Politics

Texas Appeals Court Rejects Democrats Push To Expand Mail-In Voting

(Photo by LOGAN CYRUS/AFP via Getty Images)

Font Size:

The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected Texas Democrats’ attempt to expand mail-in voting Thursday, instead siding with state Republicans.

Texas Democrats argued that the states current law, which allows for mail-in voting for voters who have a disability, are sick, are absent or who are over 65 , violates the 26th Amendment, which protects voters from age discrimination.

However, the three judge panel disagreed, ruling that “conferring a privilege” to some voters, such as those over the age of 65, “does not alone violate the Twenty-Sixth Amendment.”

“A law that makes it easier for others to vote does not abridge any person’s right to vote for the purposes of the Twenty-Sixth Amendment.”

The majority added the Democrats claim that voters over the age of 65 who get to vote by mail without an excuse constitutes, during a pandemic, an abridgment of a younger citizen’s right to vote on account of age “fails because adding a benefit to another class of voters does not deny or abridge the plaintiffs’ Twenty-Sixth Amendment right to vote.”

The decision vacated a lower court’s ruling that required the state to expand mail-in voting to all eligible voters. However, the case will return to a lower court to consider the remaining arguments against the law.

DENVER, CO - JUNE 30: Election judge Miriam Dubinsky sanitizes a voting booth as people vote in the primary election on June 30, 2020 in Denver, Colorado. Voters will decide between former Gov. John Hickenlooper and former Colorado House of Representatives Speaker Andrew Romanoff to face off in the November U.S. Senate race against Sen. Cory Gardner. (Photo by Michael Ciaglo/Getty Images)

DENVER, CO – JUNE 30: Election judge Miriam Dubinsky sanitizes a voting booth (Photo by Michael Ciaglo/Getty Images)

Judge Carl Stewart dissented on Thursday’s ruling, arguing younger voters are disadvantaged because they are more at risk for voting in person due to the pandemic.

“By giving younger voters fewer options, especially in the context of a dangerous pandemic where in-person voting is risky to public health and safety, their voting rights are abridged in relation to older voters who do not face this burden.”

The court previously ruled  that fear of contracting the coronavirus was not a sufficient reason to request an absentee ballot.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton applauded the court’s decision in an official statement.

“I am pleased that the Fifth Circuit correctly upheld Texas’s vote-by-mail laws, and I commend the court for concluding that Texas’s decision to allow elderly voters to vote by mail does not violate the 26th Amendment. We will continue to protect the integrity of Texas elections and uphold the rule of law.”

The decision comes days after Judge Orlando L. Garcia of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas ruled the state’s current process for reviewing mail-in ballots is unconstitutional. (RELATED: Judge Halts Tennessee Law That Limited Mail Voting From First-Time Voters)

Judge Garcia said the state’s signature-comparison procedures were “inherently fraught with error, and voters are provided with no meaningful opportunity to cure improperly rejected ballots.”

Texas election officials could reject ballots if they felt the signature on the ballot envelopes didn’t match the signature on the ballot. However, state law does not require voters get the chance to prove the signatures were valid. The decision will now force Texas election officials to notify voters if there is an error with their mail in ballot and give them an opportunity to address the issue.