Politics

White House and Coburn trade barbs over tax deal and fiscal responsibility

Photo of Jon Ward
Jon Ward
Contributor
  • See All Articles
  • Send Email
  • Subscribe to RSS
  • Follow on Twitter
  • Bio

      Jon Ward

      Jon Ward covers the White House and national politics for The Daily Caller. He covered the last two years of George W. Bush's presidency and the first year of Barack Obama's presidency for The Washington Times. Prior to moving to national politics, Jon worked for the Times' city desk and bureaus in Virginia and Maryland, covering local news and politics, including the D.C. sniper shootings and subsequent trial, before moving to state politics in Maryland. He and his wife have two children and live on Capitol Hill. || <a href="mailto:jw@dailycaller.com">Email Jon</a>

President Obama and Sen. Tom Coburn have always had a relationship that is odd by Washington standards.

They are total opposites in terms of personal style and their political points of view. But they have maintained what is, by all appearances, a warm personal friendship that was first formed when they both entered the Senate in 2004. Coburn has spoken often of how he prays for Obama and writes him encouraging letters.

“How better to influence somebody than love them?” Coburn has said. “We’re very good friends.”

Late this past week, however, the debate over the president’s tax deal with Republicans – and a side debate about the nation’s deficit and debt – provoked some of the strongest barbs between Obama and Coburn to date. The crossfire occurred between surrogates, and not between the two principals, but was nonetheless notable for its intensity.

The sniping began Friday morning when White House press secretary Robert Gibbs was asked in a press briefing about Coburn’s comments earlier in the week warning of an imminent debt crisis if the government does not present a plan to reduce its budget deficit and unfunded long-term obligations.

Gibbs said that while Coburn “is a friend of the president” there was “a little dissonance” in the Oklahoma Republican’s debt warnings and his support for extending all of the Bush tax cuts for two more years.

The issue at the heart of the tax deal debate is whether those who make more than $250,000 a year should see their taxes go up rather than stay at the current levels. Gibbs and most Democrats say that extending tax cuts costs money, and to the extent that they are comparing the gap between projected government revenues and planned government spending, they are correct.

“There’s a price tag on this bill that according to some it doesn’t actually—it’s not spending,” Gibbs said.

But Republicans like Coburn argue that keeping rates the same only adds to the deficit if you are working off a budget projections that assumes rates were going to go up, as the White House has done. And the answer of many conservatives to liberal complaints about tax cuts is that to keep the deficit from ballooning, spending should be cut. (Democrats often say Republicans are much better at cutting taxes than cutting spending, and based on the past decade, they are largely correct).

In the present scenario, however, it is the hope of some conservatives like Coburn that maintaining current tax rates will put pressure on the government to cut spending. Keeping tax rates steady and lowering spending, they believe, will create sustainable economic growth – the key ingredient to ultimately bringing down the nation’s debt.

  • KIM LIONS

    I must say this and I will probably get a lot of flack too, but from personal experience I have not found it possible to have a close friendship with anyone who has such opposing views to my own. I do believe and have had mutual respect and friendly acquaintance relationships but not close friendship. So my conclusion is that Coburn is not 180 degrees different from Obama and neither is the Republicans, both parties keep spending and spending. It was Coburn who said last week concerning the Deficit bill, ” I hate 50% of this bill but we have to do something or we are going to be in big trouble”, and the same FIRE,FIRE saga continues!

  • Pingback: Dead Cats: Swindles, 12/13/10, (3)88 James Brody | Dead Cats & Clippings

  • BarackMugabe

    “Where is the White House’s plan? Where is their list of cuts? How many spending bills have they vetoed?”

    Yes, what happened to that finely sharpened “scalpel” that Maobama brandished throughout the campaign?

    Or was that just another campaign lie intended to mask the true Marxist agenda?

  • Pingback: White House and Coburn trade barbs over tax deal and fiscal responsibility @ 2012 Presidential Election Year

  • jonavark

    @louzer

    how do you propose we pay for our decade of wars?

    By winning them Lou.

    • loudog

      Oh, well, great! Can you just define “winning” in Afghanistan and when that might happen?

  • ladylove

    big deal so Coburn has been trying to influence Obama with LOVE, by praying for him, and writing him encouraging letters.

    and all he has accomplished, is killing Obama with kindness.

    that is what everyone has been doing.

    those brave souls who do stand up to this president, get labeled as racists, thus no one dares speak up.

    up to and including President William Jefferson Clinton.

    Obama needs people to stand up to him, not coddle him, as they have been doing.

    and this Coburn is not the one to do it.

    Obama is living proof that if you spare the rod, you spoil the child.