Opinion

FCC Commissioner: Broadcast localism a remnant of yesteryear

Robert McDowell Contributor
Font Size:

As the new year opens, Washington policymakers are spending much of their brainpower trying to see well beyond 2010 in order to understand how proposed regulations might shape America’s future.  For example, my own agency–the Federal Communications Commission–confronts momentous opportunities for prognostication as it grapples with whether it can, or should, regulate the Internet and how it can foster more growth of the broadband facilities upon which that marvelously transformative medium depends.  The stakes are high.

I don’t need soothsaying skills, however, when it comes to broadcast regulation.  In that arena, we often aren’t talking about the future, or even the present–instead, we keep talking about the past.  And so, as the FCC undertakes a new review of its broadcast ownership rules this year, I expect to hear renewed calls for reimposing various “localism” rules on TV and radio stations.  It remains to be seen whether we will hear any new and logical justifications for resurrecting an outmoded regulatory construct.

The term localism refers generally to the fact that broadcast stations are licensed to serve individual communities in exchange for serving the needs and interests of the people in those locales.  The basic concept makes sense.  In fact, localism as a business imperative is more compelling in today’s fragmented media marketplace than ever before.  Four decades ago, when I was a child, local broadcast stations were far fewer in number.  No other electronic media existed.  These days, my children have access to a vast array of media options:  several additional local broadcast stations, hundreds more cable and satellite channels, and virtually innumerable choices among audio, video and text content on the Internet.  For local broadcasters to survive in this environment, they have to differentiate themselves from the pack.  The smart ones are doing just that by offering local news and other locally oriented programming that generates interest and loyalty among their viewers and listeners.

But some proponents of regulation don’t believe that business survival alone is sufficient to ensure that broadcast stations serve their communities.  They want mandates that would, directly or indirectly, require broadcasters to air the government’s idea of the kind of programming a local audience should want or need.  Broadcast rules like that were in place 40 years ago.  Those regulations required stations to engage in formal, documented “ascertainment” studies to survey community needs and to provide detailed summations, reflecting government-determined content categories, of the programming they aired.  Yet by the late 1970s, the FCC started to rethink such proscriptive dictates–and by the 1980s, the growth of cable television and the addition of new broadcast stations to the airwaves convinced the Commission that it could rely on marketplace forces, rather than regulatory commands, to foster the delivery of programming that consumers valued.

Contentious broadcast ownership proceedings over the last several years, however, have offered new hope to fans of the old localism regulatory scheme.  Since 2007, the FCC has been contemplating several proposals for more stringent rules.  One would require stations to convene government-supervised community advisory boards to help ascertain the local audience’s programming needs and desires (and perhaps influence broadcasters’ editorial decision-making).  Another proposal calls for shortened license terms coupled with “processing guidelines” for review of renewal applications, such as minimum percentages of time to ensure that stations air a proscribed amount of locally oriented programming.

In addition, the Commission already has adopted (over my objection) a new, highly complex “Enhanced Disclosure” form for TV stations–a form that is so onerous that it has been hung up for months at the Office of Management and Budget over arguments that it violates government paperwork-reduction laws.  Some have even estimated that the Enhanced Disclosure form would require each broadcaster to hire up to two more employees to do nothing all day but fill it out.  Radio licensees should be grateful that the TV folks were in the cross-hairs on the form first, but they might not be left alone for long.  Whatever final guise it may take, the form is likely to become a main weapon in challenges to future license renewals.

In the meantime, all of us should be asking why the Commission needs to devote scarce time and resources to reviving any old localism rules at all.  Broadcasters today face a level of competition for audiences that was unimaginable 40, 20 or even 10 years ago.  They must adapt to meet the needs and desires of their communities if they want to stay alive.

Although it’s hard to predict precisely what broadcasters’ 21st Century future may be, I am confident that stations will never again have the kind of media clout that they allegedly had in their 20th Century past.  The Internet alone makes a mockery of the notion broadcasters have power to act as “gatekeepers” to wield “bottleneck control” over news, information or entertainment programming.  That old notion is the premise upon which the original localism rules stood, but a fondness for history is not a good enough reason to steer the FCC’s rules back in time – and in the wrong direction.

Robert M. McDowell is a Federal Communications Commissioner.

PREMIUM ARTICLE: Subscribe To Keep Reading

Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!

Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!

Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!

Sign Up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
BENEFITS READERS PASS PATRIOTS FOUNDERS
Daily and Breaking Newsletters
Daily Caller Shows
Ad Free Experience
Exclusive Articles
Custom Newsletters
Editor Daily Rundown
Behind The Scenes Coverage
Award Winning Documentaries
Patriot War Room
Patriot Live Chat
Exclusive Events
Gold Membership Card
Tucker Mug

What does Founders Club include?

Tucker Mug and Membership Card
Founders

Readers,

Instead of sucking up to the political and corporate powers that dominate America, The Daily Caller is fighting for you — our readers. We humbly ask you to consider joining us in this fight.

Now that millions of readers are rejecting the increasingly biased and even corrupt corporate media and joining us daily, there are powerful forces lined up to stop us: the old guard of the news media hopes to marginalize us; the big corporate ad agencies want to deprive us of revenue and put us out of business; senators threaten to have our reporters arrested for asking simple questions; the big tech platforms want to limit our ability to communicate with you; and the political party establishments feel threatened by our independence.

We don't complain -- we can't stand complainers -- but we do call it how we see it. We have a fight on our hands, and it's intense. We need your help to smash through the big tech, big media and big government blockade.

We're the insurgent outsiders for a reason: our deep-dive investigations hold the powerful to account. Our original videos undermine their narratives on a daily basis. Even our insistence on having fun infuriates them -- because we won’t bend the knee to political correctness.

One reason we stand apart is because we are not afraid to say we love America. We love her with every fiber of our being, and we think she's worth saving from today’s craziness.

Help us save her.

A second reason we stand out is the sheer number of honest responsible reporters we have helped train. We have trained so many solid reporters that they now hold prominent positions at publications across the political spectrum. Hear a rare reasonable voice at a place like CNN? There’s a good chance they were trained at Daily Caller. Same goes for the numerous Daily Caller alumni dominating the news coverage at outlets such as Fox News, Newsmax, Daily Wire and many others.

Simply put, America needs solid reporters fighting to tell the truth or we will never have honest elections or a fair system. We are working tirelessly to make that happen and we are making a difference.

Since 2010, The Daily Caller has grown immensely. We're in the halls of Congress. We're in the Oval Office. And we're in up to 20 million homes every single month. That's 20 million Americans like you who are impossible to ignore.

We can overcome the forces lined up against all of us. This is an important mission but we can’t do it unless you — the everyday Americans forgotten by the establishment — have our back.

Please consider becoming a Daily Caller Patriot today, and help us keep doing work that holds politicians, corporations and other leaders accountable. Help us thumb our noses at political correctness. Help us train a new generation of news reporters who will actually tell the truth. And help us remind Americans everywhere that there are millions of us who remain clear-eyed about our country's greatness.

In return for membership, Daily Caller Patriots will be able to read The Daily Caller without any of the ads that we have long used to support our mission. We know the ads drive you crazy. They drive us crazy too. But we need revenue to keep the fight going. If you join us, we will cut out the ads for you and put every Lincoln-headed cent we earn into amplifying our voice, training even more solid reporters, and giving you the ad-free experience and lightning fast website you deserve.

Patriots will also be eligible for Patriots Only content, newsletters, chats and live events with our reporters and editors. It's simple: welcome us into your lives, and we'll welcome you into ours.

We can save America together.

Become a Daily Caller Patriot today.

Signature

Neil Patel