Politics

Ron Paul’s role in the 2012 election cycle remains uncertain

Amanda Carey Contributor
Font Size:

As the 2012 election cycle approaches, supporters and detractors alike are wondering how Ron Paul will capitalize on his 2008 Republican primary success, if at all. Kingmaker, candidate, or disinterested onlooker are all possibilities for the Texas congressman who told The Daily Caller he remains “definitely undecided” on another run.

Paul made a splash in the Republican presidential primaries in 2008 that went far beyond his impressive – and in some cases record breaking – fundraising numbers. Aided by his dedicated and ferociously protective supporters, known as Paulites, Paul started the election season with a surprisingly strong showing. In the Iowa caucuses, Paul picked up a very respectable 10 percent of the vote.

“A lot of people say Ron Paul failed. Well, that’s obviously not true,” said Jonathan Bydlak, Paul’s director of fundraising during the 2008 campaign who now works as former New Mexico Republican Gov. Gary Johnson’s finance director. “Given where the expectations were when he announced….you wouldn’t have expected Paul to get eight or 10 percent anywhere.”

One of the biggest “Ron Paul effects” still rippling through party politics three years later is what he did to the Libertarian Party.

While the line between honest-to-goodness Libertarians (Big “L”) and libertarian-leaning Republicans naturally became smaller because of Paul, in other ways, it was only sharpened, leaving some to nervously ponder what another presidential run could do to the third party.

“Ron Paul was the best and worst thing to happen to libertarians in 2008,” said Andrew Davis, who was communications director for the Libertarian Party before becoming press secretary for the party’s presidential nominee Bob Barr during in 2008. “His campaign started the recent constitutional movement and brought libertarian ideas into the mainstream, but he also shattered this coalition when he refused to pick a successor and his campaign came to a close.”

Davis’ cynicism is understandable from the Libertarian Party’s perspective. When Paul withdrew from the presidential race in June 2008 after it was clear his campaign had run its course, he refused to endorse Barr, who was, at least on paper, the closest candidate to Paul ideologically of any presidential candidate in any party. Instead, Paul simply told voters to either not vote, or vote for any of the third party candidates.

Rank and file Libertarians Party members who welcomed Paul’s success in the Republican Party felt betrayed. Paul was a mainstream candidate who fully embodied the majority of the Libertarian platform, but refused to bless the Libertarian Party’s nominee with an endorsement once he put his Republican campaign to rest.

But the Barr-Paul relationship, at least publicly, was not always an easy one. In the summer of 2008, for example, Paul held a press conference with all the third-party candidates as part of his effort to encourage third-party voting, an event Barr backed out of attending.

“I don’t know why, but my guess is it was because he thought he was more important than the other third party candidates,” said Bydlak. “Paul kind of took it as, well, he wasn’t offended, but he thought he was doing something good, and Barr just backed out and kind of slapped him in the face.”

For all of Paul’s 2008 successes – the fundraising, the grassroots involvement, and the new awareness of libertarian causes – he was an odd force of nature within the election cycle, who elicited passionate support from the Libertarian Party base. But by the time the general election rolled around, that same base mostly chose to stay home rather than vote for Barr, Paul’s closest ideological match.

In 2012, the question is now whether Paul’s relative 2008 success can be repeated or expanded, even if the establishment sentiment is reflected in Donald Trump’s now-famous admonition to Paul supporters, “Ron Paul cannot get elected, I’m sorry to tell you.”

Complicating matters this time, however, is the reality that Paul may not be the only libertarian-leaning Republican in the presidential field, should he choose to run. Former Governor of New Mexico Gary Johnson has been tip toeing around announcing his candidacy for president for months now. His supporters have already dubbed him the “next Ron Paul,” which begs the question: is the Republican field big enough for two libertarians?

Johnson’s almost assured candidacy essentially erases the most significant argument for a Paul bid: that a libertarian-leaning presence is needed in the field to draw attention to libertarian issues. If both run in 2012, the only difference between the two candidacies would be seen in which libertarian positions were most emphasized. Paul, for example, may devote more energy to railing against the Federal Reserve while Johnson would certainly give more emphasis to legalizing marijuana.

Paul told TheDC he “hasn’t talked details of the politics of the presidential race” with Johnson. It seems quite conceivable, though, that Johnson’s presence in the race could foil a repeat of Paul’s 2008 success by splitting the liberty-leaning vote in the Republican primary.

But for Davis, the fact that many libertarian-leaning voters have to look to the Republican primary to find a candidate to support is a sign that, in some ways, Paul failed in 2008. “Things could have been completely different in 2008 if Paul would have passed the torch,” he said. “Instead, he got in the way of the best thing to come from his campaign.”

“That was the hardest thing to stomach during the 2008 campaign, even more so than Obama getting elected because we truly stood on the cusp of a constitutional revolution,” continued Davis. “Paul just couldn’t step out of the limelight when his time was up.”

So what role could Paul play in 2012 if he chooses not to run? It’s hard to say at this point. For a popular congressman who is famously reluctant to make endorsements, the role as kingmaker may be a stretch. When asked about his potential role in the 2012 elections, Paul told TheDC, “I have not at all thought about whether I could or would play a role in any other way.”

“I think about [running] all the time mainly because people keep asking me about it.” Paul said. “It [will take] another month or two to make a decision” and it depends “more or less if the country is receptive to my ideas.”

“Now my biggest concerns have to do with the value of the dollar and expanding foolishness of our foreign policy…that would have an influence on what I decide to do,” said Paul, adding that if the economy rebounds and America’s foreign policy changes, he may be less inclined to run.

But from a Libertarian Party’s point of view, the absence of the libertarian-leaning Paul in the 2012 presidential field could be exactly what the party needs to grow in strength.

PREMIUM ARTICLE: Subscribe To Keep Reading

Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!

Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!

Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!

Sign Up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
BENEFITS READERS PASS PATRIOTS FOUNDERS
Daily and Breaking Newsletters
Daily Caller Shows
Ad Free Experience
Exclusive Articles
Custom Newsletters
Editor Daily Rundown
Behind The Scenes Coverage
Award Winning Documentaries
Patriot War Room
Patriot Live Chat
Exclusive Events
Gold Membership Card
Tucker Mug

What does Founders Club include?

Tucker Mug and Membership Card
Founders

Readers,

Instead of sucking up to the political and corporate powers that dominate America, The Daily Caller is fighting for you — our readers. We humbly ask you to consider joining us in this fight.

Now that millions of readers are rejecting the increasingly biased and even corrupt corporate media and joining us daily, there are powerful forces lined up to stop us: the old guard of the news media hopes to marginalize us; the big corporate ad agencies want to deprive us of revenue and put us out of business; senators threaten to have our reporters arrested for asking simple questions; the big tech platforms want to limit our ability to communicate with you; and the political party establishments feel threatened by our independence.

We don't complain -- we can't stand complainers -- but we do call it how we see it. We have a fight on our hands, and it's intense. We need your help to smash through the big tech, big media and big government blockade.

We're the insurgent outsiders for a reason: our deep-dive investigations hold the powerful to account. Our original videos undermine their narratives on a daily basis. Even our insistence on having fun infuriates them -- because we won’t bend the knee to political correctness.

One reason we stand apart is because we are not afraid to say we love America. We love her with every fiber of our being, and we think she's worth saving from today’s craziness.

Help us save her.

A second reason we stand out is the sheer number of honest responsible reporters we have helped train. We have trained so many solid reporters that they now hold prominent positions at publications across the political spectrum. Hear a rare reasonable voice at a place like CNN? There’s a good chance they were trained at Daily Caller. Same goes for the numerous Daily Caller alumni dominating the news coverage at outlets such as Fox News, Newsmax, Daily Wire and many others.

Simply put, America needs solid reporters fighting to tell the truth or we will never have honest elections or a fair system. We are working tirelessly to make that happen and we are making a difference.

Since 2010, The Daily Caller has grown immensely. We're in the halls of Congress. We're in the Oval Office. And we're in up to 20 million homes every single month. That's 20 million Americans like you who are impossible to ignore.

We can overcome the forces lined up against all of us. This is an important mission but we can’t do it unless you — the everyday Americans forgotten by the establishment — have our back.

Please consider becoming a Daily Caller Patriot today, and help us keep doing work that holds politicians, corporations and other leaders accountable. Help us thumb our noses at political correctness. Help us train a new generation of news reporters who will actually tell the truth. And help us remind Americans everywhere that there are millions of us who remain clear-eyed about our country's greatness.

In return for membership, Daily Caller Patriots will be able to read The Daily Caller without any of the ads that we have long used to support our mission. We know the ads drive you crazy. They drive us crazy too. But we need revenue to keep the fight going. If you join us, we will cut out the ads for you and put every Lincoln-headed cent we earn into amplifying our voice, training even more solid reporters, and giving you the ad-free experience and lightning fast website you deserve.

Patriots will also be eligible for Patriots Only content, newsletters, chats and live events with our reporters and editors. It's simple: welcome us into your lives, and we'll welcome you into ours.

We can save America together.

Become a Daily Caller Patriot today.

Signature

Neil Patel