Politics

Florida’s congressional delegation butts heads with Arne Duncan over for-profit colleges

Mike Riggs Contributor
Font Size:

Education Secretary Arne Duncan, the oft-criticized former head of the Chicago Public School System, has a new nemesis. This time, it’s not teachers unions lambasting the Education secretary for giving them the cold shoulder. Nor is it a mutant cohort of politically diverse education advocates howling about Race to the Top’s alleged politicization.

Duncan’s new nemesis is a coalition of Florida congressional representatives. Backed by an army of lobbyists and paid for with campaign contributions, Florida’s congressional delegation is fighting the secretary’s plan to regulate for-profit colleges.

The regulations, which could go into effect as soon as July 2011, are a response to increasingly bad news from the for-profit industry. The default rate on federal loans taken out by students at for-profit colleges is now twice the combined default rate for private and public non-profit colleges and universities.

A far-reaching investigation conducted by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) revealed one culprit behind the disastrous numbers: “Aggressive” and “dishonest” tactics used by recruiters at for-profit colleges, such as the University of Phoenix Online and Kaplan Higher Education. The GAO investigation found that recruiters encourage low-income and non-traditional applicants to borrow tens of thousands in federally subsidized loans in order to pay their tuition, while misleading them about the total costs of the programs, as well as job placement rates. (In reality, the former is often higher than anticipated; the latter is almost always lower).

With the support of the White House and a handful of Senate Democrats, the Education Department proposed new regulations that would require for-profit institutions to meet certain standards in order to remain eligible for federal student loans.

Many Florida politicians, however, say they are reticent to sign off on any new rules that would prohibit schools from accepting federal financial aid. Their argument is that Florida is run — from the kitchen to the IT office — by graduates of for-profit schools.

On Aug. 31, Florida Reps. Ander Crenshaw, Alan Grayson, John Mica, Bill Posey, Jenny Browne-Waite, Jeff Miller and Thomas Rooney submitted a public comment objecting to the proposed regulations.

“We share the department’s goal of protecting the return on investment of higher education for the student and the taxpayer,” reads the letter. “However, we do not believe that this rule is the best possible solution,” because the “proposed rule would dramatically limit” the number of available programs for students.

“In Florida, more than 300,000 students attended proprietary colleges and universities in 2009, an increase of 63 percent over 2004, according to the Commission for Independent Education,” the letter goes on to say. “These colleges and universities provide a unique educational option for students who are not well-served by traditional higher education. Proprietary colleges and universities offer customization and flexibility to students who are single parents, have a lower income, work at a full-time job while pursuing an education, or are otherwise at-risk for successful completion. The department’s proposed rule will single out these students, despite the fact that degreed graduates of these institutions have highly marketable skills that enable them to improve their lives.”

The letter asks the Ed. Dept. to “consider delaying further consideration of the proposed rule” until the GAO weighs in on the for-profit sector writ large.

While many for-profit colleges have promised to voluntarily reform their recruiting divisions, the Education Department plans to move ahead with the regulations, despite concerns from Florida politicians.

NEXT: Why are Florida Democrats opposed to regulating predatory lending?

“In general, we think for-profit schools will help play an important rule in meeting the president’s goal in making the U.S. No. 1 in college graduates,” said Education Department spokesman Justin Hamilton. “But far too many for-profit schools are saddling students with debt they can’t afford in exchange for certificates and degrees they can’t use.”

Independent analysts have said much the same thing.

“The basic issue here is there a number of training programs get people ready for professions that are low paying, but also necessary,” said Ben Miller, a policy analyst at Education Sector. “The cost for many of these programs is just too high. And that’s a problem that would be reflected not just in the gainful employment issue but in the high cohort default rates as well. If you’re training people to go into a job that they can’t even earn enough to pay for that training, then you’ve done them a disservice. That’s especially sad because those people have done everything right — they worked hard, sacrificed time, and graduated.”

The Education Department has made a point over the last two months of reminding taxpayers that many for-profit colleges derive as much as 90 percent of their profit from federal subsidies. The department also points out that the regulations wouldn’t unfairly target low-income or minority students, contrary to claims by the opponents of the new rules. “Our proposed regulations don’t affect whether or not students can get money to go to school,” Hamilton said. “They affect whether the worst programs can continue to defraud students and taxpayers.”

In addition to the aforementioned representatives, Florida Democratic Reps. Alcee Hastings and Debbie Wasserman Schultz have also written Duncan’s office disapproving of the new “gainful employment” regulations. Both also sit on the House’s education committee. According to sources in the education industry, Democratic Rep. Kendrick Meek, who’s making a run for U.S. Senate, also wrote Duncan’s office objecting to the regulations.

With so many low-income students defaulting on their loans and sinking into crushing debt, why haven’t Florida Democrats taken this opportunity criticize the for-profit industry’s predatory behavior?

An investigation conducted by ProPublica found that many of the Democratic opponents of the Education Department’s new regulations are the recipients of campaign funds and intense lobbying by the for-profit sector.

“Collectively, members who signed the letters received nearly $94,000 from the for-profit college sector between the beginning of 2010 and late July, according to the most recent available campaign finance data reviewed by ProPublica. Most of the donations flowed after March 22 — the date the first letter was written to Duncan,” reports ProPublica.

“The for-profit industry has not been shy about using its financial weight to lobby for what it wants. The founder of one for-profit chain, Arthur Keiser, has become a major national donor, according to campaign finance records. Keiser is also the current chairman of the Career College Association.”

Keiser, whose company is based in Florida, has contributed $31,600 to members of Congress — many of them from Florida — who signed letters to Duncan.

While the Education Department under Duncan was likely prepared for a war with the for-profit industry — it’s a multi-billion dollar business, after all — it didn’t likely expect to go to war with its own party.

PREMIUM ARTICLE: Subscribe To Keep Reading

Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!

Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!

Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!

Sign Up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
Sign up

By subscribing you agree to our Terms of Use

You're signed up!
BENEFITS READERS PASS PATRIOTS FOUNDERS
Daily and Breaking Newsletters
Daily Caller Shows
Ad Free Experience
Exclusive Articles
Custom Newsletters
Editor Daily Rundown
Behind The Scenes Coverage
Award Winning Documentaries
Patriot War Room
Patriot Live Chat
Exclusive Events
Gold Membership Card
Tucker Mug

What does Founders Club include?

Tucker Mug and Membership Card
Founders

Readers,

Instead of sucking up to the political and corporate powers that dominate America, The Daily Caller is fighting for you — our readers. We humbly ask you to consider joining us in this fight.

Now that millions of readers are rejecting the increasingly biased and even corrupt corporate media and joining us daily, there are powerful forces lined up to stop us: the old guard of the news media hopes to marginalize us; the big corporate ad agencies want to deprive us of revenue and put us out of business; senators threaten to have our reporters arrested for asking simple questions; the big tech platforms want to limit our ability to communicate with you; and the political party establishments feel threatened by our independence.

We don't complain -- we can't stand complainers -- but we do call it how we see it. We have a fight on our hands, and it's intense. We need your help to smash through the big tech, big media and big government blockade.

We're the insurgent outsiders for a reason: our deep-dive investigations hold the powerful to account. Our original videos undermine their narratives on a daily basis. Even our insistence on having fun infuriates them -- because we won’t bend the knee to political correctness.

One reason we stand apart is because we are not afraid to say we love America. We love her with every fiber of our being, and we think she's worth saving from today’s craziness.

Help us save her.

A second reason we stand out is the sheer number of honest responsible reporters we have helped train. We have trained so many solid reporters that they now hold prominent positions at publications across the political spectrum. Hear a rare reasonable voice at a place like CNN? There’s a good chance they were trained at Daily Caller. Same goes for the numerous Daily Caller alumni dominating the news coverage at outlets such as Fox News, Newsmax, Daily Wire and many others.

Simply put, America needs solid reporters fighting to tell the truth or we will never have honest elections or a fair system. We are working tirelessly to make that happen and we are making a difference.

Since 2010, The Daily Caller has grown immensely. We're in the halls of Congress. We're in the Oval Office. And we're in up to 20 million homes every single month. That's 20 million Americans like you who are impossible to ignore.

We can overcome the forces lined up against all of us. This is an important mission but we can’t do it unless you — the everyday Americans forgotten by the establishment — have our back.

Please consider becoming a Daily Caller Patriot today, and help us keep doing work that holds politicians, corporations and other leaders accountable. Help us thumb our noses at political correctness. Help us train a new generation of news reporters who will actually tell the truth. And help us remind Americans everywhere that there are millions of us who remain clear-eyed about our country's greatness.

In return for membership, Daily Caller Patriots will be able to read The Daily Caller without any of the ads that we have long used to support our mission. We know the ads drive you crazy. They drive us crazy too. But we need revenue to keep the fight going. If you join us, we will cut out the ads for you and put every Lincoln-headed cent we earn into amplifying our voice, training even more solid reporters, and giving you the ad-free experience and lightning fast website you deserve.

Patriots will also be eligible for Patriots Only content, newsletters, chats and live events with our reporters and editors. It's simple: welcome us into your lives, and we'll welcome you into ours.

We can save America together.

Become a Daily Caller Patriot today.

Signature

Neil Patel