Globalization: Curse or Cure? Policies to Harness Global Economic Integration to Solve Our Economic Challenge (Policy Analysis)

Font Size:

Globalization holds tremendous promise to

improve human welfare but can also cause conflicts

and crises as witnessed during 2007–09.

How will competition for resources, employment,

and growth shape economic policies among developed

nations as they attempt to maintain productivity

growth, social protections, and extensive

political and cultural freedoms?

The processes associated with economic globalization—

such as free trade, business outsourcing,

capital mobility, and so on—generate considerable

public apprehension because of the

economic uncertainty they portend. But crossnational

production supply chains have now

become so extensive that the recession-induced

decline in global trade is causing considerable economic

distress in developed countries.

In contrast, emerging countries—especially

Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Korea—have

experienced only modest declines in economic

growth. As those nations continue to advance economically

and output growth in developed nations

recovers, the process of globalization will resume.

But with the Doha round of multilateral trade

negotiations stalled, bilateral and regional trade

agreements may come to dominate that process.

Regardless of how globalization progresses, policymakers

in developed nations remain concerned

about whether domestic output and employment

growth can recover as rapidly as after recessions

past. Those concerns are magnified by prospective

population aging in developed countries.

Intensifying foreign competition and employment

uncertainty could provoke calls by industry

lobbyists and displaced workers for additional

government protections. And worker migration

toward developed nations will continue, spurred

by wage differentials between developed and

developing countries. Younger immigrants may

eventually help developed nations to ease the economic

challenge posed by population aging, but

immigrants are often viewed as competing for

jobs, adding to public welfare costs, and reducing

social cohesion. This paper offers policy recommendations

for developed nations to reduce

globalization’s negative effects and, indeed, harness

it for solving aging-related economic challenges.

Globalization holds tremendous promise to

improve human welfare but can also cause conflicts

and crises as witnessed during 2007–09.

How will competition for resources, employment,

and growth shape economic policies among developed

nations as they attempt to maintain productivity

growth, social protections, and extensive

political and cultural freedoms?

The processes associated with economic globalization—

such as free trade, business outsourcing,

capital mobility, and so on—generate considerable

public apprehension because of the

economic uncertainty they portend. But crossnational

production supply chains have now

become so extensive that the recession-induced

decline in global trade is causing considerable economic

distress in developed countries.

In contrast, emerging countries—especially

Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Korea—have

experienced only modest declines in economic

growth. As those nations continue to advance economically

and output growth in developed nations

recovers, the process of globalization will resume.

But with the Doha round of multilateral trade

negotiations stalled, bilateral and regional trade

agreements may come to dominate that process.

Regardless of how globalization progresses, policymakers

in developed nations remain concerned

about whether domestic output and employment

growth can recover as rapidly as after recessions

past. Those concerns are magnified by prospective

population aging in developed countries.

Intensifying foreign competition and employment

uncertainty could provoke calls by industry

lobbyists and displaced workers for additional

government protections. And worker migration

toward developed nations will continue, spurred

by wage differentials between developed and

developing countries. Younger immigrants may

eventually help developed nations to ease the economic

challenge posed by population aging, but

immigrants are often viewed as competing for

jobs, adding to public welfare costs, and reducing

social cohesion. This paper offers policy recommendations

for developed nations to reduce

globalization’s negative effects and, indeed, harness

it for solving aging-related economic challenges.

Jagadeesh Gokhale is senior fellow at the Cato Institute. His research focuses on entitlement reform, labor productivity and compensation, U.S. fiscal policy, and the impact of fiscal policy on future generations. This paper is a longer version of his article “Globalization, Economic Crisis, and the New 21st Century World Economic Order,” in A New Conservative Agenda for the 21st Century (forthcoming).