The Daily Caller

The Daily Caller

A civic reawakening: The Tea Party movement

This week, conservatives of all stripes will gather in Washington for the annual Conservative Political Action Conference. As this event also marks the one-year anniversary of the birth of the Tea Party movement, I think it is particularly appropriate to take a step back and reflect on the impact of the movement in its short one-year history.

There is a good deal of talk within the broader conservative movement and from the media peanut gallery regarding the future of the Tea Party movement. Many observers have pointed to “controversy” surrounding the relatively small Tea Party Convention, using Sarah Palin as an example that the movement is fracturing. While this is one of the smaller Tea Parties that have been thrown, it has received more attention than the million-taxpayer march on Washington last September. It is…curious.

Despite the media’s desire to create a simple (though oft-shifting) narrative of this grassroots movement, the vast majority of Tea Partiers recognize that no one organization, person or event speaks for the broad frustrations felt and expressed by millions of concerned citizens. A top-down structure of grassroots organizing makes for a great résumé builder, not necessarily a movement builder. It is both counterproductive and highly hubristic to claim the mantle of the Tea Party group, event or leader. From small towns to big cities to national Tea Party events, groups thrive when they move past petty hierarchies and credit grabbing and remember why they got off of their couches and into the streets in the first place: to have a tangible impact on the direction of our country.

How impactful this movement has been is nothing short of extraordinary. Just one year ago, I—like many Americans—was deeply disheartened and concerned about the direction of our nation. A popularly elected president had promised to “fundamentally transform the United States” on the campaign trail. World leaders and newspapers were marking the death of free-market capitalism.

Fortunately, a civic reawakening of sorts kept concerned citizens from merely bracing themselves for the shockwaves of a radically changing political environment. In “Rules for Radicals,” Saul Alinsky warned of an inevitable counter-revolution to the radical policies he espoused—policies, and tactics, that have been deployed day in and day out in the halls of Washington over the past year. The Tea Party movement is that counter-revolution. It is the instinctive American backlash to a government that has grossly overstepped its bounds exemplified in bailouts, handouts, and the persistent pursuit of radically expanding the size and scope of government though cap and trade, government-run health care initiatives, and other initiatives.

Democrats still control the White House and both chambers of Congress and, despite the concerns of their confused, uneducated constituents, they show no signs of relenting on their promise to deliver this brave new America. Yet today I’m more hopeful than ever about the future of our nation. From the Tax Day Tea Parties of April, to the August health care town hall protests, to the enormously successfully Sept. 12 march on Washington, more and more Americans are involving themselves in the political process. Not only are they opening their eyes and taking to the streets, but they’re dusting off and proudly reaffirming the founding principles of our nation, principles proclaimed outmoded and dead by the cynical political class just one year ago.

  • collie

    Just a question?? How does Sarah Palin say she is part of the Tea Party and then goes and throws her support behind John MCCain?? Isn’t this one of the things we want to stop? You know politicians that say they are conservative and then support a liberal??
    Time for Sarah to walk the walk and not just talk the talk..

  • Pingback: Observations on the New Tea Party « Ramparts 360

  • ohplease

    Let us not forget who got us into this mess in the first place…two (un-necessary) wars and tax cuts for the rich along with unregulated financial markets. While our current administration has been lackluster at best, the previous one(s) dug the hole we are currently in!

    If only these “tea-party” participants would stop drinking the “kool-aid” and think for themselves, maybe our country wouldnt be in such shambles.

    • libertyatstake

      What’s the cost per “job created or saved” by the (now) $862B Stimulus bill?

      Please show your work when you turn in your answer.

      http://libertyatstake.blogspot.com/

    • bamagirl44

      The fact that so many people did not “think for themselves” in 2008 and the media did not vet Obama is what got us in this mess. As for the previous admin digging this hole, they had plenty of help from a Congress that went Democrat in 2006 and that is when the real spending started. Also, you can look to Fannie and Freddie and those who were running it into the ground for a lot of this mess.

      • ducktape

        how about the complex financial derivatives touted by Goldman Sachs and others?? of course that had nothing to do with anything?? your lack of knowledege of economics/finance is no excuse to blame the Dems. You obviously could not have done any better yourself.

  • ignatiusreilly

    I really wanted to finish this, but you lost me at “impactful”.

    The Urban Dictionary has a fitting entry for this fake word:

    “A non-existent word coined by corporate advertising, marketing and business drones to make their work sound far more useful, exciting and beneficial to humanity than it really is. This term is most frequently used in “team building” seminars and conferences in which said drones discuss the most effective ways to convince consumer zombies to purchase crap they clearly do not need or even want.”

    Sounds about right.