Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Scott Pruitt suggested global warming could end up being beneficial to humanity, pointing out that civilizations tend to flourish during warm periods.
“Is it an existential threat, is it something that is unsustainable, or what kind of effect or harm is this going to have?” Pruitt told Nevada’s KSNV TV on Tuesday.
“We know that humans have most flourished during times of, what, warming trends,” Pruitt said in the interview. “I think there’s assumptions made that because the climate is warming, that that necessarily is a bad thing.”
WATCH:
While Pruitt’s comments sent liberal pundits reeling, his argument is not completely out of line with economic projections of global warming. Prominent environmental economist Richard Tol released a study in January that found “the initial impacts of climate change may well be positive.”
Tol looked at 27 different projections of the costs and benefits of future warming, which combined produced positive net benefits over the next 40 to 50 years. Economic costs didn’t go negative until temperatures hit around 1.7 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels.
“Current estimates indicate that climate change will likely have a limited impact on the economy and human welfare in the twenty-first century,” Tol wrote in his study. “However, in the long run the negative impacts dominate the positive ones.”
However, other economists and climate scientists often point to the alleged negative consequences of man-made warming, such as more extreme weather, higher sea levels and lower crop yields.
“Do we really know what the ideal surface temperature should be in the year 2100 in the year 2018?” Pruitt said.
RELATED:
Pruitt also mentioned his support for a red-blue team debate on climate science. Pruitt had planned to pit two teams of scientists against one another on climate science, but so far, EPA has made nothing official.
Pruitt’s remarks come after former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton told a Georgetown University audience that women would be disproportionately harmed by global warming.
“I would say that particularly for women, you’re absolutely right, they will bear the brunt of looking for the food, looking for the firewood, looking for the place to migrate to when all of the grass is finally gone as the desertification moves south,” Clinton said.
Follow Michael on Facebook and Twitter
The Daily Caller News Foundation is working hard to balance out the biased American media. For as little as $3, you can help us. Make a one-time donation to support the quality, independent journalism of TheDCNF. We’re not dependent on commercial or political support and we do not accept any government funding.
All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.
