California residents will decide whether or not to ban hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, at the ballot box this coming Tuesday in Monterey County.
The proposed ban would directly restrict fracking and the drilling of new wells, in addition to restricting how oil companies dispose of water from the process. The vote is being closely watched by both national environmental and industry groups.
Monterey County for Energy Independence, which opposes the ban, has already spent almost $5.5 million dollars fighting it. The county is located where oil and natural gas is actually produced. Monterey’s two neighboring counties, San Benito and Santa Cruz, have banned fracking, but neither has a sizable oil industry.
The oil and gas industry has historically been regulated by the state, not local, government across much of America. The oil and gas industry is worried that local rulings could create a regulatory “patchwork,” which could hamper energy development in California. Environmental groups The Sierra Club, Greenpeace, Food and Water Watch, and local groups currently support local bans on fracking largely because they claim it contaminates ground water and makes the air dirtier.
Judges have been hostile to the environmental legal theory of banning fracking at the local level. Colorado’s Supreme Court struck down local fracking bans in early May, a federal judge did the same thing in West Virginia in mid-June as did Louisiana’s Supreme Court. Many states have passed laws expressly preventing local fracking bans.
Despite these legal setbacks, campaign finance disclosure reports show that these environmentalist groups have donated time and money supporting local fracking bans initiatives, including time to collect signatures and advertisements for signature gatherers on behalf of the initiative. Activists with these green groups are calling the initiatives “the biggest,” most important fight on behalf of the environment this year.
A five-year long study by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) found that fracking has “not led to widespread, systemic impacts to drinking water resources.” The idea fracking can contaminate aquifers defies “basic geology [which] prevents such contamination from starting below ground,” according to the science magazine Popular Mechanics.
Numerous studies from regulatory bodies, academics and the U.S. Geological Survey prove fracking does not contaminate drinking water.
Similarly, EPA data found that fracking has significantly decreased air pollutants across the country. States with economies that are reliant on fracking have about 10 percent cleaner air than states that haven’t embraced the process, according to an analysis of EPA data by The Daily Caller News Foundation.
Send tips to andrew@
All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact licensing@dailycallernewsfoundation.org.
