More Than 1,000 Media Jobs Were Cut In One Day. Is Facebook To Blame?

Chris White | Energy Reporter
  • BuzzFeed is among several media outlets that laid off employees on Wednesday as experts worry that the blood bath is likely far from over.
  • Tech expert Eric Schiffer says Facebook, Twitter and other social media outlets are torching digital journalism and act as a type of “rat poison for journalism jobs.” 
  • BuzzFeed’s layoffs are causing tech experts to consider pushing policies forcing Facebook to pay media outlets for the ability to share their content.

BuzzFeed, Yahoo and other major outlets cut loose more than 1,000 jobs Wednesday in what analysts think is a broadside against journalists. There is also concern Facebook is indirectly responsible for the massacre.

Verizon Media, which owns Yahoo and the Huffington Post, is slashing roughly 800 jobs, or 7 percent, of its global workforce across the organization. BuzzFeed also announced a move to cut 15 percent of its workforce, including jobs in journalism. Other media outlets followed suit.

Digital outlets on the local, national and global level are struggling to keep up in an environment where information is shared for free across a slew of social media platforms, according to Eric Schiffer, the CEO of Patriarch Equity, which focuses on pre-IPO startups in Silicon Valley.

“Facebook and some of the other big tech agitators have acted like rat poison for journalist jobs. When you can get your news for free from a platform, it decimates the firms that are putting out high quality reporting,” Schiffer told The Daily Caller News Foundation. This wave of layoffs could be the beginning of something big, he said.

The logo of news website BuzzFeed is seen on a computer screen in Washington on March 25, 2014. AFP PHOTO/Nicholas KAMM (Photo credit should read NICHOLAS KAMM/AFP/Getty Images)

The logo of news website BuzzFeed is seen on a computer screen in Washington on March 25, 2014. AFP PHOTO/Nicholas KAMM (Photo credit should read NICHOLAS KAMM/AFP/Getty Images)

Media executives agree with that sentiment. “The whole media sector is under pressure, unless you’re a FAANG company (top five tech stocks),” Vox Media CEO Jim Bankoff told reporters in December. “Whether you’re a company that started in the past decade or a century ago, whether you’re funded by a billionaire or a V.C., you’re not immune to the changes in the industry, or the uncertainty that those changes bring.”

Social media companies do have a large impact on the landscape. Concerns about Facebook’s effect on the industry comes less than a year after the company decided in 2018 to de-emphasize news on the platform. Outlets worried that the change in algorithm would wipe out digital journalism and cause several digital companies to pare down.

Conservative outlet Independent Journal Review (IJR) terminated several employees in February 2018, leaving an unclear future for the millennial-focused conservative website that has recently faced a declining audience and internal strife. An analytics report from SimilarWeb.com shows a substantial drop in traffic before the outlet cut its workforce.

The sharing industry is causing the pain, Schiffer noted. “You are witnessing a massacre in journalism. Journalists who participated have done it as if they were entering into their own drive by shooting,” he said, noting how sharing article and content tends to give away the golden goose. “We are in the early innings.” Are there solutions?

Schiffer suggested that it might be a good idea to force tech companies to pay news outlets for the responsibility of sharing news. His idea resembles the European model, where lawmakers have proposed a copyright directive forcing tech giants to pay publishers for linking to their content. The directive hit a speed bump five days ago when member states failed to agree on rules.

Meanwhile, Facebook has been under constant criticism from the likes of The New York Times and The Washington Post, among others, over the Silicon Valley company’s use of its users’ personal data. NYT CEO Mark Thompson argued in June 2018 that Facebook’s algorithms might not be the best arbiter to use when distinguishing fake news from legitimate outlets.

Media outlets have even resorted to publishing ads on Facebook inviting users to delete their profiles. (RELATED: NY Times CEO: Facebook’s Fake News Algorithm Will ‘Damage’ Democracy)

TheNYT’s coverage of Facebook has been almost exclusively negative since the 2016 presidential elections, according to tech researcher Joe Hovde, a full-time data analyst at Residual Thoughts. TheNYT ran ads on Facebook giving users a step-by-step guide on how to slowly pull back from the Silicon Valley company’s platform.

Something has to be done about social media, Schiffer noted, because “this is a phenomenon that will withstand The New York Times’ pressure. They will survive. Or some iteration of that kind will survive.”

Follow Chris White on Facebook and Twitter

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.

Tags : buzzfeed news the new york times verizon
Loading comments...
© Copyright 2010 - 2018 | The Daily Caller