Keep your eyes on California

After the 2010 midterms, you could almost hear conservative pundits dismissing California as the land of fruits, nuts and irrelevancy. They couldn’t be further from the truth. Even though California doggedly stayed left while nearly every other state veered right, it still remains the supercharged engine for America’s progressive movement. If anything, the midterms just stomped down its accelerator.

California’s accelerated national influence is evident in what many dismiss as a loss for liberals, the defeat of Proposition 19, the marijuana legalization initiative. Most conservative commentators saw the vote against legal pot as proof that even California isn’t that crazy, but look again. More Californians voted to legalize marijuana than voted for Republican Meg Whitman for governor, even though Prop 19’s supporters spent a mere $4 million on their campaign, compared to Whitman’s $163 million.

Like earlier society-bending propositions on the California ballot — gay marriage and global warming are recent examples — the measure blazed the trail for similar efforts in other states. Ethan Nadelmann, executive director of the pro-legalization Drug Policy Alliance, put it this way, “California’s Proposition 19 may not have won a majority of voters yesterday, but it already represents an extraordinary victory for the broader movement to legalize marijuana. Its mere presence on the ballot … elevated and legitimized public discourse about marijuana and marijuana policy.” Students for Sensible Drug Policy, another pro-legalization group, added, “One of the greatest hidden victories of the Prop 19 campaign was that it trained the emerging generation of marijuana reformers on how to run a legalization campaign, and left virtually all of them wanting to win on this issue in 2012.” Colorado is a likely target.

Similarly, California’s rejection of Prop 23, ensuring the state would continue its plunge into cap and trade even as Congress is backing away from similar legislation, has reinvigorated global warming activists.  As the Daily Green blog put it, “The federal government needs to take a close look at the result.”

Prop 19 was on the ballot in California, not Kansas or Alabama or even Massachusetts, because supporters of liberal social change know they’ll get more publicity and possibly even a winning vote in unrepentantly liberal California. The state nurtured progressivism a century ago and has given the movement staying power through its modeling of liberal legislation and policies and the sheer number of progressives churned out by its universities — so much so that it’s not likely Barack Obama would be president today were it not for the very blue Golden State.

While the established political parties and their consultants will ignore California and pore over campaigns in other states for clues on how to capitalize on — or crush — the Tea Party’s influence, the Left will be studying what happened in California, so they can replicate it the next time around. What they will find is not so much a magic formula but a vast progressive infrastructure they will then work to replicate elsewhere.

I call this infrastructure the PEER Axis, for the progressives, environmentalists, educators and reporters who collectively run California and influence the underpinnings of America. The PEER Axis remains powerful because politicians and political movements may come and go, but government bureaucrats and regulators, environmentalists and social justice activists, and their supporters in education and the media are pretty much forever. The structure of California ensures that appropriately indoctrinated college graduates will continue to fill the personnel pipelines that run from Berkeley, UCLA and other liberal universities straight into the progressive movement.

  • Pingback: California Universities are the Best

  • Pingback: Clarity Blog » Blog Archive » California’s Universities are the Best

  • junkmaninohio

    The California public service employee unions would have made chopped liver out of Meg Whitman had she won the race for Governor. Too bad it cost her $163 million in the process. That said, don’t be surprized when California and Governor Moon Beam come calling for Federal taxpayer bailouts early next year. I hope the new House GOP congress will say NO!

  • gooners

    California, like most states that conservatives love to hate, is a donor state. That means the people of California send way more money to the federal government then they receive in spending. The states conservatives love are the ones that make out on the deal, receiving far more in federal spending than they pay in federal taxes. So until the Red States figure out a way to pay for themselves, no one wants to hear red states attacking blues states. The “coastal elite” states fund your miserable southern poverty pits.

  • sholling

    Pearce gets so much wrong but manages a nugget of truth here and there. First Whitman isn’t one bit more conservative than the very liberal but moderately pro 2nd Amendment Jerry Brown. Whitman who is staunchly anti 2nd Amendment lost a huge chunk of the conservative base to Brown as a result. Second almost nobody right, left, or center wanted a Schwarzenegger clone (minus the charisma) making the already feckless RINO party look even more feckless or even more RINO. There were no conservative Republicans running for governor – just degrees of liberal RINOs.

    The average Californian is a fiscally conservative small L libertarian even if they don’t know what a libertarian is. They just know the truth about our RINOs. That the California RINO party has a long history of running fiscal moderates eager to make back room tax and spend deals (while faking a fight) that are also nanny state social right wingers. The party machine refuses to back (and despises) TEA Party type candidates. Californians are fed up with them which is why we’re going to a “jungle primary” where 3rd parties have a good shot at displacing the RINOs and Democrats. It’s also why we put new limits on taxation and “fees” and ended the Republican/Democrat deal that gave us 10 years of gerrymandering and locked us into a left turn. Perhaps if Pearce wasn’t so fixated on the continuing nanny state marijuana bans he’d see that. Really the one and only thing that he got right was the “PEER Axis, for the progressives, environmentalists, educators and reporters who collectively run California”. California doesn’t have a Fox News like source of information. Even the local Fox stations lean left so darn few knew what the global warming bill was all about and what it meant not to pass the repeal of a law supported by a “Republican” governor. The writer needs to climb down out of the ivory tower and get out to the next TEA Party.

  • Pingback: Tweets that mention Keep your eyes on California | The Daily Caller - Breaking News, Opinion, Research, and Entertainment -- Topsy.com