Opinion

The TSA is violating our Fourth Amendment rights

Photo of Brandon Macsata
Brandon Macsata
Contributor
  • See All Articles
  • Subscribe to RSS
  • Bio

      Brandon Macsata

      Brandon Macsata serves as Managing Partner of The Macsata-Kornegay Group, Inc. – a national political and public affairs consulting firm specializing in grassroots media campaigns and political fundraising. He is widely recognized for ability to connect national, state and local stakeholders interested in influencing public policy and the political process. Macsata has extensive experience working with political candidates, national and statewide trade associations, and other corporate entities.

      The Macsata-Kornegay Group, Inc. provides professional consultation on political strategies, public policy, communications & marketing strategies and media relations. The firm also offers grassroots advocacy training to better exchange organizations in the legislative process. Starting in January 2005, The Macsata-Kornegay Group, Inc. also started its fundraising activities for political candidates, political action committees, trade associations and non-profits.

      First diagnosed as HIV-positive in March 2002, Macsata has dedicated much of his professional and personal life advocating for persons living with HIV/AIDS. He currently serves as CEO of the ADAP Advocacy Association (aaa+), a national non-profit organization working to improve the AIDS Drug Assistance Program. From November 2003 to March 2006, he authored a weekly news column on national HIV-related stories for The Weekly News in Miami, Florida. He is also a former ADAP recipient.

      He also serves as Executive Director of the Association for Airline Passenger Rights (AAPR), and General Consultant to the US Business Leadership Network.

      Macsata formerly served as the Executive Director of the American Congress of Community Support & Employment Services (ACCSES), a national trade association representing the interests of community, non-profit agencies providing supports and services to persons with disabilities. During his tenure with ACCSES, he served on the NISH Board of Directors and co-chair of the Consortium for Citizens with Disabilities Fiscal Policy Task Force.

      Prior to moving to Washington, DC in 2000, he opened a 100-bed assisted living care facility in Wilmington, North Carolina. Serving as the facility’s assistant administrator, Macsata worked closely with families, community leaders and state agencies to advocate for seniors.

      In his current capacity as Managing Partner of The Macsata-Kornegay Group, Inc., Macsata has worked with the Disability Service Providers of American (DSPA), ACCSES-DSPA Alliance (now ‘ACCSES’), US Business Leadership Network (USBLN®), One Percent Coalition, CCDH (formerly Community Committee for the Developmentally Handicapped), Brevard Achievement Center, ARC Broward, UCP of East-Central Florida/WORC, MACtown, Title II Community AIDS National Network (TIICANN), Illinois Association of Rehabilitation Facilities, Florida Association of Rehabilitation Facilities, RESPECT of Florida and United States International Council on Disabilities (USICD).

      Macsata’s passion for improving the lives of persons with disabilities started with his association with Carolina Canines for Service, Inc., a non-profit organization that trains and places service dogs at no cost to the recipient. In 1999-2000 he served as the President of their Board of Directors.

      Macsata has advised candidates for political office, and has also run for office himself at the local and national levels. In 1995, he was just 79 votes short of beating a 22-year incumbent and becoming the youngest person ever elected in the State of North Carolina. In 2000, he formed an exploratory committee to run for the U.S. House of Representatives before ultimately deciding against running for that office. He is a Cum Laude graduate of the University of North Carolina at Wilmington, where he received a Bachelor of Arts in political science.

As the executive director of the Association for Airline Passenger Rights (AAPR), as well as a passenger who has personally experienced just about every security screening technique employed by our federal government — including enhanced full-body scanners and aggressive pat-downs, to name a few – I feel compelled to address the recent TSA flap.

Just prior to the busy Thanksgiving holiday travel weekend, AAPR took a strong public stand against the security measures being used by the Transportation Security Administration (TSA), which we would like to further explain. AAPR concluded that the enhanced full-body scanners and aggressive pat-downs, among other things, violate privacy rights protected by the U.S. Constitution’s Fourth Amendment (scanners and pat-downs), pose potential medical risks to passengers (scanners) and divert limited manpower and resources from other more effective security screening measures. AAPR’s position was fortified when TSA Administrator John S. Pistole brushed aside the legitimate concerns expressed over privacy rights by defending his agency with belittling statements towards groups like AAPR. The arrogance of TSA led AAPR to support the National Opt-Out Day. It is a decision that we stand behind!

Ask yourself this simple question: Would you deem it acceptable if, when walking down the street in your hometown of Washington, DC, you were randomly stopped by law enforcement and told that you had to undergo a pat-down or strip search? What would your reaction be if, when asked why, law enforcement responded that it was to ensure the “safety and security” of the community and the people around you? Fortunately for us, it would never happen in the United States, at least not without probable cause by law enforcement. Why? Because those are the rights afforded to people in the United States — regardless of their citizenship — under the U.S. Constitution’s Fourth Amendment.

So it begs the question, why is it acceptable for TSA to engage in the very same practice, all under the guise of protecting the safety and security of the flying public? The answer is simple: It is NOT acceptable! And according to Zogby International, 61% of likely voters oppose TSA’s new security measures, while 48% said they would probably seek alternatives to flying. Is this an issue where the U.S. airline industry and passengers can agree?

Interestingly enough, only the government and the companies manufacturing the enhanced full-body scanners seem to be supportive of the security screenings. Joining the chorus behind airline passenger rights groups has been the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), unions representing airline pilots and flight attendants, disability rights organizations and others groups. Further evidence that TSA is taking the wrong approach is the mere fact that far-right conservatives and extreme-left liberals are singing the same tune against the security screenings.

Benjamin Franklin once said, “He who sacrifices freedom for security deserves neither.”

Apparently, members of Congress agree with our founding fathers, as they are lining up against TSA’s new security measures. On November 18th, Rep. John J. Duncan, Jr. (TN-2) told the Knoxville News Sentinel, “The American people should not have to choose between having full-body radiation or a very embarrassing, intrusive pat-down every time they fly, as if they were criminals.” Rep. Duncan also called into question the lucrative nature of the contracts being secured by some of the private companies represented by former U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff.

  • Pingback: Why the TSA’s Technology Violates the 4th Amendment

  • Pingback: Big Brother Now Wants Your Dog’s Poop In A Database | AttitudeAmerica.com | Get Your Attitude Back, America!

  • Raycheetah

    Many Americans are concerned about the open violation by the TSA of our Constitutionally protected rights enumerated under the 4th Amendment:

    “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”

    Those rights are not granted by the Constitution; rather, they are natural to ALL people, and unalienable, unable even to be surrendered as representatives of the TSA have claimed that buying an airline ticket constitutes. To the contrary, traveling by air is an assumption of informed personal responsibility for a minuscule risk. The right to free travel (as a normal, lawful activity) at reasonable risk is implicitly guaranteed in the 9th Amendment:

    “The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.”

    Former Assistant TSA Admin on Security Checkpoints, Mo McGowan, states on video, “Nobody likes to have their 4th Amendment violated going through a security line, but truth of the matter is, we’re gonna have to do it.” (link below)

    http://www.leftcoastrebel.com/2010/11/quote-of-day-nobody-likes-to-have-their.html

    I further recommend the following article for analysis of the implicit unlawfulness of TSA policy, as well as the direct affront to decency and human dignity it inflicts (not to mention the inherent health hazard presented by even low-level radiation of this sort, currently mandated by TSA policy entirely divorced from common sense and lawful oversight):

    http://pajamasmedia.com/blog/tsa-strip-and-grope-meet-the-fourth-amendment/

    The TSA forces people to submit to pointless, dangerous, and demeaning searches, either a virtual strip-search, or what amounts to sexual molestation in violation of their basic human rights, simply for the privilege of air travel, and all without any likely probable cause, or regard for due process.

    TSA agents, following a policy of which they don’t understand the full implications and potential consequences, are in direct violation of the Federal Employee Oath of Office, with regard to the 4th Amendment:

    “I, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.”

    …Not to mention being at risk of extremely harsh penalty as a consequence:

    US Code § 242. Deprivation of rights under color of law

    “Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section…

    …or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.”

    Aggravated sexual abuse in the deprivation of Constitutional rights (as these warrantless grope-searches may be defined) can carry a death penalty.

    Let the TSA rank-and-file know what’s at risk if they continue to violate our rights.

    It is the responsibility of Americans NOT to submit to violations of our rights:

    “Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759

    Every liberty we surrender is another link forged into chains to enslave us. =’[.]‘=

  • vanbluemoon

    100 percent in a agreement with your article! Thanks.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RgqPmDpUv10