court case laid out the groundwork for today’s arguments.  It held that there is free speech protection as to parody, made through outrageous (false) statements against a public figure.  This case was made famous by the movie, “The People vs. Larry Flynt.” Legally, the Court was struggling with whether this protection extended to private individuals who lacked the fame and notoriety of Jerry Falwell. Justice Scalia was particularly concerned with the differences between public and private figures, asking if counsel agreed that they should be treated differently under the law. Summers agreed but Scalia then asked, “how do we treat it differently?”

Fred Phelps was represented by his daughter, Margie Phelps, who presented a calculated and confident argument to the Justices. Phelps was questioned by Justices Samuel Alito and Sonia Sotomayor as to whether the Snyder family was a captive audience at the funeral. The Justices also inquired as to whether the Church’s behavior was confrontational. Phelps was bombarded with hypothetical questions from the Justices, going as far as to reference an elderly grandmother on a bus who could not fight back.  “She’s a Quaker too,” said Justice Alito, to a room full of laughter. Phelps defended her position that confrontational “fighting words” or stalking would not be protected by the First Amendment, indicating that the line is already established by past Supreme Court cases.

“Excellent” is how a confident Phelps described today’s arguments before the Court. She continued, “All the right questions. All the right answers. I think it’s clear how they are going to rule after this.” Westboro Baptist Church has the reluctant support of many free speech advocacy groups who support the First Amendment in this case but do not agree with the message of the Church.

“You don’t know from my seat” said a skeptical Summers afterwards. Summers continued, “I really liked the line of questioning about the grandmother.” Phelps also indicated that he agreed with the line of questioning about the internet content, stating, “it certainly shows that the speech was targeted,” but wished that more time was spent on that subject before being bombarded with multiple questions at once from different Justices. Snyder is supported by the attorneys general of 48 states and the District of Columbia, along with a bipartisan mix of nearly half of the Senate.

Justice Kagen’s final questions indicated that she was hesitant to allow “exploitation of a funeral for the purposes of gaining publicity only.” Kagen noted that the Westboro Baptist Church had a stage for their protests earlier in the day at the Capitol and in Annapolis, MD. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, perhaps the most hesitant that the Snyder family could actually sue in this case, did say that this case was all about “exploiting a private family’s grief.” While the Supreme Court now has a chance to change our First Amendment rights with this case, it is more likely that the forthcoming opinion will be more specific to Snyder’s case only, as not to upset well-protected free speech rights in too many other situations.

Rob Kimmer is a legal journalist, scholar, and practicing attorney.

PREMIUM ARTICLE: Subscribe To Keep Reading

Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!

Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!

Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!

Sign Up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
BENEFITS READERS PASS PATRIOTS FOUNDERS
Daily and Breaking Newsletters
Daily Caller Shows
Ad Free Experience
Exclusive Articles
Custom Newsletters
Editor Daily Rundown
Behind The Scenes Coverage
Award Winning Documentaries
Patriot War Room
Patriot Live Chat
Exclusive Events
Gold Membership Card
Tucker Mug

What does Founders Club include?

Tucker Mug and Membership Card
Founders

Readers,

Instead of sucking up to the political and corporate powers that dominate America, The Daily Caller is fighting for you — our readers. We humbly ask you to consider joining us in this fight.

Now that millions of readers are rejecting the increasingly biased and even corrupt corporate media and joining us daily, there are powerful forces lined up to stop us: the old guard of the news media hopes to marginalize us; the big corporate ad agencies want to deprive us of revenue and put us out of business; senators threaten to have our reporters arrested for asking simple questions; the big tech platforms want to limit our ability to communicate with you; and the political party establishments feel threatened by our independence.

We don't complain -- we can't stand complainers -- but we do call it how we see it. We have a fight on our hands, and it's intense. We need your help to smash through the big tech, big media and big government blockade.

We're the insurgent outsiders for a reason: our deep-dive investigations hold the powerful to account. Our original videos undermine their narratives on a daily basis. Even our insistence on having fun infuriates them -- because we won’t bend the knee to political correctness.

One reason we stand apart is because we are not afraid to say we love America. We love her with every fiber of our being, and we think she's worth saving from today’s craziness.

Help us save her.

A second reason we stand out is the sheer number of honest responsible reporters we have helped train. We have trained so many solid reporters that they now hold prominent positions at publications across the political spectrum. Hear a rare reasonable voice at a place like CNN? There’s a good chance they were trained at Daily Caller. Same goes for the numerous Daily Caller alumni dominating the news coverage at outlets such as Fox News, Newsmax, Daily Wire and many others.

Simply put, America needs solid reporters fighting to tell the truth or we will never have honest elections or a fair system. We are working tirelessly to make that happen and we are making a difference.

Since 2010, The Daily Caller has grown immensely. We're in the halls of Congress. We're in the Oval Office. And we're in up to 20 million homes every single month. That's 20 million Americans like you who are impossible to ignore.

We can overcome the forces lined up against all of us. This is an important mission but we can’t do it unless you — the everyday Americans forgotten by the establishment — have our back.

Please consider becoming a Daily Caller Patriot today, and help us keep doing work that holds politicians, corporations and other leaders accountable. Help us thumb our noses at political correctness. Help us train a new generation of news reporters who will actually tell the truth. And help us remind Americans everywhere that there are millions of us who remain clear-eyed about our country's greatness.

In return for membership, Daily Caller Patriots will be able to read The Daily Caller without any of the ads that we have long used to support our mission. We know the ads drive you crazy. They drive us crazy too. But we need revenue to keep the fight going. If you join us, we will cut out the ads for you and put every Lincoln-headed cent we earn into amplifying our voice, training even more solid reporters, and giving you the ad-free experience and lightning fast website you deserve.

Patriots will also be eligible for Patriots Only content, newsletters, chats and live events with our reporters and editors. It's simple: welcome us into your lives, and we'll welcome you into ours.

We can save America together.

Become a Daily Caller Patriot today.

Signature

Neil Patel