New York City may fine individuals up to $250,000 if they use the term “illegal alien” in a derogatory way, according to an announcement from the city’s Commission on Human Rights this week.
“BREAKING: New York City has made it illegal to threaten to call ICE based on a discriminatory motive or to tell someone ‘go back to your country.’ Hate has no place here,” the City of New York tweeted Thursday.
BREAKING:
New York City has made it illegal to threaten to call ICE based on a discriminatory motive or to tell someone “go back to your country.” Hate has no place here. pic.twitter.com/8PaIozjQty— City of New York (@nycgov) September 26, 2019
In addition, “derogatory use of the word ‘illegal alien'” can result in a fine.
“The guidance states that the use of the term ‘illegal alien,’ among others, when used with the intent to demean, humiliate, or harass a person, is illegal under the law.”
Democratic Mayor Bill De Blasio promote the new policy on Twitter and warned others that they will face “consequences” for insulting illegal immigrants.
“If you want to come into the ultimate city of immigrants and try to spread hate, you WILL face the consequences,” De Blasio said.
If you want to come into the ultimate city of immigrants and try to spread hate, you WILL face the consequences. https://t.co/QWy54wADZ1
— Mayor Bill de Blasio (@NYCMayor) September 27, 2019
The New York mayor recently dropped out of the 2020 Democratic primary race among rock bottom poll numbers. (RELATED: ‘Biggest Story In Years’: Trump Trolls De Blasio After New York Mayor Drops POTUS Bid)
During his tenure as mayor, De Blasio has made protecting illegal immigrants a priority. In 2017, he claimed that illegal immigrants were “law-abiding.”
Many Twitter users reacted with confusion at the legality of the new rule.
“Another Trump reelection contribution,” Adam Baldwin said.
Another Trump reelection contribution:https://t.co/FrLlBypYN5
— Adam Baldwin (@AdamBaldwin) September 28, 2019
“Enjoy your lawsuits,” Commentary writer Noah Rothman said.
Enjoy your lawsuits. https://t.co/KVEUUN8yDw
— Noah Rothman (@NoahCRothman) September 28, 2019
“I’ve dedicated my career fighting to prevent the deportation of immigrants, and this scares me. The unconstitutional criminalization and restriction of unpopular speech is something that should scare us all,” immigration lawyer Matthew Kolken said.
I’ve dedicated my career fighting to prevent the deportation of immigrants, and this scares me. The unconstitutional criminalization and restriction of unpopular speech is something that should scare us all. https://t.co/wrff3VZIoB
— Matthew Kolken (@mkolken) September 29, 2019
“‘Illegal alien’ remains the most technically, legal, and historically precise term to describe a non-citizen in the country without permission/documentation, but sure let’s go ahead and make its use verboten. What could possibly go wrong?” Daily Wire Editor Josh Hammer said.
“Illegal alien” remains the most technically, legal, and historically precise term to describe a non-citizen in the country without permission/documentation, but sure let’s go ahead and make its use verboten. What could possibly go wrong?
— Josh Hammer (@josh_hammer) September 29, 2019
Others went off on the new law as well:
How is this even remotely constitutional https://t.co/xLS9xpazOB
— Jeremy Frankel (@FrankelJeremy) September 29, 2019
When did the Gestapo take over @NYC ? https://t.co/VrXFORYLWR
— Tony Shaffer (@T_S_P_O_O_K_Y) September 29, 2019
De Blasio is making it *illegal* to use words that he doesn’t like https://t.co/bQesWF25Lb
— Jordan Schachtel (@JordanSchachtel) September 29, 2019
Please explain to me how New York expects to determine someone’s motive?
Has De Blaise perfected mind-reading? https://t.co/MEiqXITuSv
— Cabot Phillips (@cabot_phillips) September 29, 2019
Communism… https://t.co/ZCdNfZiO0O
— Tom Fitton (@TomFitton) September 28, 2019
How does this work in practice? Are we determining whether to prosecute based on the motives of the person reporting? Is this going to apply to all types of violations? This seems so divorced from legal logic, it’s sort of astounding. https://t.co/sr7DYEcEYD
— Erielle Davidson (@politicalelle) September 28, 2019