Opinion

King Barack: Presidents enforce Congress’s laws, they don’t ‘negotiate’ over them

Brion McClanahan Author, The Founding Fathers Guide to the Constitution
Font Size:

In January 1788, Luther Martin of Maryland wrote, “And it was further argued, even if he [the President] was allowed a negative, it ought not to be of so great extent as that given by the system, since his single voice is to countervail the whole of either branch, and any number less than two-thirds of the other… .”

Luther was speaking of the debate over the presidential veto at the Philadelphia Convention of 1787.  Fear of executive power saturated the debates at both the Philadelphia Convention and the various state ratifying conventions held to give the Constitution its “vitality,” as James Madison later wrote. No one in that generation (publicly) wanted an elected king.

Luther consistently railed against it, and it may be surprising to most Americans in the modern age that the president was never intended to be the chief legislator. It would be news to Bloomberg, some liberal bloggers, and even President Barack Obama himself, given his refusal to negotiate with his “bomb-throwing” opponents in this fabricated budget “crisis.” According to the Constitution as ratified by the founding generation, this isn’t his job. Nor would members of the founding generation agree with the use of the veto as a legislative hammer.

James Wilson of Pennsylvania proposed at the Philadelphia Convention that the president have “an absolute negative” over proposed legislation. He was alone in this fight. Elbridge Gerry of Massachusetts thought this was unnecessary because “the best men in the community would be comprised in the two branches” of Congress. Benjamin Franklin, in one of his rare speeches at the convention, thought that such a power would reduce the legislature into “compleat [sic] subjection to the will of the Executive.” And Gunning Bedford of  Delaware said that, “The Representatives of the People (the House of Representatives) were the best judges of what was for their interest, and ought to be under no external controul [sic] whatever.” George Mason of Virginia was more direct. Such a power, he said, would lead to a dangerous place, an “elective” monarchy.

The fight continued in the state ratifying conventions and in the press.  William Findley of Pennsylvania, speaking at the state ratifying convention, argued that the veto power as written dangerously blended the legislative and executive branch because no law could be passed without the president’s  “revision.” “The Impartial Examiner” of Virginia wrote in 1788 that the veto power would be one step toward an absolute monarchy. “If the system proposed had been calculated to extend his authority a little farther, he would preponderate against all — he alone would possess the sovereignty of America.”

By that time, of course, the current language of the veto power had already been codified. The president can veto legislation, but a two-thirds majority of both houses could override his veto. Madison thought this would have the same effect as an absolute negative, but he argued the president would never “have firmness eno’ to resist the Legislature unless backed by a certain part of the body itself.” James Wilson insisted at the Pennsylvania Ratifying Convention that “no bill passes in consequence of having his [the president’s] assent…” and that the president would be guided by the “strict propriety of language” in the Constitution, meaning he was not the chief legislator nor could he “read between the lines.”

Herein lies the modern problem. Obama’s intransigence has the support from Senate Democrats, but it should be Harry Reid and Dick Durbin, not Obama, negotiating with House Republicans. Obama is violating his oath as president in this process. His job is to execute the laws congress passes.  He has violated his oath in this regard several times, even as it pertains to Obamacare specifically, and by refusing to “negotiate” with Republicans over a spending bill is unconstitutionally interjecting himself in the legislative process.

The founding generation would agree. The first five presidents — all from the founding generation — issued a total of 10 vetoes in thirty-six years, eight of which were traditional vetoes with a message to Congress explaining their action. All bills were vetoed on constitutional grounds, meaning the president thought the law in question violated the Constitution. Obama cannot say that about the current proposals from the House of Representatives. The Congress is acting within its constitutional power to defund a federal program, one that is constitutionally dubious from the beginning. By grandstanding against congressional power of the purse, Obama has exceeded his authority and has become what the founding generation feared, an elected king.

Unfortunately, he is not alone. Virtually every president in the last one-hundred years has departed from the original understanding of the veto power. Americans on both sides of the political spectrum need to be consistent in their outrage at executive dictatorship. Otherwise, we are left with ever-expanding executive power. Franklin opined in the Philadelphia Convention that, “The executive will be always increasing here, as elsewhere, till it ends in a monarchy.” Perhaps he was more right than he knew. The American people are behind arresting this abuse and that disaster that is Obamacare. Congress is right to act.

PREMIUM ARTICLE: Subscribe To Keep Reading

Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!

Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!

Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!

Sign Up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
BENEFITS READERS PASS PATRIOTS FOUNDERS
Daily and Breaking Newsletters
Daily Caller Shows
Ad Free Experience
Exclusive Articles
Custom Newsletters
Editor Daily Rundown
Behind The Scenes Coverage
Award Winning Documentaries
Patriot War Room
Patriot Live Chat
Exclusive Events
Gold Membership Card
Tucker Mug

What does Founders Club include?

Tucker Mug and Membership Card
Founders

Readers,

Instead of sucking up to the political and corporate powers that dominate America, The Daily Caller is fighting for you — our readers. We humbly ask you to consider joining us in this fight.

Now that millions of readers are rejecting the increasingly biased and even corrupt corporate media and joining us daily, there are powerful forces lined up to stop us: the old guard of the news media hopes to marginalize us; the big corporate ad agencies want to deprive us of revenue and put us out of business; senators threaten to have our reporters arrested for asking simple questions; the big tech platforms want to limit our ability to communicate with you; and the political party establishments feel threatened by our independence.

We don't complain -- we can't stand complainers -- but we do call it how we see it. We have a fight on our hands, and it's intense. We need your help to smash through the big tech, big media and big government blockade.

We're the insurgent outsiders for a reason: our deep-dive investigations hold the powerful to account. Our original videos undermine their narratives on a daily basis. Even our insistence on having fun infuriates them -- because we won’t bend the knee to political correctness.

One reason we stand apart is because we are not afraid to say we love America. We love her with every fiber of our being, and we think she's worth saving from today’s craziness.

Help us save her.

A second reason we stand out is the sheer number of honest responsible reporters we have helped train. We have trained so many solid reporters that they now hold prominent positions at publications across the political spectrum. Hear a rare reasonable voice at a place like CNN? There’s a good chance they were trained at Daily Caller. Same goes for the numerous Daily Caller alumni dominating the news coverage at outlets such as Fox News, Newsmax, Daily Wire and many others.

Simply put, America needs solid reporters fighting to tell the truth or we will never have honest elections or a fair system. We are working tirelessly to make that happen and we are making a difference.

Since 2010, The Daily Caller has grown immensely. We're in the halls of Congress. We're in the Oval Office. And we're in up to 20 million homes every single month. That's 20 million Americans like you who are impossible to ignore.

We can overcome the forces lined up against all of us. This is an important mission but we can’t do it unless you — the everyday Americans forgotten by the establishment — have our back.

Please consider becoming a Daily Caller Patriot today, and help us keep doing work that holds politicians, corporations and other leaders accountable. Help us thumb our noses at political correctness. Help us train a new generation of news reporters who will actually tell the truth. And help us remind Americans everywhere that there are millions of us who remain clear-eyed about our country's greatness.

In return for membership, Daily Caller Patriots will be able to read The Daily Caller without any of the ads that we have long used to support our mission. We know the ads drive you crazy. They drive us crazy too. But we need revenue to keep the fight going. If you join us, we will cut out the ads for you and put every Lincoln-headed cent we earn into amplifying our voice, training even more solid reporters, and giving you the ad-free experience and lightning fast website you deserve.

Patriots will also be eligible for Patriots Only content, newsletters, chats and live events with our reporters and editors. It's simple: welcome us into your lives, and we'll welcome you into ours.

We can save America together.

Become a Daily Caller Patriot today.

Signature

Neil Patel