Northrop Grumman, citing unfairness, declines to compete in $40 billion tanker contract
Follow Alex Pappas
Get Alex Pappas Feed
Northrop Grumman, which in 2008 was named the victor in the Pentagon’s $40 billion KC-X tanker competition only to have the win taken away, announced on Monday that it will not re-submit its bid, citing unfairness in the contest with Boeing.
Wes Bush, chief executive of Northrop Grumman Corporation, said in a statement that the company opted not to submit a bid to the Department of Defense after reaching the conclusion that proposal “clearly favors Boeing’s smaller refueling tanker and does not provide adequate value recognition of the added capability of a larger tanker, precluding us from any competitive opportunity.”
Sen. Jeff Sessions, a Republican from Alabama, called it “tragic” and said “the Obama Defense Department rewrote the bid rules in such a biased fashion that only one team felt it could win.”
Leaders in Alabama, where Northrop planned to assemble tankers if awarded the contract, had favored a split-buy compromise for the contentious $40 billion tanker refueling contract between Boeing and Northrop Grumman.
“This is truly a dark day for the American warfighter and for the Pentagon,” Sessions said in a statement. “Today’s withdrawal by the Northrop Grumman team is concrete proof that the dramatic changes in the way that the Pentagon will evaluate competing proposals had the effect of eliminating the superior aircraft that was the low bidder in the last competition.
In 2004, the bidding process fell apart after charges of corruption involving Boeing. Northrop in 2008 was awarded the contract, though it was rescinded after protests from Boeing.
Critics argued that if Northrop Grumman, a subsidiary of foreign-owned EADS, won the contract that it would not create American jobs like Boeing would. Sessions took issue with those critics, pointing out that the aircraft would have been built in Mobile, Ala., “with suppliers employing Americans in all 50 states, employing 48,000 Americans.”
Rep. Jo Bonner, who represents the Alabama district where the Northrop tankers would have been assembled, said he is “outraged at the Defense Department’s bungling of this contract for what is now the third time.”
“The Pentagon … handed the president a $35 billion sole-source hot-potato, under circumstances that are highly suspect,” Bonner said in a statement. “The president must now intervene to protect the interests of the taxpayer and the men and women of our military.”
Boeing spokesman Sean McCormack could not be reached for comment.
Last month, Northrop faced another setback when Democratic Washington Rep. Norm Dicks, an ardent supporter of Boeing, took over the gavel from the late Rep. John Murtha as chairman of the Defense Appropriations Subcommittee.
(No Ratings Yet)
Loading ...
Hopefully, this means that GSA can be dissolved since POTUS is redefining the rules of government procurement. Although in this case, with Boeing announcing it’s plan to move manufacturing to South Carolina due to irreconcilable differences with the union, wil this ridiculous admin. pull the contract.
Sounds like Grummin had the chance to redesign smaller but decided to take their ball & go home.
scorpidoo….Firstly, your assertion that Bush was never treated so badly is a complete crock. The Vicious and Vile behavior of you Lefties toward Bush and Cheney is exactly why the discourse is so ugly today. We, on the Right, have decided that we are no longer going to turn the other cheek. The best part is that we haven’t even warmed up yet. When IT hits the fan, there are over 50 years of grievances that will be addressed. Which brings me to my second point.
The Race-Card is over, scorpidoo! Dim Wits like you, just don’t know it yet. Unfounded charges of Racism are a Hate Crime and in the near future, these Race Crimes will be aggressively prosecuted under the Hate Crimes Act. You snotty Phucks have had a ‘field day’ for way too long and very soon it will be time for real Reparations.